I'm trying upgrade on CPAN and I keep getting failed tests like below: t/spamc_c_stdout_closed.....spamd start failed: log: debug: Score set 0 chosen. debug: Preloading modules with HOME=/tmp/spamd-57489-init Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1077. Can't locate auto/Time/HiRes/time.al in @INC (@INC contains: lib ../blib/lib /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/i386-freebsd /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.1/i386-freebsd /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl) at ../blib/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1077
Maybe you need to kill a running spamd process? I don't have any running spamd processes. Anybody have a clue?? I'm running FreeBSD 4.9_STABLE. J. -----Original Message----- From: Alex S Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Help with DCC setup for use with Spamassaian On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:52:10 -0500 stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ..snip> Yes, I just erviewd the firewall config. It will pass all trafic > originating on the innsied. I see that may not be a good general case, but > it should be OK here (Small home network). > > BTW, I decided to try (breifly) disabling all packet firewalling. Guess > what? cdcc still says "No servers responfing". > > Any thoughts on where to go now? > > I know this sounds odd and it is, but I am not sure that running cdcc info goes out to check for working servers until a period of time has elapsed. I do think that some RTT times are calculated as soon as you run the program. Assuming that I am correct, check the top of the output from cdcc info. There is a time listed where DCC will re-resolve names for working servers. It is at that point that the network needs to be working. Strange, is it not? I have spent many hours pouring over the vast quantities of material on the DCC project and there is still a lot that I do not fully understand. That said, I still like using DCC. The time spent for this additional network access by SA is worth it in my case. That time is typically .25 sec. The time required for some other blacklist operations can be quite large. Of course, that is just my experience and you may have different results. I have seen many spam emails that SA would have accepted as ham, if not for the dcc check. Alex Moore ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
