On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 06:34:00PM +0300, Céline REDON wrote:
> yes I have added it today , but it doesnot change anything
> smtps inet n - y - - smtpd -o
> smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o co
> ntent_filter=filter:dummy
>
> filter
I use sendmail+mimedefang+spamassassin for my spam rejections.
Someone else on the list will tell you how to do it using postfix.
Need to use the beta version of postfix.
I also reccomend rejecting at a higher level, and tagging at a lower level.
I started rejecting at 15 and working my way down t
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 07:30:23PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Erick Calder wrote:
> > I'm getting a bunch of mails from MAILER-DAEMONs around the world
> > complaining mostly that [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not exist.
> > these are generated by dictionary spammers who are using my e-mail address
> > fo
Has anyone come up with a solution to this yet?
Regards,
/Jeff
On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 08:02 PM, Dale LaFountain wrote:
On 05.06.2003 16:48 Uhr, Chris Balay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AARGHH! I am in spam hell!
Well when I run spamassassin from the terminal I get the following
error:
raz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I upgraded to RC1 a few minutes ago. First, it wasn't seeing my
previous database. So I blew it away and started clean.
Problem 1: I sent the sample spam through but it didn't
autolearn...I have it set to autolearn above 13.
Problem 2: On the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One other thing that I noticed with RC1 is that the sample spam
packaged with 2.55 and lower is not caught. It dosen't get tagged at
all. I'm wondering if it is timing on one of the RBL test. If so,
does it just pass through without any other test
ok i got this email from my dummy account and i got it on my regular
account replying to see if it makes it
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 20:09, butrus orman wrote:
> NONE of these emails are arriving at my account at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> can someone shed some light
>
> --- Chris Thielen <[EMAIL
At 05:46 PM 8.20.2003 +0100, Yorkshire Dave wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 16:24, Daniel Kaliel wrote:
>> I have been trying to find documentation on how to do this, but have
>> not found any. I spoke with the partnership of my company on this and
>> how it is safer not to, instead filtering email
is there a way to have SA report avg scores of all incoming emails and
and avg socre of those detected as spam?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOT
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 02:09 PM, K Old wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been using SA for at least a year or two now and love it! We
> combine it with MailScanner with ClamAV and out of 20,000 emails per
> week receive no viruses and block out around 4,000 pieces of
> spam.and r
I don't think this made it to the list!
Fred wrote:
> Hello,
> I just wanted to let the group know, 2.6 on Win32 is working great.
> (only 2 small changes needed to get it working.)
> I left directions on the wiki page, www.exit0.us
>
>
> One question, I noticed rules for Yahoo redirects YAHOO_RED
Hi all,
I've installed Spamassassin 2.55 on my RedHat 9 system, but my messages are
not being processed.
I've followed the installation instructions, read all the documentation I
can find, run all the tests I can think of, but still no luck. I'm using
sendmail 8.12.9, Cyrus IMAP and procmail 3.22
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:32 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] New header rule for no FQDN ?
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:19, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan Fullmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:46 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [SAtalk] Rules
> >
> >
> > Is there a good website / url s
At 07:02 AM 8/21/2003 -0700, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
Thanks for the explanation!
Is the auto-learning automatic, or do I need to configure
something in local.cf?
It's on by default. As long as you haven't turned off use_bayes or
auto_learn, it will learn.. (albeit slowly).
anyone know how to enable spamassassin PER domain.
in an easy way. and how can i use spamassassin without using qmail-scanner and
not need to recompile my qmail install with the qmailqueue patch.,
-Thomas
I have created a BAYES token database by running sa-learn as root. It
created the database in /root/.spamassassin . When I run spamd as
root it finds the db but logs constant errors like:
spamd[7021]: cannto write to /root/.spamassassin/bayes_msgcount ,
Bayes db update ignored.
I tried moving it
At 01:11 PM 8/21/2003 +0100, Paul Hutchings wrote:
Excellent! Any idea roughly how long until it's on CPAN?
(speaking as an educated guess and without any real knowledge of what's
going on)
Well, right now it's RC-1, which is a release candidate, also known as "we
think it's done. It is now sta
Sirs, i'm using Spamassassin 2.55-3 and i can't see any bayesian criterias in
headers. I have next variables set in my /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
bayes_path /var/mail/.spamassassin
always_add_report 1
report_safe 0
ok_languages en ru
ls -l /var/mail/.spamassassin:
total 1116
-rw---1 mai
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:49:00AM +0300, landy wrote:
> where do i report ips that send spam
To the connection provider that has control over the IP.
Use the whois tool to determine that. Whois info isn't
always up-to-date (also take a look at abuse.net), reporting
the IP where spam was sent mig
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 07:09:00PM +0300, Daniel Kaliel wrote:
> I am looking for documentation on how to configure Spamassassin
> to delete all messages marked as spam instead of the header
> change. I spoke to the partners in company on the risk of doing
> this, however they have decided to go
> I've gotten a couple interesting spams lately. Well, interesting in
> the sense that I am perplexed by them.
>
> Here's a couple attached. They are from two different domains,
> watchmeandlearn.com and ofcourseitwill.com. They have an opt out
> page, but either it's a mockup, or they just use
Hello all,
Is there a way I can generate a list of domains of senders which are marked as spam by spamassassin
Thanks
Ram
Let me revive an old theme:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:03:31AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:29:46PM +0400, Andrew A. Vasilyev wrote:
> > I get your point of view, but why didn't you put
> > the rule name at the end of former line in parenthesis.
> > And everyo
Hi,
I have a problem with SpamAssassin where it would get (from postfix) an email sent by someone on the internet, and that email already have a X-Spam-Flag: YES and all the other SpamAssassin headers before I do my own SpamAssassin tests.
How can I remove all SpamAssassin headers (that were add
Hello,
This FAQ entry : http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq04.011.htp
says that all_spam_to will try to find the recipient in any of the following headers:
Resent-To # std, rfc822
Resent-Cc # std, rfc822
To
Apparently-To
i have noticed big delays between sending to the list and recieving it?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtu
Hello,
> >I added a section to the main page of the wiki www.exito.us :)
> >One can't repeat this enough, it is NOT a good idea to automatically delete
> >emails marked spam. Then again, it isn't a good idea to date your cousin,
> >but some people never learn!
OK, I'll have to admit I darn
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 03:34, mikea wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 07:30:23PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
me to i think someone has stolen the emails from SA list and used us as
fish baits. i am pist...
for last 3 days got tons of emails as if i send spam or virus to people
--
Hi Stephene,
You could capture the envelope from/to and inject it into the header like
this:
#-
# $@ contains MAIL FROM as well as RCPT TO
# Extract MAIL FROM and dump it from the array with shift.
SENDER = "<$1>"
SHIFT = 1
# Expand the array to extract RCPT TO addresses
I am not sure, but I think that SA will remove SA markups by default.
You could use the following before calling spamc or spamassassin:
:0 w
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| formail -I X-Spam-Status: Yes
However, if you already have an X-Spam-Status: Yes, why not just use it and
save yourself the cycles?
Here it comes again. For those of you who may have a better idea, what rule
would you use to catch this "pic.gif".
Thanks.
Received: (qmail 19778 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2003 12:00:21 -
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 19775 invoked from network
Larry,
I would not want to use it because the tagged spam is not actually on a real spam... It's a false positive as the required_hits was set to 2.0 !!! It would not be tagged as spam by my own installation.
Regards,
Stephane
I am not sure, but I think that SA will remove SA markups by de
Gotcha - thanks for the clarification.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Hutchings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc 1 released
> At 01:11 PM 8/21/2003 +
I just put these in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and spamassassin
doesn't seem to be using them. I haven't customized spamassassin much--
what am I doing wrong?
culley
Justin Mason wrote:
So I'm being driven nuts by AV software which mails "your message contains
a virus" notifications even
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> My new method of stopping the spam . . .
>
>
> Good day sir.
>
> I am writing to inform you that I would like to be removed from every
> bulk email list your products are peddled through.
>
> I am writing to you at this address because, although th
At 09:02 PM 8/20/2003 -0700, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
I posted this but didn't see any replies... Can someone help
me understand it better?
Spamassassin computes the score of the email as if bayes were not involved
and without whitelists. There are thresholds that can be changed in the SA
configu
Yorkshire
Dave wrote a niffty little perl script. Works great. I wrote a little script to
go along with it. It makes the process quicker. I'll make a writeup today and
post it to the wiki and here. It is an incredible time
saver!!!
here is the
link:
http://www.wot.no-ip.com/Projects/Block
> -Original Message-
> From: Amnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Scanning for a file name
>
>
> Here it comes again. For those of you who may have a better
> idea, what rule
> would you use to catch this "
* Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030822 09:33]: wrote:
> OK, this is 2.60 release candidate 1; it should work pretty excellently,
> but we want to give it a day or two before it gets an official thumbs-up.
> Download it from http://SpamAssassin.org/downloads.html .
When I run
i am not seeing messages i've posted to the list today, and reading at
the archieves i saw the respnse you posted for me simon...
is there a delay on the list
i also saw from my procmail that SA marked as spam a msg from SA labeld
"I've got a couple more I want to go after" but i did not see it
Hi,
The tech support team who look ofter my dedicated machine have just
installed SpamAssassin and Clam AV, which seems to be working extremely
well. There's just one thing that has me a bit stumped...
According to the SpamAssassin docs any mail tagged as spam should have
the subject rewritten
Hi Ben (and list people),
I've been having a strange issue with SpamAssassin (both 1.55 and 1.60)
on OSX Server.
Everything seems to compile and install properly. I start spamd with:
/usr/bin/spamd -d -r /var/run/spamd.pid -a -u spam -x -H /var/spam
(user spam is set to home directory /var/spam)
Hi all-
We have a setup with qmail+vpopmail+procmail+SA. We are calling spamc from
.qmail's globally for each domain and using the global local.cf file for
prefs. For our 20 or so local users (/etc/passwd not vpopmail) we use a
.spamassassin dir for user_prefs and they can control their own.
Our spam has been relatively light over the past few
days. The spammers must be busy dealing
with the onslaught of meaningless unwanted emails from sobig.f. H.
I wonder what that feels like??? A bit of poetic justice when I look at it in that light.
anyone know how to enable spamassassin PER domain.
in an easy way. and how can i use spamassassin without using qmail-scanner and
not need to recompile my qmail install with the qmailqueue patch.,
-Thomas
Hello all,
Is there a way I can generate a list of domains of senders which are marked as spam by spamassassin
Thanks
Ram
Hello,
I just wanted to let the group know, 2.6 on Win32 is working great. (only 2
small changes needed to get it working.)
I left directions on the wiki page, www.exit0.us
One question, I noticed rules for Yahoo redirects YAHOO_REDIR and also
BIZ_TLD in 2.6 but I have an e-mail which is not scor
I’m encountering make problems with both the perl Makefile.PL and the CPAN shell installation
approaches.
CPAN shell tells me that it cannot find pod2man in my path
even though it’s in /usr/bin and runs when I
type pod2man to my shell. I’ve installed all of the other modules listed
in
I have some rejects in my maillog. Was sourceforge having problems or ???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ host 66.35.250.206
206.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 206.0/24.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa.
206.0/24.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer lists.sourceforge.net.
grep -i Aug 21 /var/log/ma
What version of SA are you using?
I noticed this issue yesterday with RC1 of 2.6, I sent a message to the
list, no response yet.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
culley harrelson wrote:
> I just put these in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and spamassassin
> doesn't seem
landy wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 03:34, mikea wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 07:30:23PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
me to i think someone has stolen the emails from SA list and used us as
fish baits. i am pist...
for last 3 days got tons of emails as if i send spam or virus to people
Sobig.F
Hi,
Thomas Skaret Larsen wrote:
anyone know how to enable spamassassin PER domain. in an easy way. and
how can i use spamassassin without using qmail-scanner and not need to
recompile my qmail install with the qmailqueue patch.,
Add the followng to the .qmail-default file if you are using vpopm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with SpamAssassin where it would get (from postfix) an
email sent by someone on the internet, and that email already have a
X-Spam-Flag: YES and all the other SpamAssassin headers before I do my
own SpamAssassin tests.
How can I remove all SpamAssa
Hi there,
which config do I have to use: local.cf or user_prefs ?
In /etc/mail/spamassassin there is a local.cf - and in
/home/mail/.spamassassin/ there is an user_prefs.
Are both needed for spamassassin running as daemon (spamd/spamc) ?
--
Regards,
Jens Strohschnitter
--
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:40:00PM +0300, landy wrote:
> is there a way to have SA report avg scores of all incoming emails and
> and avg socre of those detected as spam?
If you run spamd on the system, you can see it adds log entries if
configured properly. You can parse the logs for those entri
SpamAssassin-2.53. Guess I should upgrade...
On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 07:19 AM, Fred wrote:
What version of SA are you using?
I noticed this issue yesterday with RC1 of 2.6, I sent a message to the
list, no response yet.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
culley harr
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:07:33PM -0700, Robert E. Shelton wrote:
> CPAN shell tells me that it cannot find pod2man in my path even though
> it's in /usr/bin and runs when I type pod2man to my shell. I've
> installed all of the other modules listed in INSTALL hoping to fix the
> problem, and reloa
Greetings All,
Having escaped a problem with spam until this week (thanks Sobig!!!), we haven't
had a need to filter email. Nonetheless, that has now changed. Currently I have a
quick and dirty perl filter running but it is just cutting on subject lines. Because
the subject lines hit a li
I have not tried that install myself. I have heard of others on the list
have good success. I use RH so I use Theo's RPMs.
--Larry
>-Original Message-
>From: Jennifer Fountain
>I found these installaions and installed spamassassin via these:
>
>#ssh into raq
>su -
>mkdir /tmp/spama
I'm running 2.55 and rules from
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules are not working
either. In fact I can't catch any mail re: Wicked scrensaver, thank
you...
Body rules seem to be working, but not header rules???
>>> "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/22/2003 10:19:01 AM >>>
What versio
> Has anyone come up with a solution to this yet?
>
> Regards,
> /Jeff
If you search the archives I think you'll find the answer, as I'm sure
it's been discussed and solved some months ago.
I can't remember for sure, but off the top of my head, I think its caused
by a version mismatch, either by
Hello,
I'd like to add spamassassin rules to match certain attachment
filenames, but I can't seem to get it right. I'm trying things like:
rawbody SOBIG_VIRUS
/filename="?application.pif|document_all.pif|thank_you.pif"?/
Any ideas on how to match attachment filenames?
Patrick
-
At 8/21/03 05:14 PM , Jennifer Fountain wrote:
http://sylvestre.ledru.info/howto/howto_qmail_spamassassin.php
http://www.magma.com.ni/~jorge/spamassassin.html
Does anyone have any pointers or recommend which doc I should follow?
Those two both seem to involve setting up SA filtering site-wide, whi
Hi all,
Would anyone use SPAMPD ?
And if so, once SA is installed , I donot understand how to start SPAMPD.
It is said on "http://www.worlddesign.com/Content/rd/mta/spampd/spampd.html";
that SPAMPD REPLACES SPAMD but what does it mean?
Thanx for help...
CR
-
Ok, I grabbed the script I wrote. Quick and dirty but seems to save a LOT of
time. The idea is simple.
Basically grep your spamtrap for all lines that have 'http://' in them. You
lose a small percent because of line breaks but they repeat so much it
doesn't matter.
Next you just strip away all th
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 20:42, Carl R. Friend wrote:
>Hello,
>
> > >I added a section to the main page of the wiki www.exito.us :)
> > >One can't repeat this enough, it is NOT a good idea to automatically delete
> > >emails marked spam. Then again, it isn't a good idea to date your cousin,
> > >
At 09:20 AM 8/22/2003 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
have some rejects in my maillog. Was sourceforge having problems or ???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ host 66.35.250.206
206.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 206.0/24.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa.
206.0/24.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer list
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Send Spamassassin-talk mailing list submissions to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'he
Sorry about accidental send of last
Anyway
1. Sys:Syslog warning when doing perl makefile.pl. Remember Win32
doesn't use SpamD [nor does Sys::Syslog exist for Win32], hence this
warning shouldn't appear.
2 At very end of running spamassassin -D < sample-spam.txt output
debug: RBL: success for 3
Hi
i have sent one email asking for - that i am unable to connect mysql databasefrom my server. The database is under a different host but is *spamassassin* istrying to connect only the database at the local server?
Here is again i am giving the snapshot of the log file for first few lines..
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:41:40AM -0500, Patrick Bores is rumored to have said:
>
> I'd like to add spamassassin rules to match certain attachment
> filenames, but I can't seem to get it right. I'm trying things like:
>
> rawbody SOBIG_VIRUS
> /filename="?application.pif|document_all.pif|t
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Radford
>I'd suggest that you get them to put this in writing, explicitly
>acknowledging that there is a risk of non-spam being tagged as spam
>and being deleted inadvertently. (Perhaps someone could suggest
>suitable wording to go in a FAQ item :-) Wi
"Carl R. Friend" wrote:
>I'll concur that auto-deletion is not the wisest path to follow
> but I, too, am being lead down that path at the ISP
*wibble* Is this a Management path, or a "Users flooding the support
lines with requests" path?
> I volunteer time
> to (non-profit, so don't get you
Hi,
I've run sa-learn over 300 spam emails (quite few, I know) und much more
ham emails.
ls -al .spamassassin/ looks good:
insgesamt 3772
drwx--4096 2003-08-22 19:39 .
drwxr-xr-x8192 2003-08-22 19:31 ..
-rw---2016 2003-08-22 19:39 bayes_msgcount
-rw--- 667648 2003-08-22 1
I'm trying to create a script that periodically emails a report to a user with the
sender and subjects of the emails that got flagged as spam. The snippet below is from
my spamlog. Does anyone know how to extract just the "From: somesender <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>" and "Subject: details of transact
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Erick Calder wrote:
> > I'm getting a bunch of mails from MAILER-DAEMONs around the world
> > complaining mostly that [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not exist.
> > these are generated by dictionary spammers who are using my e-mail address
> > for the reply-to hea
On 08/21/03 09:15 AM, Louis LeBlanc sat at the `puter and typed:
> I've gotten a couple interesting spams lately. Well, interesting in
> the sense that I am perplexed by them.
>
> Here's a couple attached. They are from two different domains,
> watchmeandlearn.com and ofcourseitwill.com. They h
Sorry folk, this is a continuing saga. I can't email Yorkshire Dave
directly.
YD:
This is the latest trace that I have when attpempting to get to your
site.
< internal subnets deleted>
3 64.83.78.1 (64.83.78.1) 4.255 ms 3.697 ms 3.650 ms
4 64.83.72.1.PHI-7507.cavtel.net (64.83.72.1) 9
While we have discussed catching random letters, I wanted to go over a
finding. If you use my OBFU rules, or change Fred's to rawbody, there is one
instance of FPs you can watch out for. (Both sets found on the wiki
http://www.exit0.us)
Emails written in Word will tend to hit these rawbody rules d
At 8/22/03 11:06 AM , Kris Deugau wrote:
I've seen legit mail on the default SA rules score 12-15.
Personally, I've never seen a legitimate mail score over about 4.5, and
those were from a couple of folks I know who overuse HTML in their emails.
The vast bulk of my ham scores below -5.0. I auto-
Michael Bell writes:
> Sorry about accidental send of last
>
> Anyway
>
> 1. Sys:Syslog warning when doing perl makefile.pl. Remember Win32
> doesn't use SpamD [nor does Sys::Syslog exist for Win32], hence this
> warning shouldn't appear.
>
> 2 At very end of running spamassassin -D < sample-sp
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87682
Dave
>
> I'm encountering make problems with both the perl Makefile.PL and
> the CPAN shell installation approaches.
>
> CPAN shell tells me that it cannot find pod2man in my path even
> though it's in /usr/bin and runs when I type po
Well I have a bunch I'm testing out. Some great ones here. Working very
nice, so I figure I would share them out. Keep in mind that some of these
WORKSTATION rules are for observation purposes. I'm well aware some of the
headers could be legit.
I will score these small as usual so they just say,
> You can create the configuration directory with automatically generated user
> ID / password by using 'razor-admin -create' under the same user ID that you
> also use for 'spamassassin -r'.
thanks
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 19:47, AltGrendel wrote:
> Sorry folk, this is a continuing saga. I can't email Yorkshire Dave
> directly.
>
> YD:
>
> This is the latest trace that I have when attpempting to get to your
> site.
>
>
You're getting all the way except the last hop, me.
Heading back in the
I seen this too, but make sure you run --lint on your config file to ensure
it's good!
See also:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/Win32Install26
It does not appear that all tests are working on my install of 2.6, --lint
returns as normal but
as in my other post, I am seeing misses where I know there
*BIG SNIP*
>
> header MY_HEADER_TAG6 List-Unsubscribe =~ /^\ describe MY_HEADER_TAG6 Possible spam tag in list unsub, Mailto:
> score MY_HEADER_TAG6 0.01
>
opps sorry, this was typoed by my big fingers:
header MY_HEADER_TAG6 List-Unsubscribe =~ /^\/i
Ah that's better :-)
--Chris Sante
I feed my SA box
about twice a week with untagged spam that I collect. I ha dit forget
everything for the past few weeks today, and then ran sa-learn on all the
messages.
Learned from 407 in
25 seconds. Is that slower or faster than what people in here
expect?
Just wanting to get
an
Anyone have the URL to sign up with the SAProxy mailing list? This program
is driving me nuts. Runs like a champ, then just stops.
--
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run m
Martin,
Look for a file called check_bayes_db in the tools directory of
Mail-SpamAssassin.
Run it and pipe into head.
./check_bayes_db |head
Look for the number of nspam and nham. Both numbers must be over 200
for bayes to work. See below.
Jimmy
0.000000 non-token d
TopPost: Correction to my list below. "spamd" should be "spamass-milter"
for the threshold blocking. Sorry.
>Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:32:21 -0500
>To: Abigail Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Daniel
Kaliel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "Jack L. Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Deleti
> I personally have been putting in private procmail rules to scrape
> them off into a virus bounce folder. But there are a lot of different
> patterns out there and I am only partially affective.
yes, I did also find an SA rule that will at least make sure the bounce was
sent in response to a me
yes I have added it today , but it doesnot change anything
here is exactly what I have
# ==
# service type private unpriv chroot wakeup maxproc command + args
# (yes) (yes) (yes) (never) (50)
# ==
This has happened a few times: when a message is retrieved from the
upstream POP server with a large attachment (100K), my local copy of SA
takes 50 seconds or so to process it. I am using Procmail to filter
deliver the messages locally -- not passing them on to another MDA.
During the 50-second p
Hello,
I am new to SA and would like to know if catching 160 spam from 8000 mails
in a day is normal or not? I suspect this is not normal so any ideas where i
should look to tighten things up? I am using SA in conjunction with
Mailscanner
Thanks
Darren
--
This message has been scanned for viru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Loiterman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I upgraded to RC1 a few minutes ago. First, it wasn't seeing my
> previous database. So I blew it away and started clean.
>
> Problem 1: I sent the sample spam through b
hello
i've made a cursory look around and read the FAQ files and i don't see any
mention of how to change the message sent in the bounce messages for spam that
reaches the set limit of points. i'd like to put something a little more
explanatory than "Congratulations!". thanks.
jason
-
Hi spamassassin-talk,
This is a bit tricky to explain so here I go..
I am using spamassassing through postfix by using the following entry
in master.cf
smtp inetn - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=filter:
filterunix - n n - -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>> One other thing that I noticed with RC1 is that the sample spam
>> packaged with 2.55 and lower is not caught. It dosen't get tagged
>> at all. I'm wondering if it is timing on one of the RBL test. If
>> so, does it just pass through without an
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
