I agree and it's disappointing when the first thread on Pocket was discussed here Mozilla said there was no money deal to integrate pocket but recently a VP at Mozilla admitted Mozilla is getting paid to integrate Pocket.
That's a breach of trust to the users and Mozillians to publicly not state the truth on why a feature was added. We already saw tiles was a bad mistake so how many months until Mozilla realizes Pocket was too? -- Benjamin Kerensa http://benjaminkerensa.com | @bkerensa on Twitter On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:47 AM a <worldpeaceha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please don't include proprietary service integration in Firefox core. > Things like this and Encrypted Media Extensions should be Firefox > extensions, presumably bundled with the browser but completely removable. > The reading list feature worked great, I want it back. Pocket is visually > ugly, and just displays a blank screen when I click on the button. I don't > need more buttons, for goodness' sake. And, you're basically making the > browser an advert for Pocket premium. That's bad in the same way that > having a default search engine is bad. I install ad blocker for a reason. > And, why the H--L am I having to complain on Google Groups, instead of > something open source? I'm not exactly going to quit using Firefox because > all the other options suck very very hard, but, AAARRGH. > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
