The justification is that we are doing it wrong by defaulting to closed decision making where not everyone can transparently see all the discussions we have in the project.
Great post that talks about this discussion btw and the importance of open: http://stormyscorner.com/2015/01/working-in-the-open-is-hard.html Simply put we have a commitment to our users, partners, contributors and staff to stay true to our principles (see 7 and 8) and in the spirit of transparency and building free software taking this step is totally inline with those principles. I think the question we really need to ask is where else are we not defaulting to open and how can we change that and be more true to our manifesto? On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:30 PM, <mer...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Jumping on this late... > > Putting aside the question of what logging is currently occurring, we want to > ensure that any logging that could occur as a matter of policy - and any data > collection, retention, and sharing generally - satisfies a specific, material > need and is limited to what is required to satisfy that need. > > With that as context, it seems a number of you have identified legitimate > benefits here but, by my read of this thread, I don't see that the > justifications are sufficient to motivate any change. > > Marshall > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
