I just noticed this as well. I think that, since I have several boxes using
spamc that no longer return any spam identification after the new 2.2.4-24
glibc was added that this C library change may be the culprit? Anyone else
experience this?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Wolber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:09 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] spamc not working?


>
>
> System:
> RH7.1 all RH updates applied.
> Sendmail 8.11.6 (stock, no tweaks except a different RBL)
> Razor 1.19
> Spamassassin Latest Stable
> procmail-3.21-0.71
>
>
> I start spamd as normal (with the RH startup script) and then run spamc
> with the following procmail rule from /etc/procmailrc
>
> :0fw
> | spamc
>
> It turns out that no mail gets reported that way. When I alter the
> procmail rule to the following:
>
> :0fw
> | /usr/bin/spamassassin -P
>
> Mail is reported just fine.
>
> Does anyone see what the problem is?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> -Chuck
>
> P.S. I considered spamass-milter, but since procmail comes pre-configured
> in sendmail on RH systems (and possibly others?), procmail seemed like a
> much better solution to me. Perhaps there is a piece of the puzzle that I
> missed?
>
>
> --
> Chuck Wolber
> System Administrator
> AltaServ Corporation
> (425)576-1202
> ten.vresatla@wkcuhc    "Condense facts from the vapor of nuance."
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to