[SAtalk] Re: filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:35:49 -0800, Gary Funck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk: >> Use Postfix+amavisd-new+SpamAssassin -- and user D_DISCARD to drop the >> spam on the gateway. > What are the pros/cons of using sendmail+MIMEDefang+SA versus > Postfix+amavisd-new+SpamAssassin? C

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

Downloading --- Pick it up from: http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.gz http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.bz2 http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.zip md5sum: 6521ad3e6ed5a2eba35476c43c1697b7 Mail-SpamAssassin-

[SAtalk] not receiving SA list traffic ????

I seem to not be receiving any talk on this list. Is there a problem? Am I just lonely? :) Mairhtin O'Feannag --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up fo

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:52:17PM -0500, Jack Gostl wrote: > > Possible, but which database? We have many users all with their own? Also, > > if its a trashed Bayes db, why does the message go away when I restart > > spamd? > > If you just went to 2.6

Re: [SAtalk] DB_File

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David B Funk wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: > > > > My bet is that your Bayes database got trashed. > > > > Possible, but which database? We have many users all with their own? Also, > > if its a trashed Bayes db, why does the message go away when I restart > >

Re: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

on 12/8/03 10:34 PM, Matt Kettler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The very same. However, I didnt know the name SpamAssassin was trademarked.. >> -JR > > Yep, it was trademarked by Deersoft, and now owned by McAfee following > their acquisition of Deersoft. Crap! I hope McAfee does not get the i

[SAtalk] Subject line consideration

Had a conversation with a rather intelligent user of email who had an inciteful question/remark about sorting his spam. I thought I would pass it along here as it seemed like a potentially good idea. Eventually this turns into a request for a code change. I could do this, but I hate the idea

RE: [SAtalk] Subject line consideration

You could just try: subject_tag [SPAM-_HITS_] In your spamassassin local.cf Which will give you something like: [SPAM-5.76] {rest of subject} [SPAM-13.80] {rest of subject} Your mail client can then sort on subject and the scores will be in order. Alan -Original Message

[SAtalk] [RD] Help with Subject rule

Hello Folks, I wanted to test a theory so I've been trying to come up with a rule that will catch encoded strings in the subject of a message. So far I've tried the rules below, but none of them are hitting. Any suggestions? rawbody T_SBJT_ENC /^Subject: ?=\?(us\-ascii|iso\-8859\-1|windows\-12

Re: [SAtalk] Habeas test

At 01:27 AM 12/9/03 -0500, Jeremy Kister wrote: It seems that spamassassin 2.60 requires all 9 Habeas fields to be included, in order, in the header of an email, for it to recognize the Habeas mark. While contacting Habeas support about a semi-related issue, I was informed that spamassassin should

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Help with Subject rule

At 07:13 AM 12/9/03 -0500, Scott Sprunger wrote: I wanted to test a theory so I've been trying to come up with a rule that will catch encoded strings in the subject of a message. So far I've tried the rules below, but none of them are hitting. Any suggestions? rawbody type rules have already had

[SAtalk] A "Out of memory" case

Please allow me to report about an "Out of memory" case which occured on a system here. RedHat Linux 9.0, all available patches applied amavisd-new-20030616-p6 SpamAssassin version 2.60 The problem becomes known as the system was not more operable because of nearly infinite swapping activities. "

Re: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

> > Yep, it was trademarked by Deersoft, and now owned by McAfee following > > their acquisition of Deersoft. > > > Crap! I hope McAfee does not get the idea to start licensing SA. That would > suck! can't license what they don't own... but they could 'try' to piss off the world and make SpamAssas

[SAtalk] Re: Generic V-whatever drug with no GV rule hits (fwd)

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:25:49 -0600 (CST), David B Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ie: V...i..a.gr..a > > > > > > As I suggested in my email, there's lots of combinations that spammers > > > can do to avoid the original rule. There's also lots of ways to > > > construct the rule to get a broa

RE: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

> > Yep, it was trademarked by Deersoft, and now owned by > McAfee following > > their acquisition of Deersoft. > > > Crap! I hope McAfee does not get the idea to start licensing > SA. That would suck! Now that the name SpamAssassin is getting to be known as the premier product on the market

[SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

Hi, I'm in the process of implementing Spamassain on my Debain machine. I've installed itand got it working in a fairly simple fashion, and now I'm trying to ad in some options. I've got Razor working, and my next goal os to get DCC working. I was unable to locate a Debian package for this, so I b

[SAtalk] 2.61

During the install I got this error, not sure what it means. t/spamd_portok t/spamd_protocol_10.dubious Test returned status -1 (wstat 139, 0x8b) DIED. FAILED tests 1-10 Failed 10/10 tests, 0.00% okay t/spamd_report..ok -- Jack Gostl [EM

[SAtalk] RE: Subject line consideration

Yes, this is what I do and I describe all the details in this section of my "Reverse Spam Fitlering: Winning Without Fighting" page: Start reading at the image of the key where it says One of the keys to my deflexion strategy is to have the spam

[SAtalk] Header problems

Hi, i'm experiencing a strabge problem using Spamassassassin (2.60).. It recognizes a mail as spam, rewrite message (using the rule from safe_report 1) but adds its header with wrong X-Spam-Status.. Any idea?? Luca PS:look at message attached From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 18:17:14 2003 X-U

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David B Funk wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > We've got SA 2.60 running on a Solaris 8 box with SunONE Messaging > > Server. It is doing spam scanning for all our users (~7000). In > > order to keep the system as speedy as possible, I've configured t

RE: [SAtalk] Header problems

> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 > tests=BAYES_50,BIZ_TLD,CASHCASHCASH, > DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONT_BIG, > HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 The message was not spammy enough to trigger SA. Your bayes gave it a neutral value

Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

DCC has been one of the more difficult things for me to setup, but I like it a lot. You need to run only one of the dcc programs, depending on your needs. Run dccd if you want to be a DCC server and you have registered on the dcc network. Or run as an anonymous connection either dccm for a sen

[SAtalk] Combine 2 Bayes DB ???

Is there any way to combine 2 Bayes databases ? I have been running sa-learn with as a different user than what I'm using for spamd and now I find that I have 2 Bayes databases (bayes_seen, bayes_toks). I have run sa-learn on a few hundred spam mail and I really don't want to lose it (the emai

[SAtalk] reject messages

I am a baby to spamassassin and before I start getting my hands dirty on it I am still collecting information about it. No Spam Today for windows (which implements spamassassin engine) has an option that rejects the emails tagged as spam, so it tells the sender that the email was never recei

Re: [SAtalk] A "Out of memory" case

At 01:26 PM 12/9/03 +0100, Claude Frantz wrote: Please allow me to report about an "Out of memory" case which occured on a system here. RedHat Linux 9.0, all available patches applied amavisd-new-20030616-p6 SpamAssassin version 2.60 Please read the release notes for 2.61, which just came out. T

Re: [SAtalk] RE: Subject line consideration

> Yes, this is what I do and I describe all the details in this > section of my "Reverse Spam Fitlering: Winning Without Fighting" > page: > > > > Start reading at the image of the key where it says > This looks great. Thank you ---

RE: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

At 08:38 AM 12/9/03 -0500, Bill wrote: Now that the name SpamAssassin is getting to be known as the premier product on the market you can be sure they are going to start using the name on a commercial product. I also expect to see them sue the open-source developers in the near future over the name

[SAtalk] IMAP only?

I was using procmail to run spamassassin, but our mail server has been changed to run the Cyrus IMAP server (with sieve) on a system where no one has a login. In such a case, any suggestions on the best way to run spamassassin? I've looked at imapassassin (

Re: [SAtalk] reject messages

At 10:01 AM 12/9/03 -0500, gentian wrote: Is such a thing possible with SpamAssassin and some other combinations in Redhat ?? Yes, this is largely a function of whatever tool you integrate SA with.. I'd suggest trying a mitler-level tool which can do this kind of thing by 550ing the message at d

RE: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

Has anyone considered changing the spelling? Just changing the last i to an e (spamassassen) just might be enough. If you don't then you can expect exactly this type of activity from Mcafee. Considering that Spamassassin is now the "preferred" spam tool for ISPs, and getting some great press, th

RE: [SAtalk] IMAP only?

We use Cyrus, Sendmail, SpamAssassin and Sieve. Sendmail uses an INPUT_MAIL_FILTER directive to send to the milter and thus to SA. Once sendmail gets to calling Cyrus deliver, Sieve is used to move the messages into a spam folder with a rule like the one below. require "fileinto"; if header

Re: [SAtalk] Header problems

At 03:18 PM 12/9/03 +0100, Luca Palazzo wrote: i'm experiencing a strabge problem using Spamassassassin (2.60).. It recognizes a mail as spam, rewrite message (using the rule from safe_report 1) but adds its header with wrong X-Spam-Status.. This is typicaly what happens when you run mail through S

[SAtalk] Trying to skip some messages..

I am wanting to setup that any message from systems within our domain don't get sent to spamd... I have the following in the /etc/procmailrc file: :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ${DEFAULT} # From system.rose-hulman.edu :0: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ${DEFAULT} # This seems to work most of the time we when cer

Re: [SAtalk] Habeas test

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Jeremy Kister wrote: > It seems that spamassassin 2.60 requires all 9 Habeas fields to be included, > in order, in the header of an email, for it to recognize the Habeas mark. I'm just a little curious. There is nothing technically 'magical' about the Habeas headers. They could

[SAtalk] I have encountered a strange problem.

I was using spamassassin in my organization and one user did not want to be included in spam filtering. The spam box is setup for multiple domains that are split between 2 machines. I setup this users email addresses in the global prefs to have ALL_SPAM_TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] I found out the way i

[SAtalk] Bounce / reject e-mail using Postfix with scores above n

I've read about procmail recipes for deleting mail with spam scores above a specified, however I've not seen any mention regarding Postfix. I've implemented the bouncing of e-mail using Postfix's header_checks (with spam score above 10). Add the following to your {/etc/postfix/main.cf}:

RE: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

At 10:42 AM 12/9/03 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: Would you people please get some facts prior to posting senseless blather. Replying to myself, sorry for the sharp-edged tone there. It is however frustrating when you offhandedly mention a simple fact, and people begin jumping to conclusions without

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

1) Will RPM's be out soon? OR 2) It sounds like this release is mostly just rule changes. Is there yet a mechanism (an easy way) to just update rules without going through an 'install' process? Thanks for all the hard work! - Charles On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Justin Mason wrote: > Downloadi

Re: [SAtalk] Combine 2 Bayes DB ???

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:43:48AM -0500, Vee Persaud wrote: > Is there any way to combine 2 Bayes databases ? I have been running sa-learn with > as a different user than what I'm using for spamd and now I find that I have 2 Bayes > databases (bayes_seen, bayes_toks). I have run sa-learn on a

RE: [SAtalk] another SpamAssassin ???

> If you don't then you can expect exactly this type of > activity from Mcafee. > > Considering that Spamassassin is now the "preferred" spam > tool for ISPs, and getting some great press, they would be > stupid not to take this logical step soon. Exactly my point! I have had dealing with thei

[SAtalk] Postfix - procmail - spamassassin config

Hey At least once a week our server hangs. I can't figure this out. It seems to be hanging when spamassassin is working on large emails. Here is how I have it setup and where I am confused. My confusion lies in this. If I use the mailbox_command field in postfix do I need all of below, or wil

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:12:46AM -0500, Charles Gregory wrote: > 1) Will RPM's be out soon? Yes, I'll do up some RPMs soon. > 2) It sounds like this release is mostly just rule changes. >Is there yet a mechanism (an easy way) to just update rules without >going through an 'install' pro

Re: [SAtalk] I have encountered a strange problem.

At 10:59 AM 12/9/03 -0500, Paul Hirschorn wrote: I found out the way it does this is just by initially tagging that users email message as -100 points as soon as it is scanned and also getting auto-learned as a result because it is below the minimum ham score. Is there a bug fix for this Um, what a

Re: [SAtalk] reject messages

Hi, [Note: please set your mailer to wrap lines] On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:01:24 -0500 "gentian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am a baby to spamassassin and before I start getting my hands dirty on > it I am still collecting information about it. > No Spam Today for windows (which implements spamas

Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:34:59AM -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > DCC has been one of the more difficult things for me to setup, but I like it a lot. > > You need to run only one of the dcc programs, depending on your needs. Run dccd if > you want to be a DCC server and you have registered on the

[SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

> Summary of major changes since 2.60 > --- > - updated to reflect new Dynablock DNSBL location Does 2.61 also fix the bugs and problems with DYNABLOCK and NJABL hitting false positives for different header issues and mailserver configs? Just want to make sure b

[SAtalk] upgrade 2.44 to 2.60

I did an upgrade/install from 2.44 to 2.60 and I'm not sure what is going on? I installed 2.60 (tgz file) everything went ok. but had error messages in my mail log telling me that i need 2.44 but running 2.60. I unistalled both versions and reinstalled 2.60 and now it's not working. I'm using

RE: [SAtalk] IMAP only?

Scott, Thanks for the response, but I have no access to our e-mail server other than IMAP. So, I don't think I can tell sendmail to use the milter that runs SA. On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:58, Scott Sprunger wrote: > We use Cyrus, Sendmail, SpamAssassin and Sieve. > > Sendmail uses an INPUT_MAIL

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

> -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:18 AM > To: Charles Gregory > Cc: Justin Mason; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released! > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:12:46AM -0500, Charles Grego

[SAtalk] SA 2.61 Install Issue

I'm having problems both with the tar.gz download and with CPAN. The error I get is as follows: CPAN.pm: Going to build J/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.61.tar.gz What email address or URL should be used in the suspected-spam report text for users who want more information on your filter insta

[SAtalk] Content Analysis

Hello Fellow SPAMASSASSIN Members... I am new to this list and I have a few questions that would really help out a lot.   1) I have used the Content Checker over at Lyris - Is there such a Content Checker available that I may use on my respective server that allows me to checked my content b

[SAtalk] Re: IMAP only?

On 9 Dec 2003 David Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I was using procmail to run spamassassin, but our mail server has been > changed to run the Cyrus IMAP server (with sieve) on a system where no > one has a login. > > [...] > > In a perfect world, I'd also like to be able to run sa-learn on a r

Re: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

At 12:01 PM 12/9/2003, Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\) wrote: 1) I have used the Content Checker over at Lyris - Is there such a Content Checker available that I may use on my respective server that allows me to checked my content before sending it out via email, etc. I like the tool at Lyris BUT I

[SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation

Hey all, Just an observation with my 2.61 upgrade this morning. Scan times on mails are averaging about 6 seconds, and moving into the 10 second range at times. My average scan time on 2.60 was about 2 seconds, 4 seconds if things were really bogged down. I'm curious if anyone else sees this hap

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

I am looking more of a web-based utility that our staff can use internally where most of our staff does not have access to the server, much less command-line access. As for correcting the items listed in my original post, I am looking for an example of the correct content that should be included i

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

The better question is why? Why would you need to scan your email before sending it? Are you trying to generate a threshold to see how much spam related content can go into an email before SA marks it or are you trying to find a way to get around SA? Gary Smith -Original Message- F

RE: [SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation

Appologies, I've solved my own problem. (I *always* forget to turn DCC back off) Adding score DCC_CHECK 0 to my local.cf right now. :) -Original Message- From: Mark Muller Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] 2.61 scan time observation Hey al

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

The answer to your question, Gary... We are an incentives marketing firm with an affiliate element. Our members can send virtual promotions from their account to friends, family, colleagues, etc; however, some email services such as Hotmail, Yahoo, etc appear to be blocking these promotions. So

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.61 Install Issue

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:54:06AM -0600, Ben Story wrote: > This is on a RH8.0 box. just for kicks, try "unset LANG" or "export LANG=C", then try the Makefile again. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Where's the ladies' sty? I desperately need to powder my snout."

[SAtalk] Postfix - Procmail - SpamAssassin Config

Nevermind all, sorry for the post, I got it working. Thanks, Daniel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything f

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:33 PM -0500 "Thomas Shoaf (PromoStep)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking more of a web-based utility that our staff can use internally > where most of our staff does not have access to the server, much less > command-line access. Which would be useless,

[SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message I am running Debian Linux and have Qmail, VPopMail, and Qmail-Scanner in place.  I have installed 2.61 SA and it runs perfectly from the command line using the spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out test that the INSTALL doc talks about.  I have compiled qmail-scanner wi

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

At 09:55 AM 12/9/2003, you wrote: --On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:33 PM -0500 "Thomas Shoaf (PromoStep)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking more of a web-based utility that our staff can use internally > where most of our staff does not have access to the server, much less > command-line

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

I understand now what you are asking. The fundamental problem still remains the same. If you send an email to system X who thinks it's spam what does it take to make system X think that it's not spam as it really is a valid email. If you are sending emails out like this then they are either 1

Re: [SAtalk] Habeas test

Charles Gregory wrote: There is nothing technically 'magical' about the Habeas headers. They could simply be faked. Habeas Corp says that they make use of copyright laws to pursue legal action against spammers Which they have already done, successfully: http://habeas.com/companyPressPR.html but

[SAtalk] Re: Bug#223399: spamassassin: not_ok_languages, no way to split Chinese

D> I'm confused. There is no need for not_ok_languages, as you can simply D> list all languages but the one you want in ok_languages. Furthermore, D> few people wish to receive mail in every language. Just like white list / black list, you have both because it would be a pain to try to keep track

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

Interesting mail header on this message: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from intrepid.intrepid.com (intrepid.intrepid.com [192.195.190.1]) by screamer.intrepid.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9H4rhE029668 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:04:53 -0800 Rece

Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:32:23 -0500 stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ..snip> > > > Thanks for the helpful reply. > > Do you think my firewall is blocking, even given the traceroute that shows > I can get to one of the servers? I'm behin a NAT'ing OpenBSD firewall if > that matters. > Yes, becaus

[SAtalk] Re: Habeas test

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:18:35 -0800, Kelson Vibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Charles Gregory wrote: > > There is nothing technically 'magical' about the Habeas > > headers. They could simply be faked. Habeas Corp says that they make > > use of copyright laws to pursue legal action against spamm

RE: [SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message /etc/tcp.smtp file : ... 10.10.10.10:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl" ... Add  QS_SPAMASSASSIN="" Also, make sure that spamd runs without the -c option.   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Habeas test

At 02:11 PM 12/9/2003, Scott A Crosby wrote: The plan was abuse copyright and trademark law in order to engage in anticompetetive lock-in. IE, to require payment from people wishing to produce games, people who didn't pay would be forced to commit 'trademark and copyright infringement'. The lock-in

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:12 AM -0500 Charles Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Will RPM's be out soon? Easy enough to make from the tarball: rpmbuild -ta xx.tar.gz This works for any tarball package that includes a specfile.

RE: [SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message Thanks for your help.  I think it's working now.  However, that being said, I changed the qmail-scanner-queue.pl to remove the -c and then modified my tcp.smtp to be this:   127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl":allow,QS_SPAMASSASSIN="",QM

[SAtalk] Re: Habeas test

At 11:11 AM 12/9/2003, Scott A Crosby wrote: The plan was abuse copyright and trademark law in order to engage in anticompetetive lock-in. IE, to require payment from people wishing to produce games, people who didn't pay would be forced to commit 'trademark and copyright infringement'. The lock-in

Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Help with Subject rule

In a post by Jmason back on Sept. 9 2003, try this: header MK_CHARSET_IN_SUBJECT Subject:raw =~ /ISO\-8859/i Change the chrset part to whatever you want, this should allow you access to un-decoded subject. Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. http://www.i-is.com/ 810-794-440

RE: [SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message OK!  I figured it out.  Here's what the tcp.smtp should look like to still catch all the SPAM but also have the system setup with smtp-auth so that everyone no matter what has to authenticate prior to relaying.   127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",QS_SPAMASSASSIN="",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qma

[SAtalk] Sender of email receive a copy of email sent in his/her Inbox!

We are running running SA 2.6 with Postfix. in Mandrake 9.2. This server acts as a spam filter that forwards mail to an actual mail server. Everything works well (filtering, tagging and forwarding) except for one thing - every sender of email to us gets a copy of the email in his/her Inbox.

RE: [SAtalk] Problem with Qmail-Scanner & SA

Title: Message It depends on which networks you want to run SA for.  I currently have it running on all of my networks, like you last example. -Original Message-From: kittonian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:47 PMTo: Vee Persaud; [EMAIL PROTECTED];

[SAtalk] a couple questions.

i want to use the big evil list found here: http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf i asked some friends and they seem to think that by putting this file in my ~/.spamassassin/ directory it will be used automatically. is this true? or is there a source or include command i can

Re: [SAtalk] IMAP only?

Roger, Sorry about that, when I ran it again just now it did remember which messages it has seen. If I'm reading the code right, here some other things I see: - It is written in python ;-). I'm not a perl bigot, but calling spamassassin or spamc from python has got to be slower than using the M

Re: [SAtalk] a couple questions.

At 03:27 PM 12/9/2003, John Harrold wrote: i asked some friends and they seem to think that by putting this file in my ~/.spamassassin/ directory it will be used automatically. is this true? or is there a source or include command i can put in my user_prefs file? That is not true... in ~/.spamassas

Re: [SAtalk] Sender of email receive a copy of email sent in his/her Inbox!

--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:06 PM -0500 Kooi Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are running running SA 2.6 with Postfix. in Mandrake 9.2. This server > acts as a spam filter that forwards mail to an actual mail server. > Everything works well (filtering, tagging and forwarding) except fo

[SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

I'm in need of a decent CGI script, easily implementable by a somewhat rookie web designer.. What I'm looking for is a web site that has a form, someone fills out the form, and it e-mails the contents of the form to a list of e-mail addresses. Essentially, it's for a volunteer fire department, we g

Re: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

Sometime in December Evan Platt assaulted the keyboard and produced: | Any suggestions? have you tried BCC?, it's much more polite than sticking a whole bunch of email addresses in a TO field. -- --

Re: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

At Tue Dec 9 21:04:56 2003, Evan Platt wrote: > > I'm in need of a decent CGI script, easily implementable by a somewhat > rookie web designer.. What I'm looking for is a web site that has a form, > someone fills out the form, and it e-mails the contents of the form to a > list of e-mail addresse

[SAtalk] New to SA

New to SA and unix. I am using SA 2.6 with Guinevere and GW 6. It is helping a lot. I have spent about 3 hours looking through the archives of this list and have not found the answer yeta couple questions: 1. if using the spamassassin --lint at the command prompt and it just goes back to the d

RE: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Evan > Platt > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:05 PM > To: SpamAssassin > Subject: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script? > > > I'm in need of a decent CGI script, easily implementable by a somewhat

Re: [SAtalk] New to SA

At 04:39 PM 12/9/2003, Rachel E. Hewitt wrote: 1. if using the spamassassin --lint at the command prompt and it just goes back to the dos prompt after a moment does that mean that SA is running without any errors? Yes, spamassassin --lint should have no output unless there are errors. If you wan

Re: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

--On Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:32 PM + Martin Radford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Use bcc instead? Did I not mention this CGI I use doesn't support BCC? I guess not.. :) Evan --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorial

[SAtalk] [spamcheck.py] missing file spamd.py

Hi, I'm using spamcheck.py to deliver mails from Postfix to Cyrus-Server via lmtp-socket. An older version works fine, but now it requiers a file named spamd.py. Where can i find that? Who provides the script? Google said nothing about it. spamcheck.py is shipped with the spamassassin-sources,

RE: [SAtalk] OT Help: Mail form CGI script?

W/O BCC the best thing is to recode the CGI script to send individual emails to each recipient rather than sending them all at once. For example, instead of: my $to_everybody = '[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; my $result = &send_mail($from, $to_everybody, $subject, $messa

Re: [SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Mangiafico writes: >> Summary of major changes since 2.60 >> --- >> - updated to reflect new Dynablock DNSBL location > >Does 2.61 also fix the bugs and problems with DYNABLOCK and NJABL hitting >false positives

Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:34:14PM -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:05:42 -0500 > stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:42:28PM -0600, Alex S Moore wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:32:23 -0500 > > > stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > ..snip>

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix - procmail - spamassassin config

Daniel Kaliel wrote: Hey At least once a week our server hangs. I can't figure this out. It seems to be hanging when spamassassin is working on large emails. Here is how I have it setup and where I am confused. My confusion lies in this. If I use the mailbox_command field in postfix do I need

Re: [SAtalk] amavisd-new & spamassassin = no headers. Ugh!

Ryan Moore wrote: Your postfix isn't stripping them right? I use amavisd-new and it works like a charm. I do have $sa_tag_level_deflt set to -999, so it adds headers to every email, but $sa_tag2_level_deflt and $sa_kill_level_deflt are set to 7. I think the default for just $sa_tag is 0, so a

Re: [SAtalk] New to SA

Rachel E. Hewitt wrote: New to SA and unix. I am using SA 2.6 with Guinevere and GW 6. It is helping a lot. I have spent about 3 hours looking through the archives of this list and have not found the answer yeta couple questions: 1. if using the spamassassin --lint at the command prompt and it

HTML Free version (was:Re: [SAtalk] amavisd-new & spamassassin = no headers.)

Ryan Moore wrote: > Your postfix isn't stripping them right? I use amavisd-new and it >works like a charm. I do have $sa_tag_level_deflt set to -999, so it >adds headers to every email, but $sa_tag2_level_deflt and >$sa_kill_level_deflt are set to 7. I think the default for just $sa_tag >is 0,

Re: [SAtalk] Header problems

OK Guys, you are right, just a procmail configuration error... The message was read twice... and the most of the time SA didn't recognize it as SPAM (and it was right :) Tnx Luca Scrive Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 03:18 PM 12/9/03 +0100, Luca Palazzo wrote: > >i'm experiencing a strab

[SAtalk] FW: Can I auto report spam to Razor & DCC using spamassain?

It occurs to me that the world might be a better place if these databases get updated as quickly as possible. Can I instruct Spamassain to do this upon detection, instead of waiting for me to get around to reading my mail and doing it? If so, how. -- "They that would give up essential liberty f

Re: [SAtalk] amavisd-new & spamassassin = no headers. Ugh!

That looks good (I wrote that email from home, so I didn't see the start of the thread with the details, sorry). There is another thing I forgot to mention last night that was also confusing me. We use SQL preferences here, so it might be a little different for you, but we have an entry for the

  1   2   >