> > I strongly agree with the sentiment that we should strive to be more open > > where possible and where openness will help us collectively act in the > > interests of the mission. My belief is that's going to be a much easier > > conversation to have once we have a workable taxonomy we can look at and > > discuss. Given that, I'd like to propose that we table this conversation > > until that taxonomy is ready for discussion. > > Is there an identified group working on this taxonomy? Is it part of > their quarterly goals? Are there ways to track their progress, and > provide input into their workings? > > (Without those things, all the above runs the risk of sounding like > "We're going to apply stop energy to this improvement because we are > doing a bigger change which may actually never happen.") >
I would add are these taxonomy discussions open to Mozillians under NDA? Can other staff who might be interested participate? _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
