Why does HABEAS_SWE score -8.0? EVERYmessage that I recieve that matches
that criteria is spam. I've since added 16 point to HABEAS_SWE.
Jeff
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Sof
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:20 AM 1/14/04 -0500, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
No. I wouldn't expect it to read PDFs. For example, just now it didn't
read these types:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit, Size: 1.7K --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 2.3K --]
[-- Type: text/html,
ll 8-bit MIME attachments, but
recently I noticed that it didn't read some 7-bit attachments as well.
Is there a directive I can use to make spam assassin read all body
attachments?
Cheers,
Jeff
--
#include
int main(){int a[]={74,117,115,116,32,97,110,111,116,104,101,114,32, \
67,32,10
No. I wouldn't expect it to read PDFs. For example, just now it didn't
read these types:
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit, Size: 1.7K --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 2.3K --]
[-- Type: text/html, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 4.3K --]
Cheers,
Jeff
O Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at
ugh unscanned.
Since my match adds points to any message whose body does NOT contain
the keywords, I'm getting false matches when the body is not scanned for
the words. Is there anyway I can get around this?
Cheers,
Jeff
---
This SF.
_
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is
We're being hit by MS security update emails. I know they're not spam,
but rather more accurately described as virii or worms.
However, I'm wondering if anyone has a good rule that will mark these?
Thanks.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riversid
weak formmail script and then
we have a potential problem. Or possibly if we end up with a spammer as a
user. So I am simply asking if there is a method we can use with qmail to
SA check outgoing email and close this possibility.
At 12:01 PM 12/20/2003, you wrote:
Jeff Koch wrote:
We've b
Hi,
We've been burned a few times by spammers getting into our servers to send
out spam. Does anyone know (or can provide a reference) for how SA could be
integrated into qmail to examine outgoing emails?
Thanks.
Jeff Koch
---
t /var/dcc/map, so I
don't think the map file is the problem.
debug: Pyzor is not available: pyzor not found
Looks like I've got another module to install.
Can anyone else offer me any suggestions?
Thanks.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Profes
indications in my caught spam,
and I'm only catching about 2/3 of the spam hitting us, so it's time
for me to learn more and do some more configuring.
I've read man pages and the website but I'm still confused. If anyone
can point me in the right direction, I'd appreciate
future so it
updates that database?
Thanks.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation
Our blists address used on lists is for list email only
Phone +1 909 324-9706,
d downloading the source and making manually. I get the same
failure during 'make test'.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 7:34 PM
To: Jeff Funk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Upgrade problem . . .
Did you install the Time::Hi
I'm trying upgrade on CPAN and I keep getting failed tests like below:
t/spamc_c_stdout_closed.spamd start failed: log: debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: Preloading modules with HOME=/tmp/spamd-57489-init
Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at
../blib/li
nitely non-spam content hosted on those servers, I think
the yimg.com domains have to go.
Jeff
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Lin
hour.
-jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan
> Bongert
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin hogging 100% CPU time
>
>
> We just rolled out Sp
Assassin than mine (approximately a month or so)?
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation
Our blists address used on lists is for list email only
Phone +1 909 324-9706, or see: &
is (one of) India's largest ISPs. It'd be like
> blocking AOL.
Blocking large ISPs may be the only way to get their attention.
> Don't bother emailing the domain
> contacts, they'll probably bounce.
Domain contacts bounce? That's a great reason to block a dom
mail client or forward this email to a web-based mail system.
My question is simply is this okay to filter on? Or does anyone have
any experience of any legitimate email coming with this?
Thanks.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professional Int
ed (%) / cleaned
Could someone send me the script directly, please. I get this maillist via the digest
and my digest was cut off somewhere in the middle of the script for some reason...
TIA
Jeff
jj(at)rbza.com
---
This SF.net email is spons
We were having issues with
SA slowing to a crawl and messages backing up in the queue so I decided to try cgpsa
and see if the problem would go away. After getting it set up yesterday,
everything performed perfectly for about 16 hours and 55000 messages. Then,
all of a sudden, at around 9
We were having issues with SA slowing to a crawl and messages backing up
in the queue so I decided to try cgpsa and see if the problem would go
away. After getting it set up yesterday, everything performed perfectly
for about 16 hours and 55000 messages. Then, all of a sudden, at around
9am CDT,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:37:53AM -0400, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> Does anyone else have trouble getting their messages on the list in
> a timely fashion? It seems when I reply to the list it takes 15 to
> 45 minutes for my message to appear. By the time my reply shows up,
> 3 other people have r
> I, as well as others here too, have the same dilema.
We're in the hosting business, and we use commercial control panels. So
we're limited to an OS that the control panels support. We've already
made a decision to begin provisioning new servers on FreeBSD. Because
that'
I could donate some bandwidth to the cause. I've got a surplus of outbound bandwidth
. . .
-Original Message-
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:25 PM
To: 'Jennifer Wheeler'
Cc: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Too many ru
beyond-mortal abilities then ; I've always attacked sendmail.cf
directly .
But I am leaving it behind. My guess is that the company's emphasis on
selling commercial product and services has kept them from moving along
with the open source base. So now there are (imho) better choi
s filtering process highlights the dangers of
open-source projects
Gee, I thought sendmail was pro open-source.
Does Wacky Wacker forget for a moment that the company that
funds his paycheck is built on a product that's entirely open source?
I've learned something today.
To leave Se
eated normally.
Any thoughts would be appreciated and I apologize for the off-topic email.
Jeff Koch
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who ha
don't want.
Disclaimer: None of this has anything to do with the Hormel brand
product "Spam" of course .
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation
Our blists address used on list
? Is the user_prefs file necessary (what I want is
system-wide learning)?
Thanks.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation
Our blists address used on lists is for list email only
Phone +1 909
On Friday 10 October 2003 07:32, Martin Schroeder wrote:
> On 2003-10-10 07:14:56 -0700, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> > And one more thing... though I don't see it mentioned, I'm
> > presuming from the sa-learn manpage that I don't have to remove the
> > already exist
manpage that I don't have to remove the already
existing SpamAssassin headers from either the spam or the ham; that
sa-learn will ignore them. Is that correct?
Thanks.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professional Internet Services & Suppor
On Monday 06 October 2003 11:22, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> I'm a complete newcommer to SpamAssassin and I've been a list-member
> only since Friday, so please go easy on me if I'm breaking any list
> protocols. I'm running the DirectAdmin Control Panel
> (http://www.d
in folk don't know anything at
all about SpamAssassin and my request for help to their support forum
has gotten me no replies from anyone, so I hope someone here can help
me.
I have a DirectAdmin test system I can offer for anyone to look at who
might be interested in helping.
Thanks in adv
http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk maili
score X_NJABL_DIALUP 0
score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL_FH0
score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY0
score X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC 0
score X_OSIRU_SPAMWARE_SITE 0
At 07:12 PM 9/30/2003, you wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:32:23PM -0400, Jeff Koch is rumored to
core=7.1 required=4 t
ests=CLICK_BELOW,EXCUSE_1,EXCUSE_15,NO_REAL_NAME,OPT_IN_CAPS,PLING_PLING,RCVD_IN_
BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SUBJ_DOLLARS
At 06:45 PM 9/30/2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:32:23PM -0400, Jeff Koch wrote:
> Does it make sense that our maillog would report it take
aven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by
spamd (multiple times.)
I've set the directory and user_prefs to world
readable/executable and I don't see any errors in the logs.
I'd appreciate any suggestions for a fix!
Jeff
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
We
s that had gone through five reply
cycles between a client and his customer - both use Outlook. The second
occurs on all email being sent to us from one client who uses Roadrunner as
their ISP in Tampa.
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
---
This
tive
look like. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
s.
I looked in /usr/share/spamassassin/20_porn.cf but it was not clear how to
turn the porn filtering on and/or where new words should be added. Any
advice would be appreciated.
Best Regards,
Jeff Koch
---
This sf.net email is spon
So what does the average person set for the threshold of largest message
scanned by SA. Right now I'm at 32768 bytes. How large is it safe to
go???
Jeffrey J Funk
Chief Technology Officer
Farin & Associates, Inc.
608.661.4240
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
So what does the average person set for the threshold of largest message
scanned by SA. Right now I'm at 32768 bytes. How large is it safe to
go???
Jeffrey J Funk
Chief Technology Officer
Farin & Associates, Inc.
608.661.4240
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
al Message-
From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:25 AM
To: Jeff Funk
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Any ideas
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jeff Funk wrote:
> The header below is from an e-mail that seems to get through sa repe
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from bandoog.com ([209.83.8.50]) by mail.farin.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 00:40:43 -0500
Received: from [218.75.22.22] (HELO 209.83.8.50)
by bandoog.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3)
with SMTP id 132
ournal /home/foouser/.spamassassin/bayes_journal
( of 205), recovering.
Spamd didn't fail, but the same process tried over and over to write to
bayes_journal. Is there a way to make spamd just give up if it can't
write to the bayes_journal?
--
Any help will be gr
, i had to run db3_upgrade on bayes_seen and bayes_toks.)
thanks,
--
+----+
| jeff covey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pobox.com/~jeff.covey
when i pipe a message to "sa-learn --single --spam", i'm suddenly
getting:
Cannot open bayes_path /home/jeff/.spamassassin/bayes R/O: Inappropriate ioctl for
device
Cannot open bayes_path /home/jeff/.spamassassin/bayes R/W: File exists
Learned from 0 messages.
Cannot open bayes_
Here's a header of an e-mail I just received. The F'word has been replaced with X's.
Isn't there a default rule in SA somewhere that would catch that? Seems like a pretty
obvious nasty to me . . . .
Subject: Naked victims being XX
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=6.6
tests=DAT
OK, then the question still begs an answer . . . how do I get the stuff out of Outlook
and into sa-learn???
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Jeff Funk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Trouble training bayes
I'm sure this is a silly question, but it's one that I haven't been able
to find documentation on and has kept me from using the Bayes stuff in
SA. Does it matter whether the header info is included in the e-mail
when submitted to sa-learn? From what has been said in this thread, it
sounds like o
(--dir,
--file –mbox) but none worked. Am I doing this correctly?
Please help.
Thanks,
Jeff
nd hope for the best.
thanks,
--
+----+
| jeff covey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pobox.com/~jeff.covey/ 410-869-8088 |
||
| The site si
on Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:51:30AM +0200%, Tony Earnshaw said:
jeff> 75 spam messages have been recorded as ham. i don't have
jeff> the original messages, so i can't use sa-learn to unlearn
jeff> them. how can i keep the spam i've given the filter but
je
ecause i reported them. how can
i keep my spam data, erase my ham data, and start training with ham
from scratch?
sincerely,
--
++
| jeff covey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pobox.com/~jeff.covey/ 410-
n-talk&m=105586966928433&w=2
here's the question again:
jeff> 75 spam messages have been recorded as ham. i don't have
jeff> the original messages, so i can't use sa-learn to unlearn
jeff> them. how can i keep the spam i've given the filter but
jeff> w
abuse
reporting services by submitting information no one else can use.
thanks,
--
++
| jeff covey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pobox.com/~jeff.covey/ 410-869-8088 |
||
| Hi! I think that this site, woul
rning as ham, i was directed to:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027
and replied to theo privately with:
http://jeffcovey.net/tmp/sa/
i hope that helps.
thanks,
--
+----+
| jeff covey [EMAIL PROT
; i doubt that i'll ever
receive a copy with your name. am i not understanding something about
how this works?
--
+----+
| jeff covey [EMAIL
ven the filter but wipe out all the
ham, so i can start training ham from scratch?
thanks,
--
++
| jeff covey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pobox.com/~jeff.covey/ 410-869-8088 |
||
|sir., I am doing a project called
Try an "updatedb" to update the locate database. Then try the locate spamc | grep -iv
spool again. If you had a stale db, that might explain why locate didn't find
anything...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jody Cleveland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10,
administrator email me off-list about having the same problem.
If you email me again, I can tell you what changed.
All I remember, is you were using FreeBSD, and IIRC perl
v5.8.0
Jeff Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes and no. If there are patents involved, McAfee can excercise them to
stop entirely the distribution of anything but their proprietary
internal code.
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:36:57AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see this acquisition as a sellout. Plain and si
Which brings me to a question... what exactly did they purchase? If
they purchased Deersoft, does that give them the right to enforce the
trademark and prevent the open source Unix style SpamAssassin product
from using that name? Do they hold patents that could shut down the
open source SA pr
This managed to get through twice today.
Here is the entire header (message below):
(btw: I have two separate qmail-scanner instances. One runs virus scanning,
one runs SA)
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 580 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003
0-15-exp)
Running spamd in debug mode gives no indication of errors or misconfiguration.
Anyone have any ideas what may be broken? I'd prefer to continue using
spamassassin for my mailserverÜø®Ôut it is using way too much in the way of
resources.
Jeff
--
Matt,
could you do me a favor temporarily?
The first recipe, change spamc to spamassassin and see if it works correctly?
I'm having the same issue you mention with spamc/spamd always giving a
score of 0/0 but spamassassin works.
Jeff
At 07:59 PM 12/18/2002 -0500, Matthew Smith wrot
,
“spamassassin” actually works as expected :
spamassassin -t <
sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.out
spamassassin -t <
sample-spam.txt > spam.out
What would cause spamc/spamd to
not work, when spamassassin works as intended?
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
N_NJABL Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org
score RCVD_IN_NJABL 1.0
I searched the archives and didn't see any references to RBL checks not
being performed or logged. Anyone have any input on what's happening?
Thanks,
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Mik
other
services, all of which were upping the load. The biggest problem we had
was CPU rather than memory.
Hope this helps.
Jeff
--
Jeff Engelhardt Unix & Network Administrator
Department of Information Technology
Gustavus Adolphus College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gac.edu/~jengelha
think I got
around that problem setting LANG=C in the environment before starting
spamd. Is there a better fix for this?
Thanks
Jeff
--
Jeff Engelhardt Unix & Network Administrator
Department of Information Technology
Gustavus Adolphus College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gac.edu/~jeng
o be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
>
> You can't. SA just filters mail. Anything else you want to do is on
> your own.
I would recommend MIMEDefang. It uses SpamAssassin, and will allow you
to resend the message.
Jeff
--
Jeff Grossman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and suggestions. As I gather more useful information I would
be happy to post to the list later to help others as they start and plan
with it.
Thanks
Jeff
--
Jeff Engelhardt Unix & Network Administrator
Department of Information Technology
Gustavus Adolphus College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fetchmail's 'mta' option and point it directly at procmail. As fetchmail
executes the "mta" synchronously, you will only have one copy of procmail and
one copy of spamassassin running at a time. No need to get a real MTA involved
at all.
-- Jeff
Quoting Jan
clients. It is also our main campus file server. We have
around 5000 accounts and deliver around 70,000 to 80,000 messages a day.
Should we be able to do it with this machine? If so, why are we seeing
problems when only 20 of us are using spamassassin?
Thanks
Jeff
--
Jeff Engelhardt Unix
However, maybe this could be done inside qmail-scanner. Maybe spamc
exits with a specific error code if it gets a positive result from spamd?
That might be the answer to my project..
-Jeff
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence t
ing something in the documentation somewhere? I'm running 1.14 qmail
scanner and the latest (2.43) spamd/spamc.
-Jeff
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JC
tware. I think
it'd be sweet revenge if SpamAssassin tagged McAfee spam. (It might, I'm
running 2.30 on this domain and about to move to 2.43)
-Jeff
- Forwarded message from "McAfee.com Store" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:58:26 -0700
From: &qu
D]
> Subject: Your Daily Luann
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain
You should try whitelist_from *@*unitedmedia.com
Jeff
--
Jeff Grossman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to g
from" in the email, so this is
> often always "root".)
>
> Lots of whitelist mistakes in SA 2.4x have to do with not understanding how
> whitelist_from_rcvd works and using it improperly.
>
> At 08:20 AM 10/11/2002 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
>> I am using SpamAss
d, 9 Oct 2002 04:02:04 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost)
by apple.stikman.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g99B21cq002283
for jeff; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 04:02:01 -0700
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 04:02:01 -0700
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTE
I have a feeling someone may have already thought of this, but I've been
tossing this idea around in my head lately.
If you're scanning on a domain basis (or just one account) and you drop a copy
of every identified spam into a place for later review, couldn't we somehow
extract the IP address o
Can someone point out to me where spamc/spamd identifies the recipient of a
message when comparing it to all/more_spam_to entries in local.cf ?
I've found a bug in SA where if the recipient is not listed in the To: or cc:
line of the message SA is ignorant of the true recipient. This causes it
there any GUI interfaces that work with vpopmail that I am just
missing? This whole problem could be solved if I could give everyone the
ability to turn SA on and off in individual .qmail- files instead of
scanning the entire domain by default.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-Jeff
-
he record, we've had the exact same thing with our installation.
I'd probably say that 1/3 to 1/2 of our mail isn't being scanned at all.
The headers aren't even being rewritten.
I'm guessing that this isn't a totally isolated issue.
- Jeff
--
My ISP recently installed SA 2.20, and I'm starting to poke around
with it. I'd like to configure SA to /not/ report /any/ incoming spam to the
various blacklists it can report to. The reason I want to do this is that
I'm using another spam filter currently, and would like to add spamassas
erings, just to show that
it's not impossible or impractical.
Thanks!
- Jeff
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -
http://devcon.sprintpcs.co
r that will make
SpamAssassin will recognize it as not spam. Any recommended way?
- Jeff -
earch for "List-Unsubscribe" case
sensitive? (i.e. will it trigger if there is a list-unsubscribe:
line?)
- Jeff -
P.S. I suppose I also need to add to 50_scores.cf a line like
score HAS_UNSUB -4.0
P.P.S. I know many mailing lists have a bunch of List-*: header lines
like Lis
oned processing add
some sort of SpamAssassin flag so when the message is returned to the
original recipient's e-mail account, it isn't re-flagged as Spam
again?
- Jeff -
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Today I feel like the only fire hydrant at
This was working before I updated RH 7.2 with the new errata for glibc
Here is a test with both using the sample on the command linenote the
lack of SPAM in the output of the first one.just returns without
tagging.
[root@the-techy spamassassin-2.11]# cat sample-spam.txt | /usr/bin/spamc |
I just noticed this as well. I think that, since I have several boxes using
spamc that no longer return any spam identification after the new 2.2.4-24
glibc was added that this C library change may be the culprit? Anyone else
experience this?
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Wolber" <[EM
AIN; charset=US-ASCII
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.11
>>
>>new test
>>
>>
>>Craig Hughes wrote:
>>
>>>Could be a missing 'From ' line at the head of the email. When you say
>>>it shows up in the spool
Anyone else see this: spamd is running and it marks a message as clean and the
message is in my mail spool /var/spool/mail/jjbacon but does not show up in Pine
or any IMAP client?? This only happens after mail is modified by spamc. I use
the /etc/procmailrc method of calling spamc:
:0fw
| spa
fault_prefs for
[/home/jjbacon/.spamassassin/user_prefs]
dir perms:
drwx--2 jjbacon jjbacon 4096 Mar 6 08:13 .spamassassin
--
Jeff
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
I'll throw my 2-cents in and let y'all know I have the same problem
Gene Ruebsamen wrote:
> Quoting Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>>when I run spamc < sample-spam.txt > spam.out
>>>spamc seems to work; however, when I receive an incoming mail message, I
>>
>>get
>>
>>Does it work or
ok, so I added "-u mail" for spamd's startup and now have this in my
main log:
Mar 19 10:20:27 bacon spamd[22447]: connection from localhost [
127.0.0.1 ] at port 44544
Mar 19 10:20:27 bacon spamd[22490]: Creating default_prefs
[/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs]
Mar 19 10:20:27 bacon spamd[22490
(procmail is used for local delivery, sendmail for everything else)
ok, so I have a /etc/procmailrc file with only:
:0fw
| spamc
in it and spamd running as: "spamd -d -c -a -F 0" but still no
X-Spam-Status header is added to my mail.
Greg Ward wrote:
>On 18 March 2002, Je
I have to add to get it to scan my email as it arrives in sendmail?
Jeff
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
