On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 14:41, David Logan wrote:
> Thanks guys..
> Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread
> the mimedefang file - now seems to work !!
> Cheers.
> > Example:
> > header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
> > describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mention
Thanks guys..
Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread
the mimedefang file - now seems to work !!
Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 January 2004 14:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom
Are you sure you want that rule to be case sensitive, lower-case only?
try
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/i
(note the added i at the end)
At 11:48 AM 1/20/04 +, David Logan wrote:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
scor
I am having some trouble with Subject header rules to my local.cf file -
they don't seem to be getting read by spamassassin.
Example:
header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/
describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin
score SUBJECT_VICODIN 4.0
(I took this example from Chris' site http:
cami
Sent: Sun 1/4/2004 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [SAtalk] custom filter rules
Hi All..
Does anyone know of any other rulesets besides these?
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigev
Hi All..
Does anyone know of any other rulesets besides these?
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf
http://www.emtinc.net/includes/popcorn.cf
http://www.emtinc.net/includes/backhair.cf
http://www.emtinc.net/includes/weeds.cf
http://www.emtinc.net/includes/chickenpox.cf
Rega
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
> Just a minor correction,
>
> try this:
>
> header__BLOCKTOFFICEOUTTo =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> header__BLOCKFOFFICEOUTFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> metaBLOCK_MY_OFFICE(__BLOCKTOFFICEOUT && !__BLOCKFOFFICEOUT)
> describeBLOCK
Just a minor correction,
try this:
header__BLOCKTOFFICEOUTTo =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
header__BLOCKFOFFICEOUTFrom =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
metaBLOCK_MY_OFFICE(__BLOCKTOFFICEOUT && !__BLOCKFOFFICEOUT)
describeBLOCK_MY_OFFICENo E-mail to alias from outside
scoreBLO
hi i am trying to setup a rule so that we wont get mail to our local
alias from an outside address, this is what i wrote but it doesnt seem
to work as i thought it would, can u give any advice
header BLOCKTTOFFICEOUT To = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
header BLOCKTTOFFICEOUT From != [EMAIL P
One more for the gang, if you will permit..
I'd like to add a negative point to any email coming in that contains my
company name, but.. and it's a big butt, I don't want it to apply the
negative point if the reference to the company name is in email format..
For example.. say.. my company name i
I created my own rbl zone and configured SA to check it in my
user_prefs. When I do a lookup for 7.69.106.200.rbl.rbinc.com, it is
listed but SA isn't tagging it as spam. I am not sure where the problem
lays - the zone or the user_prefs?
Here are the files:
#Custom RBL
header RCVD_IN_RBLRBINC_C
At 07:50 AM 10/21/2003, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
SA will by default parse *.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin. Thus, you can put
them in a separate CF file
Thomas Kinghorn Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 7:50 AM
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> file OR can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
They can be in any .cf file within the /etc/mail/spamassassin folder.
cheers,
Colin
Co
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Kinghorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules >> local.cf
>
>
> Hi List.
>
> Just a quick question.
>
> D
Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
Hi List.
Just a quick question.
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
Either will probably work, but it depends a bit on how you call
SpamAssassin. Generally
Yes.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Kinghorn
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:50 AM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules
Yes, any *.cf file in that directory will be parsed for rules / config
options.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> Just a quick question.
>
> Do all custom rules have to be added to the
> /etc/mail/spamassassin/lo
Hi List.
Just a quick question.
Do all custom rules have to be added to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file OR
can a seperate .cf file be placed in the spamassassin directory?
This is for a system wide installation.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Tom Kinghorn
---
Thanks Chris!
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 10:59 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'
> Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - HTML and Line Breaks
&g
t;A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy
Wonka
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - HTML and Line Breaks
&g
At 10:48 AM 10/8/03 -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
So, I have to use a reverse not a forward zone? Here is what I have
currently:
Well, it's a forward zone.. note that the records returned are A records,
not PTR.. However, the queries are built in a reverse-dns style, kind of
like how "in-addr.
Hi All,
I have been successfully using the rule that tests for content after the
ending HTML tag. One problem I don't quite understand how to fix is if the
content is not on the same line as the tag but after a line break. If I
understand correctly, rawbody will not work with line breaks but bod
via host identified via rbl.rbinc.com
tflags RVCD_LOC_RBL NET
score RVCD_LOC_RBL 6.00
Does this look correct?
Jenn
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:07 AM
To: Jennifer Fountain; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Custom
At 10:37 AM 10/7/03 -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
I am creating my own RBL (http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs) and
need guidance on creating the actual db. Does anyone have a sample rbl
db they can send me or direct me to a url?
RBLs are served as DNS zones and not as ordinary databases..
www.blackholes.us has ISC-BIND format zone files you can download.
FP
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:37, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
> I am creating my own RBL (http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs) and
> need guidance on creating the actual db. Does anyone have a sample rbl
> db they can send me or
I am creating my own RBL (http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs) and
need guidance on creating the actual db. Does anyone have a sample rbl
db they can send me or direct me to a url?
Thank you in advance
Jennifer Fountain
---
This sf.
I'm getting pummeled with a few dozen copies of the latest MS
worm/trojan every hour so I figured I'd try to get SA to flag them, but
unfortunately I'm not having very much luck. I've been trying to add
some custom rules to my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf but they never
seem to match. Here are
Fred wrote:
>> See this page:
>> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
Frank Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sweet. Exactly what I needed. Thanks.
You can also read Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf (look for the string
"check_rbl") and read the examples in the 20_dnsbl_tests.cf file that
ship
Sweet. Exactly what I needed. Thanks.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
> See this page:
> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
>
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
See this page:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/CustomRBLs
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
Frank Pineau wrote:
> Is there any way to make SA check other RBL's? Ever since the demise
> of Osirusoft, I've been using my own RBL zone file on my DNS server,
> but I'd like to
Is there any way to make SA check other RBL's? Ever since the demise of
Osirusoft, I've been using my own RBL zone file on my DNS server, but I'd
like to have SA check it as well.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek
Hey Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> See why I don't need bayes or net tests ;) I catch 99% of
> spam. I've had a breakthru today that should catch the ones
> that have been sneaking in. (Matt and JMason, the doc I sent
> you guys has a pattern in the Message-ID he
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:24 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> > -Original Messag
Hi Chris,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> Nope, sorry. Didn't catch that. THey are run from seperate cf
> files in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir. They are run for the
> entire company! Every bit of email that enters company is
> subject to all of these rules.
Matt's rul
> -Original Message-
> From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
> > > -Ori
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM
> >
> > Do you have a feel for the number of rules that would need to be
> > in user_prefs to have a significant impact on perform
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:08 AM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
>
>
> >
Hi Tom,
You can find it here:
http://www.wot.no-ip.com/show.me/Projects/Blocklist/
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Meunier
> A google of [reg2rule] and [reg2rule.pl] brings up nada.
> Throw me a bone?
---
This SF.net
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre
> I'm not sure about performance loss. I have every rule (That isn't a
> duplicate) in the SA rule emporeum running now. Plus all the
> evil domains generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I
> haven't put on the Emporeum yet. I say I h
Thanks Matt! Points well taken. As I only use SA on a gateway with very
limited access, I have not been too worried about the potential spamd
exploit. However, user_prefs is not my first choice. In fact, I would
rather use local.cf with spamd. I just don't like the idea of restarting
spamd eve
, 2003 8:12 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'; 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
[ ]
> evil domains
> generated by reg2rule.pl, plus more custom ones I haven't put on the
[ ]
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:58 AM
> To: 'Matt Kettler'; spamassassin_list
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rules - spamd
>
>
> Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too igno
At 8/25/03 09:05 PM , Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yes, this is normal. I understand v.2.60 can be given a HUP signal, like
At 00:05 26/08/2003 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yep.
Regards,
Simon
Thanks Matt! I hope this question is not too ignorant . . . Do you have a
feel for the number of rules that would need to be in user_prefs to have a
significant impact on performance relative to spamd with everything else
being equal? I am just looking for a rough guess. I could imagine that the
At 12:05 AM 8/26/03 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yes, local.cf and all of the /usr/share/spamassassin/*.cf files are
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Regards,
Larry
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM W
Alex J. Avriette wrote:
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have the following rules:
[snip]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=4.0
tests=AMIKA_SPAM,HTML_70_80,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_SBL
version=2.55
Is there a problem with my rules, above? Or is it that sa isn't
reading rules from local.cf?
Is there a problem with my rules, above? Or is it that sa isn't reading rules from local.cf? I can't add this to my user_prefs because I'm using qmail with virtual domains so there aren't specific users I can use here.
There doesn't seem to be any problems with those rules.
Have you run spamassa
At 02:07 PM 8/17/03 -0400, Alex J. Avriette wrote:
Is there a problem with my rules, above? Or is it that sa isn't reading
rules from local.cf? I can't add this to my user_prefs because I'm using
qmail with virtual domains so there aren't specific users I can use here.
There doesn't seem to be a
In /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf I have the following rules:
# amika
header AMIKA_SPAM X-AmikaGuardian-Action =~ /Junk Mail/
score AMIKA_SPAM 2
header AMIKA_BUSINESS X-AmikaGuardian-Action =~ /Business/
score AMIKA_BUSINESS -2
"AmikaGuardian" is Speakeasy's (pretty awful, but getting better) sp
t: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:20 PM
> > To: SA-Talk
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql -- body BUG?
> >
> >
> > hmmm. actually this is having a problem working for body also.
> >
> > I do however get "Checking priveleged com
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:20 PM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql -- body BUG?
>
>
> hmmm. actually this is having a problem working for body also.
>
>
|
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
T
ED] | score ADAM_TEST| 100 |
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc:
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> dallas,
>
> in order to make a rule like
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> dallas,
>
> in order to make a rule like
>
, 2003-07-28 at 14:41, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> > > To: Dallas L. Engelken
> > > Cc: SA-Talk
> > > Subject: RE:
nenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> > To: Dallas L. Engelken
> > Cc: SA-Talk
> > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
> >
> >
> > I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
> >
> > My que
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:28 PM
> To: Dallas L. Engelken
> Cc: SA-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> I am actually using prefs perfectly with the DB.
>
>
lken wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:44 AM
> > To: SA-Talk
> > Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
> >
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I am usi
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:44 AM
> To: SA-Talk
> Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I am using SA 2.55 with mysql user prefs.
>
> Does any
Hey guys,
I am using SA 2.55 with mysql user prefs.
Does anybody know if its possible to use per-domain/user rules using
mysql?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-com
st
*Subject:* [SAtalk] Custom Rules Forum? Listing?
Is there a forum, list or anything for custom rules that people
have tested, are coming up with?
If not would anyone be interested in one?
Bill
I have an unused forum site at http://www.tark.us that may u
regex.) I have
everyone to thank every morning when my spamtrap is full.
Thanks
Chris
(still
learning to write better regex)
-Original Message-From: Nichols, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:02
PMTo: Spamassassin-ListSubject: [SAtalk] Custom Rules
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nichols, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Spamassassin-List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rules Forum? Listing?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello
Hello William,
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 11:44:00 PM, you wrote:
NW> What is a Wiki?
NW> Bill Nichols
See http://wiki.org/wiki.cgi?WhatIsWiki
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:41:05PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> A Wiki is one of the easiest ways to set up space for
> collaborative contributions.
Great idea - a Wiki is not only one of the easiest, but one of the best
ways to set this up!
Regards: Jim Ford
--
Spam poison - don't use! --
What is a Wiki?
Bill Nichols
-Original Message-
From: Abigail Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 5:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RM> If someone can come up with a good method of discussing/exchanging
RM> custom rules that won't seriously impact the value of
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 01:41, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> RM> If someone can come up with a good method of discussing/exchanging custom
> RM> rules that won't seriously impact the value of this basic list, I have
> RM> some resources available at menschel.net we can use for that purpose.
>
> A Wiki i
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 01:41, Abigail Marshall wrote:
> RM> If someone can come up with a good method of discussing/exchanging custom
> RM> rules that won't seriously impact the value of this basic list, I have
> RM> some resources available at menschel.net we can use for that purpose.
>
> A Wiki i
RM> If someone can come up with a good method of discussing/exchanging custom
RM> rules that won't seriously impact the value of this basic list, I have
RM> some resources available at menschel.net we can use for that purpose.
A Wiki is one of the easiest ways to set up space for
collaborative con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello William,
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 12:01:59 PM, you wrote:
NW> Is there a forum, list or anything for custom rules that people have
NW> tested, are coming up with?
NW> If not would anyone be interested in one?
I've benefited from the rules peop
Is there a forum,
list or anything for custom rules that people have tested, are coming up
with?
If not would anyone
be interested in one?
Bill
At 03:31 PM 6/2/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
Can one do body content filtering with custom SA rules? How about
custom subject filtering?
Yes.. I've got a guide on doing your own simple body and header rules.
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/mkettler/sa/SA-rules-howto-draft.txt
--
Can one do body content filtering with custom SA rules? How about
custom subject filtering?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
Is it possible to manually add spamphrases? I tried adding some to a local file in
/etc/mail/spamassassin, but they never seem to take after restarting spamd. Can
someone explain how the number you assign the spam phrase reflects the scoring?
Thanks
--
Ok, I have written my custom rules and assigned it a 0 value in my local.cf.
Now I need to know what entries to use in my SQL table for me to give (just
me) a higher value than 0 for that rule. The rule name is
PORNOGRAPHIC_TERMS. I can't use user preference files because out SA is
spread across
"Doug Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it possible to create a custom rule and have it applied only for
> certain users? We are using a MySQL database for the preferences and
> would like to write a rule that filters out common pornographic terms
> and assigns them a VERY high score to s
Is it possible to create a custom rule and have it
applied only for certain users? We are using a MySQL database for the
preferences and would like to write a rule that filters out common
pornographic terms and assigns them a VERY high score to start with. Then
we want to give the user the
Tom Allison wrote:
> Klaus Heinz wrote:
> >A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
> >rules specified in the users' configuration file. 'body' rules should
> >work, though. See also
> >
>
> This doesn't apply to Mail::SpamAssassin?
As the mistake happened in PerMs
Klaus Heinz wrote:
Patrick Bores wrote:
Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
Any ideas as to why this is happening?
A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
rules specified in the us
Patrick Bores wrote:
> Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
> Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
> Any ideas as to why this is happening?
A mistake (corrected in the most current CVS sources) disabled 'header'
rules specified in the users' configuration fi
I should have mentioned. I've restarted spamd countless times, it
still does not work.
Patrick
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 11:15 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
Did you restart spamd?
service spamassassin restart
--or--
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
--or--
Whatever your flavor of *nix us
Did you restart spamd?
service spamassassin restart
--or--
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
--or--
Whatever your flavor of *nix uses to stop and restart the spamd
service.
-Michael
>>> Patrick Bores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/11/02 10:34AM >>>
Hello,
I have the following in my user_prefs file:
Hello,
I have the following in my user_prefs file:
header MY_WHITELIST Subject=~/test/
score MY_WHITELIST -100
Piping a message to spamassassin applies the rule correctly.
Piping the same message to spamc ignores the rule.
My local.cf file looks like this:
allow_user_rules 1
rewrite_subjec
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:13 AM
To: David Brossard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Rule STILL being ignored
Wait, are you trying to blacklist a subject or a received? The last time
you posted this rule it was a received header rule.
Your rule for MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD is
Wait, are you trying to blacklist a subject or a received? The last time
you posted this rule it was a received header rule.
Your rule for MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD is changing quite drastically. Do you
have multiple rules with this name?
Each of your own custom rules need to have their own distinct
: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 2:40 PM
To: David Brossard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Custom Rule STILL being ignored
The most debug output you can get from spamassassin is by running:
spamassassin -tD Is there a way to get more debug output from spamassassin (not spamd or
>sp
The most debug output you can get from spamassassin is by running:
spamassassin -tD
Note that sample-nonspam.txt is included in the SpamAssassin tarball.
I'd run the debug output version of SA above and look at where spamasin
is reading your user_prefs file and make sure that rule is in th
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 01:26:13PM -0800, Steve Thomas wrote:
> Do you have a 'describe' line in there? I don't know if SA requires it, but
describe isn't required. You only need the rule defined. The description
and score are autogenerated if none are specified.
BTW: I just double-checked and
|
| header MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD ALL=~/coolfunpages\.com/i
| score MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD 100
|
Do you have a 'describe' line in there? I don't know if SA requires it, but
I use a number of custom rules without any trouble and they all have a
description. Here's one example t
I want to thank everyone for their help so far in trying to get a custom
rule working with my Spam Assassin. At this point its getting pretty
frustrating. It also doesn't help that I am more familiar with shell
type Reg Exp rather than what Perl uses. A quick recap:
header MY_BLACKLISTED_
: [SAtalk] Custom Rule bein ignored
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:40:16AM -0800, Brossard, David wrote:
> > header MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD
Received=~/*coolfunpages.com/
I think the problem is that the RE should be .* not * (it's regular
expression, not file globbing ... :) )
$ perl -e
Re-read the suggested rule I gave you, it does NOT contain a *. In fact,
it's a regex syntax error to have the * where you put it.
When adding custom rules I strongly recommed that you run spamassassin
--lint so you can see it complain about syntactic errors like your version
had. Under normal
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:55:26AM -0800, Brossard, David wrote:
> Ah. Well then it begs the question, how do I get it to filter
> smtp69.coolfunpages.com and smtpX.coolfunpages.com?
As I stated, use ".*" instead of "*". I would personally use something
like /smtp.{1,5}\.coolfunpages\.com/i
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 10:40:16AM -0800, Brossard, David wrote:
> > header MY_BLACKLISTED_RCVD Received=~/*coolfunpages.com/
I think the problem is that the RE should be .* not * (it's regular
expression, not file globbing ... :) )
$ perl -e 'print yes if /*foo/'
Quantifier follows
Thanks for the response. I actually tried that originally and
thought it was being ignored for the spaces.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mason [mailto:jm@;jmason.org]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:38 AM
To: Brossard, David
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk
Brossard, David said:
> I asked earlier about a way to block messages if they are
> received from a certain set of servers. Someone very kindly provided me
> with a custom rule to filter them out via header info. Unfortunately no
> matter what I try the new custom rule is being ignored. I h
I asked earlier about a way to block messages if they are
received from a certain set of servers. Someone very kindly provided me
with a custom rule to filter them out via header info. Unfortunately no
matter what I try the new custom rule is being ignored. I have other
custom headers with
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
