-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> One other thing that I noticed with RC1 is that the sample spam >> packaged with 2.55 and lower is not caught. It dosen't get tagged >> at all. I'm wondering if it is timing on one of the RBL test. If >> so, does it just pass through without any other tests? > > I checked my mail this morning and there were about twenty spam > messages that were not even looked at by SA. The SA headers were > not included. This was a false negative, it simply wasn't even > considered by SA. There were, however, many messages that were > tagged correctly. It appears that something is timing out and > causing SA to not even scan certain messages. > > For the time beaing I went back to 2.55 and all is fine, but I > would like to upgrade to 2.6.
- ------------------------------ Mike Loiterman grantADLER Tel: 630-302-4944 Fax: 773-868-0071 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key 0xD1B9D18E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.2 Comment: This message has been digitally signed by Mike Loiterman iQA/AwUBP0Z+cGjZbUnRudGOEQLTpwCfXnAapQv2P73ERaFlvlXEZhRXh0UAoMbC 3W9dthPVY6yBjlWgXI+T0g+X =9Vpn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk