Yes, but like I said, if they were from someone I didn't know, it would have
been spam. Think of it this way, it's spam that I want.
The email that I get, isn't always personal chit-chat. it's bands trying to
promote their shows and sometimes merch. So maybe 10% of the emails that I
get, if you were to receive them, you may consider spam. Most of the email,
the bands have put me on their list without me asking, which is fine with
me...
Here's SA headers from an email that I wanted, but I didn't request... So
in all fairness.. it is spam.. but once I add it to the whitelist, it will
never be caught again..
here's the SA headers:
* 1.3 -- From: does not include a real name
* 0.5 -- BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list
* 0.3 -- BODY: Asks you to click below
* 0.5 -- BODY: BAYES_80
[score: 0.8385]
* 0.7 -- URI: URL of page called "remove"
* 0.3 -- URI: 'remove' URL contains an email address
* 0.2 -- URI: Includes a 'remove' email address
* 0.9 -- 'Message-Id' was added by a relay (3)
* 1.2 -- message body is 25-50% uppercase
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.50-cvs
> "Brian May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm very happy with the bayes and other additions for 2.50-cvs.. I've
been
> > running it for the past 2 weeks... and I have had only 3 false positives
> > (which where spam, but from sources I wanted email from). Can't wait
for
> > the release!
>
> If you wanted it, it's not spam so it counts against our accuracy
> ratio. :-)
>
> --
> Daniel Quinlan Linux, open source, and
> http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ anti-spam consulting
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
