Not publicly no :) and that's why I suggest a nda-confidential or mozillians-confidential. I would like to see more public too but for the most part the ones I run into and have to be cc'ed on or ask about are operational stuff but not something that demands company-confidential over mozillians - confidential.
On Apr 13, 2015 5:25 AM, "Gijs Kruitbosch" <gijskruitbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 13/04/2015 05:46, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: >> >> In the cases of things that truly need to be company-confidential then >> those could still be marked but unless a strong justification could be >> given for flagging company-confidential then >> >> bugs that would ordinarily be made company-confidential would be >> mozillian-confidential. >> >> Thoughts? > > > Overall, I think we overuse company-confidential and I would prefer that more bugs became public. > > Can you give a few examples of the types of bugs where you believe company-confidential is wrong and yet they can't be public? > > ~ Gijs > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
