Hi everyone
I am having some trouble getting Spamassassin to install on our Sendmail
Server (HPUX 10:20)
I've installed Perl and all the necessary components, then tried installing
Spamassassin - this then asks for other components - which are now
installed.
Spamassassin will now run the Makefi
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 06:51, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Thanks. :) As an FYI, I've had some RPMs available since 2.31's release
> (mentioned on the SA-talk list as well):
> with SRPM available at:
> http://www.kluge.net/ftp/pub/felicity/SRPMS/spamassassin-2.31-1.src.rpm
Can you add a Requires:
Hi all --
If anyone's been checking taint.org, they might have noticed that I'm back
in contact -- although I'm taking my sweet time to get my mail setup
working decently again ;)
Anyway, some quick notes on SpamAssassin dev based on a skim of recent
traffic:
- regarding lists and 'my address'
FROM_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL was already implemented as FROM_NAME_EQ_FROM_ADDR ;)
Does it make sense to keep the older one and delete FROM_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL?
--j.
--
'Justin Mason' => { url => 'http://jmason.org/', blog => 'http://taint.org/' }
---
Th
Justin Mason wrote:
> FROM_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL was already implemented as FROM_NAME_EQ_FROM_ADDR ;)
> Does it make sense to keep the older one and delete FROM_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL?
Are they scored the same? Be really odd if they weren't...
Besides, this should be on sa-dev too ;-)
Matt.
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:20:31AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Can you add a Requires: for package perl-Time-HiRes? (This is available
> in RH7.3 and Rawhide, but for earlier RH it's in Power Tools.). I just
It should actually be a Requires for perl(Time::HiRes) since some people
may have a di
[redirected to SAtalk per Dan's suggestion]
Mark Perkel writes:
> Yes - but because a subject isn't generally discussed among most people
> doesn't meen that it's isn't important as a subject to many people. And
> I think that Spam Assassin should never become (inadvertantly) a
> censorship tool.
Justin,
I've been trying to get some help setting up SA on a windows server. I was
finally able to get it integrated and working. But it messed up our incoming
mail. Some how an extra linefeed was feed into the email begining with the
first line. The result was that all mail readers interpret th
Clearly, getting a spammer's connection terminated isn't enough of a
deterrent to keep them from spamming. Perhaps getting the spammers
themselves terminated would be...
...anyone got a good sniper rifle? ;)
---
This sf.net email is sponsore
"Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [redirected to SAtalk per Dan's suggestion]
>
> Mark Perkel writes:
>> Yes - but because a subject isn't generally discussed among most people
>> doesn't meen that it's isn't important as a subject to many people. And I
>> think that Spam Assassin s
There are some interesting ideas for clogging spam mailing lists at
http://www.turnstep.com/Spambot/. I added a short php script to do our
part at http://www.dovesystems.com/BuildPage.php?page=contact . Maybe
someday they'll advertise 100,000,000 email addresses, two or three of
which are guarante
Kevin Gagel said:
> The -F0 seemed to be needed for my MTA, I also tried -F 0, I'm not sure which is
> correct but both seem to cause the reordering of FROM: to the first line.
> I can't think of anything else that could be helpful. I'm confident that the
> problem lies with SA because it uses m
There
is a line in there "Must be 18 yrs. old" which probably triggered
it.
-Original Message-From: Marsha Hanchrow
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002
10:41 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] Porn? Am I
so unimaginative?I
never did manage
This is what matched:
Must be full-time student and at least 18
^^^ ^^^
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| Marsha Hanchrow
| Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:41 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subjec
Hi,
I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level -
- change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to
``text/plain''. And I have read rfc1521 which describes the different
content types: text, multipart, application, ... What I am trying to
find out is what are the consequ
At 07/03/2002 03:51, Brandon L. Griffith wrote:
>whitelist_from "[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>But still, it filters her emails out. Did I misread something somewhere
>or might there be another issue at hand here?
Quotes aren't needed (and probably aren't valid), and spaces are used t
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:42:30PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote:
> I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level -
>- change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to
> ``text/plain''. And I have read rfc1521 which describes the different
> content types: text, multipart, appli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Pete O'Hara on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:42:30PM -0400:
> I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level - -
> change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to ``text/plain''.
> And I have read rfc1521 which describes the differe
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Helen Best said:
> Spamassassin will now run the Makefile, the Make and the Make install but
> fails with the Make test.
>
> Can anyone help me with the problems please
Sure, if you say what the symptoms are.
Providing the output from the `make test' is vastly more useful t
Hi list,
I'm an admin for a medium sized free webmail (~150k users) and just got
a mail like this:
**
Hello Administrators for [mywebmail.tld] [lots of spaces],
Please check to verify that messages being sent to our Opt-in customers
that are using your services are not being blocked by any of
I am modifying spamd so that preferences are loaded depending upon the
email address of the message recipient. That way, I can store user_prefs
for non-local users.
For single-recipient messages, I have no problem finding the to address:
Received: from localhost (jdrew@localhost) by origin.com
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Jure Pecar wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm an admin for a medium sized free webmail (~150k users) and just got
> a mail like this:
> Does anybody know something about them? I'm not blocking them directly,
> i'm only using ordb.org and relays.osirusoft.com lookups.
>
> All those s
I just installed SpamAssassin last night (personal use). So far it caught about 20 emails, but a couple slipped by due to an error which I cannot track down.
Subject: *SPAM* Deca, D-BOL, Winni-V ! Get Big, Ripped & Strong!
Folder: IN.caughtspam
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:02:54PM +0200, Jure Pecar wrote:
| Please check to verify that messages being sent to our Opt-in customers
| that are using your services are not being blocked by any of
Why in the world would you (the message originator) have a reason to
think that everyone is blockin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said evil 853 on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:11:06PM -0700:
> I just installed SpamAssassin last night (personal use). So far it
> caught about 20 emails, but a couple slipped by due to an error which
> I cannot track down. Subject: *SPAM* Deca
I am trying to set up SpamAssassin to filter incoming mail at a
medium-sized site (less than 200 users). We will not be moving from
our current final MTA/POP/IMAP product, so SpamAssassin will be
running on a relay between the outside and the final MTA. I have set
up Sendmail as the relay, and usi
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> | email marketing and communication solutions
>
> A marketing company has concerns about blacklists. Any reasons why
> they should be concerned? If they're legit, why should they be
> concerned?
We've already had a discussion about how rabid
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:44:12PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
| Said evil 853 on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:11:06PM -0700:
|
| > I just installed SpamAssassin last night (personal use). So far it
| > 3783procmail: Program failure (-13) of
| I could be way off base here, but I seem to recall r
I'm using spamass-milter on my mail gateway, and I would like to figure
out a way to not make SA modify the body, only change the subject, when
mail has been marked as spam. I would also like to figure out a way to
make all high-scoring spam (15+) get deleted automatically. Is this
possible usi
Hello all!
I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
--
--
Hans Vallden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Olivier:
I had been using the standard call in .procmailrc:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/home/rcs/mail/spam
With this, I only get the error message for root:
Jul 3 17:27:38 firefox spamd[28173]: read_scoreonly_config: cannot open
"/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs": Perm
Hans Vallden wrote:
> I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to
> Mac OS X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so.
> Heck, I might even pay some money for specific instructions.
http://rhumba.pair.com/ben/docs/sa.html
Shall I presume the check is in the
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Hans Vallden write:
> I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to Mac OS
> X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so. Heck, I might
> even pay some money for specific instructions.
I'd be surprised if this wasn't enough
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 07:18, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 03:20:31AM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > Can you add a Requires: for package perl-Time-HiRes? (This is available
> > in RH7.3 and Rawhide, but for earlier RH it's in Power Tools.). I just
>
> It should actually be a
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 09:31, Rich Wellner wrote:
> Censorship is not the exclusive domain of the government. A school, for
> example, could easily use SA as a censorship tool.
If it's a private school, you're paying for them to filter for you. Not
censorship. If it's a government school, then i
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Tony L. Svanstrom write:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 the voices made Hans Vallden write:
>
> > I wonder if anyone has made any attempts to install Spamassassin to Mac OS
> > X/Mac OS X Server? I would be VERY interested in doing so. Heck, I might
> > even pay some mon
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:44:11PM -0700, Bob Sully wrote:
| I had been using the standard call in .procmailrc:
|
| :0fw
| | spamassassin -P
|
| :0:
| * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| /home/rcs/mail/spam
|
| With this, I only get the error message for root:
|
| Jul 3 17:27:38 firefox spamd[28173]: r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We're running SA on a couple of boxes to spam filter mail.
MIMEDefang is used as the filtering agent, which bounces
messages above 7 points. As these machines are gateways for
incoming mail only, would it be a good idea to blacklist our
domains? I
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:48:09PM -0500, Bill Omer wrote:
| I'm using spamass-milter on my mail gateway, and I would like to figure
| out a way to not make SA modify the body, only change the subject, when
| mail has been marked as spam.
report_header 1
(hmm, is there no switch to turn of
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 05:44:11PM -0700, Bob Sully wrote:
>
> | I had been using the standard call in .procmailrc:
> |
> | :0fw
> | | spamassassin -P
> |
> | :0:
> | * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> | /home/rcs/mail/spam
> |
> | With this, I only ge
>Jul 3 17:27:44 firefox spamd[28177]: read_scoreonly_config: cannot open
>"/home/rcs/.spamassassin/user_prefs": Permission denied
Are you sure /home/rcs/.spamassassin/user_prefs exists?
If not, maybe you're missing the -x (or is that -a) option to spamc
that tells to create the user-pref.
Oli
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:31:31PM -0700, Bob Sully wrote:
| Right, it's started via /etc/rc.d/rc.local:
|
| /usr/bin/spamd -u nobody
Ahh, there's your problem (I think).
(man spamd)
-u username, --username=username
Run as the named user. The alternative, default
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:18:41PM -0500, Richie Laager wrote:
| We're running SA on a couple of boxes to spam filter mail.
| MIMEDefang is used as the filtering agent, which bounces
| messages above 7 points. As these machines are gateways for
| incoming mail only, would it be a good idea to
I run a consignment shop, so the emails I sent out to our vendors
get false positive by my own SA when people hit "REPLY".
Has anyone found a solution for this?
Do your put your own custom headers in the outgoing mail, then
use a filter to look for that header in the reply?
Any tips appreciated
> "RL" == Richie Laager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RL> incoming mail only, would it be a good idea to blacklist our
RL> domains? I'm thinking that nobody should be sending messages
RL> with a from address that is within our domains. I did some
RL> checking, and only spammy-looking domains
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 22:01 pm, Derrick 'dman' Hudson
wrote:
> On the surface it sounds like a good idea, but when you get
> a bit deeper it isn't really practical. Maybe a
> not-too-high scoring rule for those messages would be
> acceptable, bu
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:05:24PM -0700, Derek at CD Baby wrote:
| I run a consignment shop, so the emails I sent out to our vendors
| get false positive by my own SA when people hit "REPLY".
Why? Which rules are triggered?
| Has anyone found a solution for this?
First the cause of the taggi
Damn. Ok. Thanks for the help. I thought mail clients return all incoming headers. Oh
well.
I'll just tweak the rule scores then to downplay the ones getting matched.
Thanks D-Man for saving me some time.:-)
> | Do your put your own custom headers in the outgoing mail, then
> | use a fil
After installing version 2.31, it now takes 15-30 seconds per message to run
through spam assassin. Anyone else having or had a similar problem to this?
Kris Stumpner
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Caffeinated soap. No kiddi
49 matches
Mail list logo
