#x27;ve
> been involved in several start-ups.
>
> Let's see what we can do to build a vibrant Oregon Ubuntu community
> together.
>
> Your thoughts?
>
> -- Richard
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-us-or mailing list
> Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or
the contributions as we have less contributors
today than we did a few years ago.
Sincerely,
Benjamin Kerensa
On Aug 16, 2018, 7:38 AM -0700, Dão Gottwald via governance
, wrote:
> The use of Slack at Mozilla has bothered me for a while. So far I managed
> to pretty much ignore Slack.
When would you be available Steve?
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 12:24:30PM -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Sorry about that! So with release date on April 26th it might make sense
> > to do the 28th and my guess is since w
Looks like they add 15% so might need to bump it up slightly but I guess we
have some
time.
Lets see about feedback or maybe other ideas? Let it simmer for a few days
and then
we can nail things down and submit a request?
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Kerensa
wrote:
> In the p
rt of thing (like with all the
> electricity, connectivity, etc.)?
>
> In any case, I'm willing to support whatever we can come up with. I just
> need some numbers to hand off to Canonical ;)
>
> On 2018-01-29 12:24, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Sorry about that! So with release date
eSchedule
>
> On 2018-01-29 12:13, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Is there a tentative release date yet that you know of?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Walter Lapchynski
> > wrote:
> >
> >> As the guy with the contacts in Portland, I'd be in
Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> Sure. How much should I request? Canonical usually wants a breakdown of
> costs.
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 08:21:29AM +0000, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Hoping wxl is still willing to make a funds request as the loco lead as
> > this will
> >
; > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Kyle Fazzari <
> kyle.fazz...@canonical.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > On Nov 3, 2017 18:30, "Benjamin Kerensa"
> wrote:
> > > > > In fact what if we did an UbuCon in Portland? :)
> > &g
g that I can do on
> my end and to get discussion picked back up.
>
> Hope everyone had a decent holiday!
>
> --c_smith
> --
> Ubuntu-us-or mailing list
> Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listin
Injecting addons whether enabled or disabled into a set of users based on
their geographic location is a privacy issue.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:29 AM Boris Zbarsky via governance <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> On 12/16/17 4:09 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > Yes this i
no,Mozilla did it again,
> they cannot be trusted)
>
> Please "governance" do something and stop that.
>
> Thanks
>
> - an old Mozillian contributor
> ___
> governance mailing list
&g
>> /*
>> * Sent from a system running Ubuntu *
>> */
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-us-or mailing list
>> Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>&
_
> governance mailing list
> governance@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
to Canonical.
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:07 PM Walter Lapchynski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 01:47:20PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 6:32 PM, Kyle Fazzari
> wrote:
> > > On Nov 3, 2017 18:30, "Benjamin Kerensa" wrote:
> >
In fact what if we did an UbuCon in Portland? :)
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Cody Smith wrote:
> Nice, now I don't have to try and remember to mention this tomorrow.
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Benjamin Kerensa
> wrote:
>
>> We should do one in Portland i
> >> @wxl | polka.bike
> >> C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D
> >> 68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ubuntu-us-or mailing list
> >> Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com
> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> >> htt
governance@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
ct was
> covered by the same license as our codebase is, but I'm no expert in this.
> Just got curious and a bit surprised with limited amount of communication
> about the impact of that on us in public.
>
> zb.
> _______
ndling our software with software that uses
> this license?
>
> zb.
> ___
> governance mailing list
> governance@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
It really continues to be inappropriate for people to police how you choose
to communicate and express yourself Alberta.
While using a video may be unorthodox it doesn't violate any community
rules and those who dislike it are free to scroll past.
On Jun 7, 2017 7:00 PM, "Alberto Salvia Novella"
Jose,
It's really not your place to police how he chooses to communicate with
fellow contributors so long as his communication is within the scope of the
Ubuntu CoC.
Simply put your job is not to police others expression or communication or
to try and create rules that the community has not agree
Jose,
It's really not your place to police how he chooses to communicate with
fellow contributors so long as his communication is within the scope of the
Ubuntu CoC.
Simply put your job is not to police others expression or communication or
to try and create rules that the community has not agree
rnative ideas for how we can achieve
> the outcomes outlined above.
>
> -- Mike
> ___
> dev-planning mailing list
> dev-plann...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
> * Sent from a system running Ubuntu *
> */
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Che Dean wrote:
>
>> Linda and me are open to weekend meetups, as long as we have a bit of
>> notice.
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 at 20:
stinfo/ubuntu-us-or
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-us-or mailing list
>> Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
>> mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-or
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-us-or mailing list
>&g
e are likely other paths too. I
see nothing to indicate that you have the authority to close down this
discussion. If no one in Mozilla wishes to engage then that is their
choice, I just won't bother here any more.
Regards
Douglas Crosher
On 02/24/2017 09:33 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>
Douglas Crosher
On 02/24/2017 08:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> There is no escalation if the module owner and decision makers in the
> bug have made a decision.
>
> It appears you've exhausted your options.
>
> On Feb 23, 2017 1:23 PM, "Douglas Crosher via g
There is no escalation if the module owner and decision makers in the bug
have made a decision.
It appears you've exhausted your options.
On Feb 23, 2017 1:23 PM, "Douglas Crosher via governance" <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to bring the following review decision
em.
> Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
> _______
> Spi-private mailing list
> spi-priv...@lists.spi-inc.org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-private
> Unsubscribe using https://members.spi-inc.org/
>
--
*Benjamin Kerensa
Filipus,
This is a governance mailing list and the issue you've raised is not a
governance matter rather something that deals with participation and
conduct.
You might wish to contact the participation team but this matter seems
settled and final.
On Oct 9, 2016 11:48 AM, "Filipus Klutiero" wro
If anyone is driving up consider planning a time to swing by and pick up
the Ubuntu Oregon gear? We have two banners and a table cloth here.
I'm in East Portland
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016, 5:20 PM Scarlett Clark <
scarlett.gately.cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe Pizza and booze is being provided a
I'm glad this finally got sorted out having been involved in some of the
discussions
earlier on and trying to sort out the differences. Kudos to everyone who
sorted this out!
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:55:42 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru
wrote:
> Package: iceweasel
> Version: 45.0~b5-1
> Severity: normal
>
I'd encourage that a peer be from the Mozilla InfoSec Team to audit and vet
the accesses to user data that volunteers are being given access too.
If a security issue arose on any of these community hosted platforms
Mozilla would take a PR hit for not having vetted the processes and access
to user
r Chrome compatibility, this means chromium.
>
> I wrote this myself and mean every word. Best,
>
> /be
>
>
> ___
> governance mailing list
> governance@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
Project Leader, Glu
I think we know that recognition is lacking this was something CBT at one
point was trying to fix but since CBT was disbanded it seems recognition
was dropped also as something to solve.
I think having a emeritus role doesn't make sense and think it will be one
more thing that someone has to keep
'd like to set
> the record straight as much as I can.
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Benjamin Kerensa
> wrote:
>
>> Would you agree though that while you were not paid to integrate
>> that it was probably known that there was a revenue sharing deal
>> go
n.
>
> Best regards,
> David
>
> On 15/12/15 18:37, »Q« wrote:
> > In <news:mailman.38.1450200542.21136.governa...@lists.mozilla.org>,
> > David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/12/15 18:27, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> >>> I agre
, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:28 AM David Rajchenbach-Teller <
dtel...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/12/15 18:27, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > I agree and it's disappointing when the first thread on Pocket was
> > discussed here Mozilla said there was no money deal to integr
not state
the truth on why a feature was added.
We already saw tiles was a bad mistake so how many months until Mozilla
realizes Pocket was too?
--
Benjamin Kerensa
http://benjaminkerensa.com | @bkerensa on Twitter
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:47 AM a wrote:
> Please don't include p
It's not that Mozilla cannot but that it does not see Thunderbird as having
the level potential at impacting the open web that Mozilla believes Firefox
and its other investments will.
There is already a team of community contributors that develop it.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:58 AM wrote:
> W dn
I'm confident that Mozilla is not going to invest to expand Thunderbird by
making any kind of server edition.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:54 AM Paul Fernhout
wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 7:47:58 AM UTC-5, Andrew Sutherland wrote:
> > The problem with Thunderbird is not that it is a ma
I'm just going to add that Mitchell's email while we u see stand what she
said I think the messaging could have been different. I'm unsure if PR was
consulted but the end result has been very negative media for Thunderbird
as a project and Mozilla across media in all countries.
I don't even know w
e folks to engage productively within the
> process. It also of course allows those who prefer a different course of
> action to be vocal. We’ve seen this before with Thunderbird. Building a
> positive response and a positive conversation will be a very useful first
> step in making a good future for Thunderbird.
>
>
> M
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.governance/xs7Sfyxc4As
> [3] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/websites/
> [4]
> https://github.com/mozilla/legal-docs/commit/c7535610c36e59d048d5138861058174c77755df
> ___
> governa
gt; [4]
> https://github.com/mozilla/legal-docs/commit/c7535610c36e59d048d5138861058174c77755df
> ___
> governance mailing list
> governance@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
http://benjaminkerensa.com
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
Mark has experience being both a peer and I believe owner of Thunderbird
I'm confident he will do well as owner of Loop.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:55 AM Adam Roach wrote:
> Hi, governance.
>
> I'm shifting my role around a bit, and won't be dedicating as much time
> to Loop (aka Firefox Hello)[1
log: http://www.bitstampede.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/sheppy
> Check my Availability <https://freebusy.io/esheph...@mozilla.com>
> _______
> governance mailing list
> governance@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
To be totally honest it seems disappointing that were still blocked on
this. One issue I do see is we haven't defined a Mozillian well and new
hires are vouched as Mozillians instantly and new volunteers can be vouched
easily.
Vouched Mozillians status has kind of been watered down if you compare
plift.org
> <https://www.facebook.com/SE.Uplift> <http://instagram.com/seuplift>
> <http://visitor.r20.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v=001LWHzEOkwl_-bnB755ck-yIyL86auU4W_8fR9_r2X9NT20D_hKK2fxl2RkDIxoxgXMo8dCkl5_aG9yJJPwWPMvtY2vvuFShE1lXXC3_wfYNE%3D>
>
> For ADA and language translation requests call 503-232-0010.
>
> ___
> Board-private mailing list
> Board-private@lists.montavillapdx.org
> http://lists.montavillapdx.org/listinfo.cgi/board-private-montavillapdx.org
>
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
___
Board-private mailing list
Board-private@lists.montavillapdx.org
http://lists.montavillapdx.org/listinfo.cgi/board-private-montavillapdx.org
to participate, I
am more than happy to contact Resolutions NW and get the conversation
started.
>
> -Kelly
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Benjamin Kerensa
wrote:
>>
>> Just to add in talking with Jennifer Tamayo about this and reviewing the
ONI Standards it do
Just to add in talking with Jennifer Tamayo about this and reviewing the
ONI Standards it does not appear that NA's can change agendas
once they have been posted.
The ONI Standards say: "All notice, written or verbal, shall state the
date, time, and place of the meeting, and a brief description of
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzXQ1XM0s0ZCTXdONWJDOW1CdWc/view?usp=sharing>"
> and the "Steering Committee Charter
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzXQ1XM0s0ZCZ1dzSHJ2a09QV3M/view?usp=sharing>
> ".
>
> I will be glad to re-post the agenda when we come up with o
> dev-planning mailing list
> dev-plann...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-planning
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
I'm looking forward to Austin... Just a short flight for me.
On Jul 21, 2015 7:12 AM, "Walter Lapchynski" wrote:
>
> well at least it's not Houston 😕
>
> @wxl | http://polka.bike
> Lubuntu Release Manager & Head of QA
> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact
> Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader
> Ubuntu Membership B
Charles,
A few responses to your responses.
> Ben:
> A few responses to yours.
>On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 16:42 -0700, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> Charles,
>
> I don't believe anything I said was inaccurate and yes I did use
> profanity but as its been explained to me profa
Charles,
I don't believe anything I said was inaccurate and yes I did use profanity
but as its been explained to me profanity in and of itself is not a
violation of the Code of Conduct. That said this remark was made on a
third-party site not subject to the Ubuntu Code of Conduct but that values
f
Thanks for all your work Gavin and I think Dave can provide leadership to
take Firefox to where it needs to go.
On Jul 13, 2015 5:58 PM, "Gavin Sharp" wrote:
>
> Almost 4 years ago, Mike Shaver handed me the reigns of Firefox module
> ownership [1]. At the time, he said:
>
> > While being an empl
Might I suggest some dates further out be picked and a doodle sent to both
councils so the best time date for all can be found?
On Jun 18, 2015 4:30 AM, "Charles Profitt" wrote:
>
> While I can understand the desire to have a meeting quickly I feel it is
more important to ensure that people have
Might I suggest some dates further out be picked and a doodle sent to both
councils so the best time date for all can be found?
On Jun 18, 2015 4:30 AM, "Charles Profitt" wrote:
>
> While I can understand the desire to have a meeting quickly I feel it is
more important to ensure that people have
Might I suggest some dates further out be picked and a doodle sent to both
councils so the best time date for all can be found?
On Jun 18, 2015 4:30 AM, "Charles Profitt" wrote:
>
> While I can understand the desire to have a meeting quickly I feel it is
more important to ensure that people have
-us-or mailing list
>>> Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-or
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> @wxl | http://polka.bike
>> Lubuntu Release Ma
we get a room with seating for 60
> people but only 40 people attend. What is the charge?
>
> 2) Are the coffee shuttles limited to coffee? I don't drink caffine, so if
> we could get a couple hot chocolate shuttles (or juice) that would be great
> (even if there is extra cost
So for a @mozilla.com account it would be best to be in touch with Mark
Banner who setup the thunderb...@mozilla.com aliases
and can put in a request for another.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:27 PM, R Kent James wrote:
> On 4/24/2015 3:43 PM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>
>> Currently
Currently @mozilla.org aliases and accounts are for original @mozilla.org
folks (a handful of people) and were for sometime used by foundation but
that practice stopped AFAIK otherwise they are assigned anymore. There has
been discussion over the years of allowing both contributors and projects
ins
On Apr 20, 2015 12:06 PM, "Kyle Huey" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:03 PM, David Weir
wrote:
> > Can someone update these
> >
> > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Mozilla_Websites
> >
> > I believe Mozillians is now pierros for example
>
> You should ask the relevant teams to do this.
>
>
or going to Mozilla or bust... LOL.
>
> Thanks all, for supporting a truly great OS.
>
> Ciao for now
> Phil. N
>
> /***
> * Sent from my Commodore 64 *
> ***/
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Che Dean wrote:
>
>> That would be
> > I strongly agree with the sentiment that we should strive to be more open
> > where possible and where openness will help us collectively act in the
> > interests of the mission. My belief is that's going to be a much easier
> > conversation to have once we have a workable taxonomy we can look
>> encouraging people to make use out of it. It never hurts to ask.
>>
>> It is not the quickest possible process, but I can give you the names
>> of key people if you want to sort of expedite the process.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Kerensa
gt;>>>>>> once, but if I find nothing in the next week, we may have to
fall back on
> >>>>>>>>>>> that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --c_smith
> >>>>>>>>>>
ones I run into and have to be cc'ed on or ask about are
>> operational stuff but not something that demands company-confidential
over
>> mozillians - confidential.
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2015 5:25 AM, "Gijs Kruitbosch"
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> O
round how to
do
> that well.
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch
> wrote:
>
> > On 13/04/2015 05:46, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> >
> >> In the cases of things that truly need to be company-confidential then
> >> those could still be marked but
mozillians - confidential.
On Apr 13, 2015 5:25 AM, "Gijs Kruitbosch" wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2015 05:46, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>>
>> In the cases of things that truly need to be company-confidential then
>> those could still be marked but unless a strong justific
pr 3, 2015 at 8:34 PM Cody Smith
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alright, Phil, James (jvlb) and I were discussing this which
is the main reason I sent the original email, and Broadway Commons
We are talking about radical participation this year as a organization
priority but there are still a lot areas of the project and to Mozilla
itself that are not visible to core contributors (I like to call it the
Great Wall of Mozilla) even those who are under NDA. I was recently
discussing how th
Mozilla can also very likely host in Portland but I would need to know
sooner than later to book. We have WiFi, AV, beverages and snacks.
On Apr 3, 2015 6:42 PM, "Cody Smith" wrote:
>
> Okay, so I've heard nothing on this. I can get some wheel in motion to
find a place here in Salem to have a rel
There is already a stack trace in the downstream bugs on Launchpad and
Red Hat's Bugzilla. Are you familiar with upstream reporting?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116525
I dont use that version of Ubuntu anymore this was in 2013 so thats six
Ubuntu releases back. Chris Coulson or someone from the Ubuntu Mozilla
Team should confirm since this is a downstream bug thats marked
confirmed still.
Their bug squad would mark it invalid if it was no longer present.
Either
There is already a stack trace in the downstream bugs on Launchpad and
Red Hat's Bugzilla. Are you familiar with upstream reporting?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165252
Title:
Fire
I dont use that version of Ubuntu anymore this was in 2013 so thats six
Ubuntu releases back. Chris Coulson or someone from the Ubuntu Mozilla
Team should confirm since this is a downstream bug thats marked
confirmed still.
Their bug squad would mark it invalid if it was no longer present.
Either
lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
>
--
Benjamin Kerensa
http://benjaminkerensa.com
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
This seems like what the Mozilla Guides program does. Also what is the need
for a module for a Facebook group?
We have a lot of initiatives at Mozilla and not a module for everyone.
Generally there should be some reasoning behind the need for a module.
Are you working with the participation team
that coupled with
the anonymity of this
email really makes this email disruptive versus productive.
“we also would like to thank Benjamin Kerensa, Emma Irwin and Majken
Connor for all
the efforts they take in making things more transparent.“
Thanks for appreciating our efforts for transparency but on
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Yvan Boily wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Benjamin Kerensa
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Byron Jones wrote:
>> > Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The de facto standard p
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Byron Jones wrote:
> Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
>>
>> The de facto standard place seems to be http://logs.glob.uno/ (CC'ing
>> glob, who AFAIK is running this). I don't know if there's interest in
>> moving that somewhere more mozilla-official-y.
>
>
> there's been som
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> On 28/01/2015 19:52, Fred Wenzel wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So, strawman (which IMO is reasonable): can we check irc.m.o for
>>> currently-public channels with 10 or more people in that
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Mike Hoye wrote:
> On 2015-01-27 12:59 PM, Patrick Cloke wrote:
>>
>>
>> From (kind of) following this thread it seems that the argument really
>> boils down to whether it should be opt-in or opt-out.
>
> I'd intended this request to be only for product- and proje
The justification is that we are doing it wrong by defaulting to
closed decision making where not everyone can transparently see all
the discussions we have in the project.
Great post that talks about this discussion btw and the importance of open:
http://stormyscorner.com/2015/01/working-in-the-o
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-or
--
Benjamin Kerensa
http://benjaminkerensa.com
"I am what I am because of who we all are" - Ubuntu
--
Ubuntu-us-or mailing list
Ubuntu-us-or@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-or
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Patrick Cloke wrote:
> On 1/26/2015 12:48 PM, Larissa Shapiro wrote:
>>
>> I would also like bots to notify people when they join a public channel
>> that it is being logged. I think that’s already happening in some places.
>
>
> Please don't do this. There's alrea
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Chris Ilias wrote:
> On 2015-01-25 1:31 PM, Majken Connor wrote:
>>
>> 1. Trying to keep up with a project by reading IRC logs (or watching
>> meeting videos) is a lot to ask for many people. This takes a lot of time
>> and someone could end up spending all their d
channels by default and recorded by default.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Benjamin Kerensa
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Majken Connor wrote:
>> I skimmed, so forgiveness please in advance if I am repeating points already
>> made...
>>
>> This isn&#x
e who are there to catch a conversation or those who persistently
stay connected and log privately.
>
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:51:01PM -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>> > It can be if we want to
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Yvan Boily wrote:
> No, the scope is clearly stated with "Mozilla’s Data Privacy Principles
> continue to inform how we build our products and services, manage user
> data, and select and interact with partners – while shaping our public
> policy and advocacy work
https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
> > Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
> > What I was walling in or walling out,
> > And to whom I was like to give offense.
> > - Robert Frost, Mending Wal
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Benjamin Kerensa
> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> What does everyone think about logging irc channels for both transparency
>> and accountability but also to ensure compliance
>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Yvan Boily wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Benjamin Kerensa > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Gavin Sharp
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I should perhaps clarify, though, that I don'
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
> I should perhaps clarify, though, that I don't really think there's a
> need for a project-wide policy to enforce that channels must be
> logged, and that's probably what Yvan is reacting strongly to. Most of
> the important public IRC channel
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Ravi Pina wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:34:16PM -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Yvan Boily wrote:
> >
> > Can I ask if you think mailing lists should be private?
> > https://lists.mozilla.or
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Yvan Boily wrote:
> I received a message off list responding to my comments. Rather than
> duplicating a message intended off-list (ironically referencing the need to
> avoid private discussions :D), I will summarize the points and address them.
>
> 1. irc loggin
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Yvan Boily wrote:
> Not to beat a dead horse here, but again, there is a difference between
> "This is a public service, that might be logged" and "This is a public
> service that is logged and published."
>
> One is a notice that people might be logging, the othe
1 - 100 of 1619 matches
Mail list logo
