That would be pretty time consuming to do an across the board audit. I think the thing is Mozilla is a corporation at the end of the day and not everyone it hires cares about the manifesto or open source and so working in the open is not a priority and defaulting to corporate norms is something that just happens.
I've seen this happen where a employee who just started working in the open leaves and is replaced by a new hire with a corporate background who defaults the work that was already being done in the open back to closed. Anyways to the point of bugs I think their needs to be some criteria for what should and should not be company-confidential. I think we need a new - confidential group added as a less restrictive level and with criteria and go from there. On Apr 13, 2015 10:17 AM, "Majken Connor" <maj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd love to see a formal audit. Like, have some team go through and figure > out where are all these policies, who does what in private and why do they > do it in private? I wonder if anyone in the organization has a complete > view like this? > > I'm not opposed to things needing to be private, but it should be > consistent, and it should be explained why it can't be. > > I think also if there were a group starting off with an audit, then that > could also be the start of a group that helps try to "solve" for some > things that we wish are public, but don't have a good plan around how to do > that well. > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch <gijskruitbo...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > On 13/04/2015 05:46, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > > > >> In the cases of things that truly need to be company-confidential then > >> those could still be marked but unless a strong justification could be > >> given for flagging company-confidential then > >> > >> bugs that would ordinarily be made company-confidential would be > >> mozillian-confidential. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > > > > Overall, I think we overuse company-confidential and I would prefer that > > more bugs became public. > > > > Can you give a few examples of the types of bugs where you believe > > company-confidential is wrong and yet they can't be public? > > > > ~ Gijs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > governance mailing list > > governance@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > governance@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
