This was working before I updated RH 7.2 with the new errata for glibc Here is a test with both using the sample on the command line....note the lack of SPAM in the output of the first one.....just returns without tagging.
[root@the-techy spamassassin-2.11]# cat sample-spam.txt | /usr/bin/spamc | grep SPAM [root@the-techy spamassassin-2.11]# cat sample-spam.txt | /usr/bin/spamassassin -P | grep SPAM Subject: *****SPAM***** Home Based Business for Grownups SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (15.5 hits, 5 required) SPAM: Hit! (2.3 points) From: contains numbers mixed in with letters SPAM: Hit! (0.7 points) From: does not include a real name SPAM: Hit! (3.9 points) Invalid Date: header (has AM/PM) SPAM: Hit! (1.5 points) Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC-2822 SPAM: Hit! (-1.8 points) Valid-looking To "undisclosed-recipients" SPAM: Hit! (0.6 points) Received via SMTPD32 server (SMTPD32-n.n) SPAM: Hit! (-0.7 points) Message-Id has no @ sign SPAM: Hit! (-4.6 points) BODY: Once in a lifetime, apparently SPAM: Hit! (1.6 points) BODY: Contains a tollfree number SPAM: Hit! (4.6 points) BODY: List removal information SPAM: Hit! (5.4 points) BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points) Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com SPAM: [RBL check: found 142.249.10.63.relays.osirusoft.com.] SPAM: SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results --------------------- [root@the-techy spamassassin-2.11]# Here we even have a little action from the spamd on localhost but no usual entry in the syslog for clean message or identified spam. I used to get this when you updated perl with CPAN instead of the RH rpms but this was working with 5.6.1. Please take note that this behavior has happened since the glibc update. I am not sure of the other install that I originally replied to but he did say all updates and these libraries were just made available yesterday. Is there any way to debug this? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig R Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chuck Wolber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Elie Rosenblum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:52 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc not working? > Chuck Wolber wrote: > > CW> > For this problem, define "not working"... Do incoming mails have the > CW> > X-Spam-Status header included? Is the # of hits set to 0.0? > CW> > CW> No, no X-Spam-Status header or anything. Looking at the headers and body > CW> of the incoming messages, there is no indication that spamassassin did > CW> anything to the message. > > Is the message by any chance larger than 250k? If so then spamc will pass it > through unchanged. You can control the threshold with spamc's '-s' flag. > > C > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
