.spamassassin directory exists inside it, but no files are in
there. If I remove SQL functionality (don't use -q or -x) then it creates
the whitelist files iside the users directory and life is good.
Please let me know if there is anything I should try.
23]: clean message (-2/5) for
signal:99 in 5 seconds.
Mar 27 19:35:31 spamassasin spamd[24987]: connection from
mercury.shreve.net [ 208.206.76.23 ] at port 3993
Mar 27 19:35:31 spamassasin spamd[25032]: Still running as root: user not
specified, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
(like on
the unix server) so that users using pine etc can have that same
functionaality?
Brian
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Michael Moncur wrote:
> Here's a revised version of the procmail stuff I use to add X-message-flag
> headers with spam reports so that Outlook can view them.
>
well yeah, I do that but thats not going to sort the mail in that dir. I
didn't know if there was a way for formail to open the box and re-order
the messages.
Brian
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, dman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:02:50AM -0600, Brian wrote:
>
> | Is there a p
etc. I had posted an error about it a while back but no one really
commented. I am just trying to get at least another party to confirm they
see the same thing before I run off and report to bugzilla.
Brian
---
Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036e: [EMAIL
s in set relay for 127.0.0.6
> debug: checking RBL results in set relay for 127.0.0.4
> Cannot create tmp lockfile //.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock : No such
> file or directory
>
>
> _
But it is mutually exclusive. If you use SQL, you can in no way shape or
form use AWL, it won't work. You can't use them both at the same time
with the current code, so thats mutually exclusive.
Brian
On 4 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Not really mutually exclusive, just
Yes, in a previous message I included the code breakdown of Pauls
explaination of why this is so.
Brian
On 4 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> Really? That's unexpected. You should be able to use both, as long as
> you specify some auto_whitelist_path which exists, which pro
I used postgresql, wasn't a problem, but you have to re-do the table
schema since its mysqlish.
Brian
On 8 Apr 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Haven't set it up yet, but you'll need DBD::Pg
>
> LER
>
>
> On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 22:23, Jay Hodges wrote:
>
I hate to clutter the
landscape with trash.
Thanks fo any help
Brian
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_
which
is why im writing this)
Any help would be appreciated. I think that since
its using this sendmail file to relay that its not getting to procmail to be
piped to spamassassin. but how can i fix that?
Brian
I have white_list(ed) *@mydomain.com
Spam comes in from someone claiming to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anyway to stop this?
Keep the "envelope", comapare it with the message header or something?
TIA,
Brian
**Please Note**
There is a very slight c
Quinn,
We run two very high volume servers here as well, and have seen the exact
same thing happening, spamd dies, with nothing logged. This is only on
2.42.
Brian
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Quinn Vallance wrote:
> I maintain two relatively high volume mail servers both of which have
>
Yes but if you start comparing prices between companies that offer basic
no-frills consumer DSL as well as "business class" DSL where the only
difference is no blocked ports and maybe a handfull of IP's, you'll notice
Speakeasy's Residential no-frills consumer DSL with dynamic IP starts at
abou
Greg, please don't think that you know everything...
SBC DSL FAQ states:
Question:
Can I run dedicated servers with DSL Internet access service?
Answer: Answer last updated: 05-02-02
Yes, as long as you have a static IP address. The best part of DSL
Internet access service is that the larg
thing).(com|net|org|info)?rid=[0-9]{1,5}
???
Regards
/Brian
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in An
Maybe they'll start writting in Middle English to target that untapped market
of english lit majors/grads.
On Friday 30 January 2004 08:55 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Today I got an interesting form of obfuscation, apparently to avoid
> antidrug.cf.
>
> I'm not sure wether to bother with adding rul
reject/report all email to those old addresses, just in case I
might ever receive a legit email there. I just want spamassassin
to tag it as spam, so my mail client can route it into my spambox,
so I can later look at the subject lines and delete them.
|\/| Bria
am providers?
Are there any other ways in which SpamAssassin can be used to make
sending spam less profitable to the people who do it?
|\/| Brian Kendig Set your priorities right.
\ /\ / ..__.brian at enchanter net No one ever said on his
\
r the tip! But I'm having trouble figuring out how to
have my spams automatically forwarded to SpamCop.
In my .procmailrc I put this recipe:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
{
:0 c
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:0
/Users/brian/spambox
}
But about half of the SpamCop acknowledgements I get
ear to be
in effect, but email which ought to be triggering my custom rules
(and was before I switched to spamd) isn't triggering it. spamd is
running with my userid, so there are no permissions problems at
work here.
How do I put my custom rules into effect again?
|\/|
IL PROTECTED]'" line added to
its body.
If my .procmailrc calls /usr/bin/spamc instead, then the email is
still processed, but it won't have that 'old address' line added to
the score.
Am I setting up something wrong, or is this a SpamAssassin bug?
|\/|
Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Brian,
> did you restart spamd after adding the allow_user_rules line to
> local.cf?
Yup. I've rebooted the machine since then, too. I've verified
that the 'allow_user_rules 1' line is in local.cf, that my custom
rule is in '~/.
I know something like this was discussed here a few days ago.. but I didn't
see a resolution to the problem.
I've been using spamassassin for a while now.. and I love it.. removed all
of my procmail spam recipes..
Anyway.. as soon as I switched to spamd/spamc my auto-whitelist.db, which
SHOULD
Are there any step-by-step FAQs or HowTos on implementing SpamAssassin on a
relay server and does anyone currently have this implemented? Which would be
the easiest to setup/manage with SpamAssassin as a relay box - Exim, Postfix,
Sendmail, Qmail, ...?
Brian Snipes
Maybe for you! heh. someone had to say it..
Congrats Craig...
Brian
---
Groom Killed By Stripper's Boobs
Wednesday January 16, 2002
"Those breasts were lethal weapons," he told reporters.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Cline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Thats why in spam assassin you can set the scores yourself... fit them for
your needs..
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Winters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 8:43 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny score
3.14159 is the begining of Pi... I don't think M$ would be that cute about
its version number..
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Patrice Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 3:10 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] OutLook Expres
How would an auto white list db file get created if my only command line to
spamd is -d and spamc has no arguments? I'm kinda stumped on this one...
the only entry in there is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian
___
Don't miss the 2
Has anyone seen this header before? Google had no matches.
X-Stormpost-To:
It was one of the headers of spam that got through...
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- htt
The person emailing me had what they wanted to say in the subject line,
and I guess the email server added this little ditty on at sendtime...
from bakernet.com
start here and go to the end. ---
This is an email from Baker & McKenzie, solicitors. The contents of this
email are confidential t
Not to nitpick, but that is most languages.. if you don't know how to use
the languange.. its kinda hard to make it do what you want it to do... :)
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bryan
Hoover
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002
You know.. I make my living writing code in VB.. and I must say it pisses me
off when people say that VB coders are "dumb". For personal use, I write
code in perl, PHP, C and yes VB.
What are your reasons for calling VB coders dumb? Please reply off list.
-Original Message-
From: [EM
Was there supposed to be a Makefile.PL is the tar.gz file?
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:48 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] [SA-announce] Deersoft Emerges to Combat Spam
Press Re
spamd/.spamassassin/ ??
I'm using SpamAssassin v2.55
Regards,
/Brian
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win
I've raised it to 60 MB
now... But do I risk getting more "out of memory" errors with this setting
??
Regards,
/Brian
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Por
e?
What I can see happening, though, is spammers start using a "salt" so that
the entire string is effectively random.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
from someone who has received heaps of these emails
in recent times.
Brian Scott
BTW it is impossible for the messages to be generated through any
agents installed on my systems. The technical details are complex but
no, I do not have a virus on my Macintosh.
--
Seen this?
http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/964/
SA comes out pretty well, although it was run without the bayes db.
Cheers
Brian
--
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk
www.theonlineorganiser.com
www.thepersonalknowledgebase.com
Moderator for Mitel SMEserver Contributions and Howtos
?
Regards,
/Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http
k out this Limited Time Offer:
http://pharma-wholesale.24hhosting.com/
[Mail Body Quote off]
I assume you need to check for the V-word ;-) - assuming, that the spammers
might put a space, a star or a '-' between the letters... What would such a
rule look like
I though this was freaking funny... I've been reporting spam to the UCE
address for over 6 months, then today I get this (over 200 of them)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host arcticfox.ftc.gov[164.62.7.14] said: 550 5.7.1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Rejected:< mydlsIP> listed at
dialups.relays.osirusof
By all means do it! :) ... but it won't help that there are still servers
that use the rbl directly from sendmail or postfix and the like.. :(
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECT
Yea.. I guess if I didn't get email for an hour I would wonder whats
up.. but you gotta wonder about the people who start to wonder after a
few days... heh..
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 20:34, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> > By all means do it! :) ... but it won't help that there are still
> > servers
> > t
Your system is being killed by Linux's OOM killer. The OOM killer in 2.4
series doesn't appear to be all that bright and I have had it kill init in
the past which results in what you describe (pings but services down).
You basically have two options, either add more memory or limit the number of
esian database - and maybe own
customized filters.
The problem is, that the domain is not hosted locally on the box running SA
and QS - but are relayed to the respective right mail-servers (the box with
SA and QS acts only as a anti-virus and spam-identification box).
Anyone
or sa-learn --spam.
If the Message-ID is already learnt as spam I'd like to be able to
modify the filter to bin the spam and then I need not review these
messages.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
.mimetmp
Description: PGP signature
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
also tried to create the file first but still got same
> error.
Are you using spamd with the -x argument? If so that might prevent the
creation of user prefs. I get the same error here when running sa-learn
but it does not stop SA working for me. spamc is called by exim running
as user 'mail'
spec file, updated the rpms, identifies as 2.60-rc4
AFAICS.
Slip up,or maybe I'm still running rc4 and the rpm -U failed?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ain, so
false positives can and do occur. If you delete the mail then, no
possibility to recover it again.
--
Brian Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do you know how far this has gone?
just how damaged have I bec
y does not yet have 2.60 SA code in it AFAIAA.
--
Brian Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do you know how far this has gone?
just how damaged have I become?
'Even Deeper' by
/razor-agent.log was last written to on
September 12th. This was the date I installed SA 2.60-rc4, so something
has stopped calling razor AFAICS.
Is this the Perl taint code effect?
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:30:39 +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:55:37 +0200 in
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Antoine Jacoutot
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> OK, here is my complete log; it does show lines about razor, but
>> there's nothing in my razor
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:38:48 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brian Morrison"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will try again with the latest Razor patch in the 2.60 release version
> of SA.
Razor now patched correctly with contents of 2.60 Razor2.patch file, SA
now returning Razo
der is changed to :
.
End result, blank mail, because the MIME boundaries in the body don't
match the boundary definition in the header any more.
Not sure who to report this bug to within whoever is now responsible for
InterMail.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this cause sa-learn, and razor
reporting to behave differently?
Thanks
Brian
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 13:45:54 -0500 (CDT) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Robert A.
Hayden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few things I can recommend that speed things up:
>
> 1) Turn off RBL lookups
How much additional spam did you want to have to look at?
--
Brian Morrison
e ignorance.
It's in the tarball...
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
replaced when the real
released package is installed.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
xactly is the best way to turn it "off by
default" and then allow filtering on just [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
-Brian
ools.rpm
perl-Mail-SpamAssassin.rpm, then all dependencies are settled in one go.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See t
tered except
for users A and B...a way of rolling it as suggested in the usage document.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That would depend on where you put the call to spamassassin. and how you
> integrate SA into your mail system.
>
> Brian Nath
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
some of the configuration options have changed, I had to change
report_header myself
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net
ISP's mail
server, though I too am seeing a problem with some emails matching the
DYNABLOCK rule despite being sent through their ISP's mail server. I had to
go ahead and rescore the rule down to .1 because it was causing too much
trouble (but I do want to see when it matches for diagnost
Out of curiosity, what method do you use to feed your email into
SpamAssassin? Do you use a milter with Sendmail, procmail, et al.?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Daniel M. Drucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk
For the record I also began noticing many more 100% Bayesian matches after
upgrading from 2.55 to 2.6. So far it hasn't resulted in any false
positives that I'm aware of, but it has left me feeling slightly uneasy.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Ben Wing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
ined in some instances. What is the proper thing to do when $1 is
undefined? Return out of the subroutine?
-Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We
mAssassin 2.60 on RedHat 9.0. perl-DB_FILE is installed.
Any thoughts?
Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and hel
Hi, Mark.
These aren't messages that you've already fed to the Bayesian classifier,
are they? Once it learns a message feeding it through again wont cause it
to learn it again.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Mark Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27,
y hints on what could be the problem ??
Regards,
Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
Y
y hints on what could be the problem ??
Regards,
Brian
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
Y
ies.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id
hA3GIPq0087830
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:18:25 -0500 (EST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:18:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: testing
Me
The only trusted network should be that of mail-gateway.metrologic.com which
is my MTA. Katie.darklegacies.com is a host on a dynamic IP which is not a
trusted host. Therefore I would expect mail submitted to my MTA from
katie.darklegacies.com to match DYNABLOCK, yet it does not.
Brian
output when the email was processed by spamd with
debugging turned on.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Sneddon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK FP?
I'm running SpamAssassin 2.60 on a p
http://www.claraocr.org/
http://freshmeat.net/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
Spamassassin-tal
RUSOFT_COM,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,REMOVE_SUBJ,
X_NJABL_DIALUP version=2.55X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55
(1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Regards,
/Brian
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David
DicksonSen
http://pyzor.sourceforge.net
Thanks for this. When is "pyzor discover" normally run?
Cheers
Brian
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk
www.theonlineorganiser.com
www.thepersonalknowledgebase.com
Moderator for Mitel SMEserver Contributions and Howtos: www.contribs.org
From: "Fox Flanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:30 am, Fox Flanders wrote:
> We need a prounouncability test of the sender addresses. If it has a bunch
> of ixf38jk3 crud in it, it is more likely to be spam.
>
The irony is astounding.
--
Hi-
I have SA working really well with procmail & IMAP (delivery via dmail).
There is only one more thing I would like to do: When spam is moved to
the spam folder, I want it automatically marked as read.
Is this possible? How?
Brian
--
Brian Klug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TYX.NET Webhosting $
hat worked terrific. Thank you!
For anyone else interested, heres my .procmailrc line:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| formail -I "Status: R" | dmail +Spam
Cheers,
Brian
--
Brian Klug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TYX.NET Webhostin
You know that's implying that spammers as "bright" as the average
script-kiddie? Isn't that being a bit generous?
/tongue in cheek
On Tuesday 29 July 2003 03:36 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> yes -- now and again.
>
> They're not really from Korea and China -- those are open proxies
> or rooted machi
I'm sure this can be site specific... :)
- Original Message -
From: "Kip Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bart Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] s/SPAM/spam/ it seems
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
enough to be
worth the effort.
I know that email can only be bounced at the server level, before
the server accepts it for delivery... but I know that some email
programs (like Mac OS X Mail) can 'fake' a bounce message that
looks authentic.
|\/| Brian Kendig
Is there anyway we can add the version number of the release to the man
pages? I know this seems kind of silly, but I just removed some very old man
pages from /usr/share/man/man1 I think they were dated 6/15/02 or 01, but
it would be MUCH easier to tell if I was looking atthe correct man pages i
be to this list, please simply disregard
> this message. Send questions to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Fahrländer Linux Zealot, Conservative, and Technomad
Evansville, INMy Voyage: http://www.CounterMoon.com
ICQ 5119262
---
amAssassin 2.43,
SA-Exim 2.1. All the latest versions as far as I know.
|\/| Brian Kendig Set your priorities right.
\ /\ / ..__.brian at enchanter net No one ever said on his
\/ \__\ _/ http://www.enchanter.net/ death bed, "Gee, if I'd
\__ __ \_
too? How do I get spamd to use the
rules I set up for it in local.cf?
|\/| Brian Kendig Set your priorities right.
\ /\ / ..__.brian at enchanter net No one ever said on his
\/ \__\ _/ http://www.enchanter.net/ death bed, "Gee, if I'd
\__ __ \_
now thats funny! :) You mean someone likes SpamAssassin?
- Original Message -
From: Someone Likes You
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:35 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] You have a secret admirer
Guess what... You've got a secret admirer!
Want to find out who? Just click
> Spamassassin-talk -- confirmation of subscription -- request 804694
>
> We have received a request from 217.158.211.83 for subscription of
> your email address, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, to the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. To confirm the
> request, please send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:55:06 trillian spamd[1037]: debug: leaving helper-app run
mode
But NOWHERE can I find anything on Razor running or not. My
razor-agent.log is also NOT be written to.
Can someone point me to any hints?
Thanks
Brian
---
This sf.net email is
With Bayesian enabled.. wouldn't it have a higher hit count? I didn't see
that in your list of test matches...
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: RE
Fine by me.. they aren't using my baysien databases.. SA-2.50-cvs... I love
you. err umm.. yeah.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:42 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Anti
So this line doesn;t bother you at all?
>> Diagnostic-Code: 501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain must exist
or
>> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
>>
>> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
>> recipients. This is a perma
Yes, something addded it, but it wasn't SpamAssassin.
- Original Message -
From: "Drav Sloan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Arne Fischer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, Decembe
have been
fixed, but dcc works fine))
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Allison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamassassin-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 5:06 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] 2.50 question
> My apologies if this was alre
false
positives would rise... the only thing I can think of is store those types
of emails and see if the images are located at the same server... Razor
might pick up the email... may not.. *shrug*
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Loiterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm very happy with the bayes and other additions for 2.50-cvs.. I've been
running it for the past 2 weeks... and I have had only 3 false positives
(which where spam, but from sources I wanted email from). Can't wait for
the release!
---
This
Did you request the email?
Is the email something that you want?
If you answered No, SPAM.
If you answered Yes, ham.
for me.. SPAM.
- Original Message -
From: "Ross Vandegrift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:59 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Is this
Did you request the email?
Is the email something that you want?
If you answered No, SPAM.
If you answered Yes, ham.
for me.. SPAM.
- Original Message -
From: "Ross Vandegrift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 10:59 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Is this
-- URI: URL of page called "remove"
* 0.3 -- URI: 'remove' URL contains an email address
* 0.2 -- URI: Includes a 'remove' email address
* 0.9 -- 'Message-Id' was added by a relay (3)
* 1.2 -- message body is 25-50% uppercase
----- Original Messa
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
