"Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [redirected to SAtalk per Dan's suggestion] > > Mark Perkel writes:
>> Yes - but because a subject isn't generally discussed among most people >> doesn't meen that it's isn't important as a subject to many people. And I >> think that Spam Assassin should never become (inadvertantly) a censorship >> tool. > > Nothing becomes a censorship tool unless a government is involved and forces > people to use it. Censorship is not the exclusive domain of the government. A school, for example, could easily use SA as a censorship tool. The more cogent point is that SA is a tool. It's not a censor. A person can choose to use SA as a tool of censorship, but that same person can also employ a magic marker to a copy of Huck Finn and achieve the same result. IOW, I wouldn't worry too much about SA. I'd worry about the people. Ha, I just noticed that Mark Perkel said that. It's a small world. Usually I agree with that cat, but this time he's wrong. Censorship is not a government thing, it's just particularly troublesome when the government is doing it. rw2 http://spamassassin.net is now taking beta subscribers Spam free webmail for the masses ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek No, I will not fix your computer. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
