I could donate some bandwidth to the cause.  I've got a surplus of outbound bandwidth 
. . . 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:25 PM
To: 'Jennifer Wheeler'
Cc: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Too many rules?


not much at all. I might average around 300+ hits a week. really just a
trickle. I don't even have a fast connection and it doesn't seem to effect
us at all. I can probably move it to a personal page on my home provider as
well. I think I might do that too. It peaks after an update, but then dies
out, until the next. 

I'm pretty sure I'm just going to mirror it to personal site at home. Just
for piece of mind more then anything else. Like the saying goes, "Real men
upload and let the internet be their backup." or something like that in
Theo's sig ;)

Chris S. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:45 PM
> To: 'Chris Santerre'; 'Robert Leonard III'
> Cc: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)'
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Too many rules?
> 
> 
> How much bandwidth / month does it average??
> 
> Jennifer
> 
> >I don't have ftp running on the server. I was actually going 
> to see if
> >anyone wanted to mirror my site, or just the files. I think
> distributing >the lists to another site is a good idea. Any takers for
> mirroring?
> 
> --Chris
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Leonard III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 10:48 AM
> > To: Chris Santerre
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Too many rules?
> > 
> > 
> > Okay, well it must be something else then.. actually the 
> > evilrules.cf are
> > the ones that wont --lint and seem to cause the system to 
> > freeze.. my guess
> > is that they somehow get hidden characters when I save them 
> > down.  My linux
> > box only has 'lynx' so I visit your rules via http and then 
> > "Save to disk"
> > the rules.. I'll have to try and get them another way... do 
> > you have ftp
> > running with the current version anyplace?
> > 
> > Thanks Chris!
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "'Robert Leonard III'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 7:44 AM
> > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Too many rules?
> > 
> > 
> > > Well, all I can tell you is what I'm running. 266 mhz, 64 
> > megs ram, and
> > > probably around 3000 rules. Yup, I'll get an exact count 
> > later. But I test
> > > and run all the great rules people send me for the 
> > emporium. I am using
> > > spamd and I think you will see a bug difference there.
> > >
> > > The system runs nothing else. Nothing. No telnetd, no ftp, 
> > no local users,
> > > ect.... I have to get up off my butt and walk to the 
> > computer room on all
> > my
> > > servers. Nice and secure ;)
> > >
> > > I haven't had a single crash, but no load isn't that great.
> > >
> > > HTH
> > >
> > > Chris Santerre
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Robert Leonard III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 11:09 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: [SAtalk] Too many rules?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I've been playing with and implementing a lot of the rules I
> > > > have found that
> > > > many of you have contributed.. They have worked wonders for
> > > > my system..
> > > > However.... When I implemented the gigantic evilrules.cf,
> > > > they worked great
> > > > for about an hour.. Then the whole server went into such a
> > > > slow mode that I
> > > > had to do a hard reboot just to get it back.. It wasn't dead,
> > > > but just so
> > > > bogged down that it couldn't function.  My SA box is NOT a
> > > > superPC.. It's a
> > > > leftover from the closet.. So..
> > > >
> > > > Can implementing too many rules, slow down the machine to the
> > > > point of near
> > > > stoppage?  Is this something that perhaps more RAM could
> > > > help?  I'm not in a
> > > > position to replace the whole PC yet, but I can, perhaps,
> > > > beef up it's ram..
> > > >
> > > > Ahh.. If only I had all the time and money I needed :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again all!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> > > > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
> > > > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
> > > > Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> > > >
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
> See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
> Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to