I was using spamassassin in my organization and one user did not want to be
included in spam filtering.  The spam box is setup for multiple domains that
are split between 2 machines.  I setup this users email addresses in the
global prefs to have ALL_SPAM_TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I found out the way it does
this is just by initially tagging that users email message as -100 points as
soon as it is scanned and also getting auto-learned as a result because it
is below the minimum ham score. Is there a bug fix for this?  Worked great,
however this user must receive the most Spam out of everyone, offsetting the
overall auto-learning for everyone else.  I had to turn off auto-learning
because it began to learn all of his Spam messages as good mail.  Now my
quandary is I want auto-learning of some type at least just Spam, is there
way to only auto-learn Spam but not auto-learn ham?  I am having a hard time
getting complete cooperation from everyone participating about submitting
their ham/Spam to the public folder I setup in exchange.  I am still getting
pretty good accuracy but I would like to set my bayes score up, I changed
the score from its default because all of the users mail who did not want to
have his mail filtered at the server level was getting learned as good mail
and basically rendering the solution ineffective for most other people in
the organization. 
  

Paul Hirschorn
BraveLine Technology
136 W21 Street 8th Floor
New York, NY 10003

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:    www.braveline.com
voice:  212.376.4000 x311
fax:    212.843.3204




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to