-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> One other thing that I noticed with RC1 is that the sample spam
>> packaged with 2.55 and lower is not caught.  It dosen't get tagged
>> at all.  I'm wondering if it is timing on one of the RBL test.  If
>> so, does it just pass through without any other tests?
> 
> I checked my mail this morning and there were about twenty spam
> messages that were not even looked at by SA.  The SA headers were
> not included.  This was a false negative, it simply wasn't even
> considered by SA.  There were, however, many messages that were
> tagged correctly.  It appears that something is timing out and
> causing SA to not even scan certain messages.
> 
> For the time beaing I went back to 2.55 and all is fine, but I
> would like to upgrade to 2.6.


- ------------------------------
Mike Loiterman
grantADLER
Tel: 630-302-4944
Fax: 773-868-0071
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key 0xD1B9D18E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2
Comment: This message has been digitally signed by Mike Loiterman

iQA/AwUBP0Z+cGjZbUnRudGOEQLTpwCfXnAapQv2P73ERaFlvlXEZhRXh0UAoMbC
3W9dthPVY6yBjlWgXI+T0g+X
=9Vpn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to