-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Said Pete O'Hara on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:42:30PM -0400:
> I understand what defang_mime is doing at the surface level - -
> change the Content-type: header of suspected spam to ``text/plain''.
> And I have read rfc1521 which describes the different content types:
> text, multipart, application, ... What I am trying to find out is what
> are the consequences of changing Content-type from "application" to
> "text/plain". What effects does this have on the data that is being
> sent as "application"? Does it harm it in someway so as to make it
> useless to the recipient given the attachment is something the end
> user needs to use?
Along the same lines -- out of curiousity, does spamassassin -d change
the Content-type back?
- --
[!] Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Encrypted email preferred (key 0xC9C40C31)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE9I1Gv94d6K8nEDDERAom8AJ4iOV8dhprEGM5art+jOrfDU08Y0gCbB1Ek
cGdjaEVd6X2eFzeyvLnystk=
=T8X1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
No, I will not fix your computer.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
