That's not how things work and no Brendan hasnt been involved in the project for years.
Mozilla's Board of Directors don't get involved in bugs and I can tell you that your not going to get any escalation by emailing here. Module owner has the final say and you've indicated you already went that route so you exhausted all your options. On Feb 23, 2017 2:30 PM, "Douglas Crosher" <dtc-...@scieneer.com> wrote: Hi Benjamin, Last time I looked I believe Brendan still had the final say, so I find that hard to believe. I would like to hear that from the Mozilla Directors? I would like to see some accommodation for the performance use cases, and it does not seem a big thing to ask and something that would benefit the web. This might require some new split in responsibilities so that everyone can get along, and some more objective agreed metrics for 'merit'. Regards Douglas Crosher On 02/24/2017 08:41 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > There is no escalation if the module owner and decision makers in the > bug have made a decision. > > It appears you've exhausted your options. > > On Feb 23, 2017 1:23 PM, "Douglas Crosher via governance" > <governance@lists.mozilla.org <mailto:governance@lists.mozilla.org>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to bring the following review decision to the attention of > the community and to ask how such matters can be escalated: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060 > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342060> > > It is not just the decision that I dispute, I am not happy with the > process leading to this decision, and development has been ongoing for > around two years now and I first started contributing to the general > area of the work (asm.js at that time year before that). > > I dispute that Mozilla Corp can demonstrate the merit of the decision. I > have raised the problems with the CEO Chris on two occasions, and > recently with the module owner without response. I believe there is > merit in the objections, and that I can demonstrate better performance > and a better plan. Where does that leave the Mozilla community and > governance based on merit? Do I just give up and not bother? > > My impression of working on this project is that Mozilla Corp dictated > the decisions, and one reason given was that the critical issue was > getting agreement between the web browsers but this would seem to assume > that the Firefox community has no representation for the product. > > I was not consulted before the creation of the WebAssembly CG, the group > many never have been given a choice on how the Chairs were appointed, > and in the end I am just ignored. > > I could demonstrate better performance at the start of the process and > better performance now, and can articulate a development plan. > > Regards > Douglas Crosher > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org <mailto:governance@lists.mozilla.org> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance> > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
