Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:34:53PM +0100, Jim Ford wrote: > What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox, > bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips with!) If you're using procmail, yes. Basically you need to put the logic of "do I want to filte

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd not working anymore

On Sat, 31 May 2003, Steve Wilson wrote: > The usual apologies about this being a newbie question and all that are > proffered.. > > I've got spamd/spamc working fine on a RH9 Linux box with sendmail. I > have it being called by procmail, and it works fine. > I need to have a new email ser

RE: [SAtalk] OT: Exchange / Outlook Rule Deployment

Oh yeah. Almost forgot. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q251/1/25.ASP > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Meunier > Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 7:42 AM > To: 'Stewart, John'; 'Ron Poserina Jr.'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.slipstick.com/rules/backup.htm > h

RE: [SAtalk] OT: Exchange / Outlook Rule Deployment

http://www.slipstick.com/rules/backup.htm http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=182398 http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=196206 > > -Original Message- > From: Stewart, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:18 PM > To: 'Ron Poserina Jr.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jim Ford wrote: > However, I still see SA checking info in the headers of the whitelisted mails. > Is this normal, please? Yes. A white/black-list does not stop SA from running over a message. They simply add a certain value (positive or negative) to the

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:10:15AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > The only way to not have SA check a message is to not call SA under > certain conditions. What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox, bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips w

[SAtalk] Whitelist not working as expected.

Hi, I'm trying to get to grips with eliminating spam on my single user home machine and do my bit for the community by using Vipul's Razor. Spamassassin seems to be working well, but needs tuning. (Ironically, because of the volume of this list, I seem to spend more time reading spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] running sa + amavisd as diff user then root

lør, 31.05.2003 kl. 06.54 skrev MaciEk J. MaciAk: > allright this may be a very basic question but... > when i run' spamassassin -D --lint' and/or 'amavisd debug' > i can run them as root and get accurate results ? yes > > if not how would i run amvisd as another user on RH-LINX OS: RH 7.2, amav

RE: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

Why Those blankety-blanks! at M$, I'll have someone's head for this! they will pay dearly ;-) you pick a header then Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure which one M$ Outlook 2000 uses/picks, but is has never had an issue until this list

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

Their is another potential method you could use. Use the isbg.py imap python script to access the folders via imap and learn the spam. http://www.rogerbinns.com/isbg/ You could also use winbind to use the correcut NT usernames for the imap connection from the linux box. http://nic-ks.greatplains.n

Re: [SAtalk] New doc: Postfix + site-wide SpamAssassin + Procmailfor individual 'spam' mailboxes

could you describe an alternative scenario using cyrus On Fri, 30 May 2003, Greg Webster wrote: > Hello, SpamAssassin mailing list :) > > Some new documentation I've created. I'll be placing this online, but > figured I'd post it here as well. Maybe of some use to people :) > > Please note: File

[SAtalk] how do you prevent the X-Spam-Checker-Version header from beinggenerated

how do you prevent the X-Spam-Checker-Version header from being generated --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5

Re: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:32:19PM -0700, Ben Johansen wrote: > the Return-Path header in the emails sent from the spamassassin-talk list > is set to Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > so when I would hit reply it was going to > "spamassassin-talk-admin" > and not to > "spamassassin-talk" > > I

[SAtalk] OT: Randomly picking X addresses from a file

Since it's a slow night on the list I thought I'd ask an OT question too. It doesn't directly pertain to SA but it does pertain to anti-spam fun. Please excuse it nevertheless. Background: I have a text file of userids. It's has a very large number of userids. I can quickly append one of a

[SAtalk] Spamd not working anymore

The usual apologies about this being a newbie question and all that are proffered.. I've got spamd/spamc working fine on a RH9 Linux box with sendmail. I have it being called by procmail, and it works fine. I need to have a new email server, so I built a new RH8 machine and installed qmail

RE: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

Ok, I figured it out, sorry all for the Noise. the Return-Path header in the emails sent from the spamassassin-talk list is set to Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> so when I would hit reply it was going to "spamassassin-talk-admin" and not to "spamassassin-talk" I guess I don't understand why th

[SAtalk] running sa + amavisd as diff user then root

allright this may be a very basic question but... when i run' spamassassin -D --lint' and/or 'amavisd debug' i can run them as root and get accurate results ? yes if not how would i run amvisd as another user on RH-LINX -braindead tonite thanks (maybe Mr. Keoki knows) --

Re: [SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

I have kind of the same problem... I want my HAM to be sa-learned into sa but the messages are on a store other then the Linux box, and forwarding them will seem as if they are coming from an internal legit user. What format of file does sa-learn expect and disect ? -Maciek PS Francisco, sorry t

[SAtalk] OT: Business host w/SA needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please excuse the OT. If there is a list of business web site hosts which offer SpamAssassin among their services, I didn't find it. (I'd be willing to host one as a small contribution to the community.) Needed: A reliable web site host for a small,

Re: [SAtalk] Can I teach SA

> I have a couple of spam mails that scored a 4.0 is there a way to tell SA > that in the future this is spam? Can I use SA-learn or is that only for > bayes type filtering or do I have to add it to a black list? 'sa-learn --spam' will train the Bayes AFAIK. Train it, it will be very helpful. To

[SAtalk] Can I teach SA

I have a couple of spam mails that scored a 4.0 is there a way to tell SA that in the future this is spam? Can I use SA-learn or is that only for bayes type filtering or do I have to add it to a black list? Thanks for any help, Jon --- This

[SAtalk] Test (Return-Path)

Ben Johansen - http://www.pcforge.com -Authorized WiTango Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/WitangoGoodies.htm -Authorized Alt-N Reseller http://www.pcforge.com/AltN.htm --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for les

Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Best way to whitelist mailing list msgs?

I wouldn't mind seeing this implemented. There are many a system account that should never "see" email from outside - dependant upon the site that could include such wonders as root, administrator, sys, etc... So a blacklist_to line would be rather nice to get implemented, here we don't generally

Re[2]: [SAtalk] Best way to whitelist mailing list msgs?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Mike, Friday, May 30, 2003, 5:33:59 AM, you wrote: MARK> [...] I think there is a tiny wealth of spam-classifying MARK> information available from the set of recipients of a message. MS> I wholeheartedly agree with this statement. My domain

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd not working anymore

On Sat, 31 May 2003, Steve Wilson wrote: > Jack Gostl wrote: > > >On Sat, 31 May 2003, Steve Wilson wrote: > > > >>My /home/$user/.procmail/rules.rc file is: > >>:0fw > >>| /usr/bin/spamc > >>:0: > >>* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes > >>SPAM > >>--- > >>That now works only if I change line2 to /usr

[SAtalk] Training SA based on Outlook mailboxes

Hi: I'm running SA 2.54 in a redhat 7.2 linux box with sendmail-milter. This box is a filter between external MTA's and a Exchange server. I have everything working (SA, bayes & razor) and I was trying to use whatever spam users have in their mailboxes to train SA. So using a small VB pr

Re: [SAtalk] Ok... I missed something.....

do you have rewrite_subject 1 in your /etc/mail/local.cf, or when you installed 2.50 did you try to change this setting by editing 10_misc.cf? If you answered 10_misc.cf.. well, it was blown away by the upgrade.. make your customizations to local.cf not 10_misc.cf. Anything in /usr/share/spamas

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

Hi Tom, > We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became > severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. [...] In each > case, we had around 150 spamd processes running, with 2.5 GB of swap in use > on a machine with 250 MB of memory! > > Each time I noticed th

Re: [SAtalk] How can i tell if razor is working?

Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > only problem is, i can't seem to figure out if its actually running it > or not -- anyone know how to tell? Use the "-D" (debug) option. If your running spamd (on Red Hat, at least), you can modify the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file to include "-

[SAtalk] How can i tell if razor is working?

Sounds dumb, but I've got the razor check specified in the spamassassin configuration file, and I've got it naming a specific razor file for sitewide filtering too only problem is, i can't seem to figure out if its actually running it or not -- anyone know how to tell?

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

Theo wrote: > In 2.5x, if you're going to do manual expires, change the expiry_count > value to something really large. > > In 2.6x, just do 'bayes_auto_expire 0'. ;) Okay, so I just set the bayes_expiry_scan_count to 50 (as Dallas suggested in his previous email, and you do here). No expira

[SAtalk] New doc: Postfix + site-wide SpamAssassin + Procmail for individual 'spam' mailboxes

Hello, SpamAssassin mailing list :) Some new documentation I've created. I'll be placing this online, but figured I'd post it here as well. Maybe of some use to people :) Please note: File locations are based on my own install. Yours may be different, and should be checked and appropriate changes

RE: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

The implementations of amavis I have seen rely on a seperate user for the Amavis daemon to run in. whatever this user is the auto-whitelist file will be created in is home directory as .spamassassin/auto-whitelist e.g /var/amavis/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist, you can check this by copying the check

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:16:14PM -0500, Stewart, John wrote: > *check* the database to see if an expiration should be run. Is this expected > behaviour? If so, what the heck is the point to the --force-expire flag if a > new call to SA will cause an expiration check to run anyway? force-expire o

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:38:18PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote: > With all the talk about problems tracking spamd log entries, I'm curious > why nobody has simply tried "grep spamd /var/log/maillog" and done some > *very* basic sorting on the resulting output. I don't see why that Of course I tried

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

> -Original Message- > From: Stewart, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:16 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire? > > > I've got the bayes_expiry_scan_count left at the default >

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

Hi there, We are doing about 100,000 messages per day with a PIII 933 / 256MB RAM and IDE hard drive! The OS is FreeBSD and the MTA is postfix. We used to have performance problems until we implemented the -m flag to spamd, and changed the default rbl timeout to 5s. Now we have no performance pro

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Vivek Khera wrote: > > "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64 > L> encoding). > >> How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich > >> text, but it is sent clear. > > L> You

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 30 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: Has anyone gotten a reply from these kinds of posts after you answer them. I think the score is like 1-6. 1 reply after we all answered, and we've had about 6 of these kinds of posts. Didn't anyone call the person? I am s t

[SAtalk] sa-learn in 2.55 can't really force expire?

Okay, I have a more specific question which I hinted at in my previous rambling regarding amavisd-new and SA 2.55: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=105374227831594&w=2 I understand that there appears to be no way to turn off opportunistic expiration in 2.55 (this is causing no

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > Has anyone gotten a reply from these kinds of posts after you answer them. I > think the score is like 1-6. 1 reply after we all answered, and we've had > about 6 of these kinds of posts. > > Didn't anyone call the person? I am s tempted :) Make

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:38:59PM -0400, Louis Bohm wrote: > I am doing about 20k messages a day (inbound from the internet) on two > Sun Netra T1's (1 gig ram, 440 mHz single cpu, mirrored 18 gig drives). > For software I am using Sendmail, MimeDefang and SA. Works wonderfully. About the same

RE: [SAtalk] OT: Exchange / Outlook Rule Deployment

> Can anyone tell me if there is a way to deploy an Outlook rule created > to Outlook clients without manually having to create it for each user? Well, I just created detailed step-by-step instructions *with pictures* for the users to set it up on their own using the Rules Wizard. If you do figu

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

* Louis Bohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am doing about 20k messages a day (inbound from the internet) on two > Sun Netra T1's (1 gig ram, 440 mHz single cpu, mirrored 18 gig drives). > For software I am using Sendmail, MimeDefang and SA. Works wonderfully. We do twice that on a single machine (1

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

> "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64 L> encoding). >> How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich >> text, but it is sent clear. L> You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way

Re: [SAtalk] Combining 2 Bayes DB's

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:44:42PM -0400, Louis Bohm wrote: > Is there a way to merge bayes db's together? I do not like the idea of > having my two mail servers share a file system. What happens if one of > them dies. So what I was thinking is that once a day (maybe more offen) > I could merge

[SAtalk] OT: Exchange / Outlook Rule Deployment

Can anyone tell me if there is a way to deploy an Outlook rule created to Outlook clients without manually having to create it for each user? I need to push out a rule for a SpamAssassin deployment that looks for a spam tag in the header, then moves the spam tagged email into a "spam" folder in t

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

I am doing about 20k messages a day (inbound from the internet) on two Sun Netra T1's (1 gig ram, 440 mHz single cpu, mirrored 18 gig drives). For software I am using Sendmail, MimeDefang and SA. Works wonderfully. Louis On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 07:47, Jack Gostl wrote: > > I'm currently running S

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit

> From: Tony Earnshaw > > > We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became > > severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. One was on the > > 21st when dorkslayers.com went down. The other was yesterday for no > > apparent reason. In each case, we had a

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist an expression?

Whitelist_from or whitelist_from_rcvd should do it. It will bounce -100 scores to his messages. the _rcvd version will be somewhat resistant to forgery by checking both from: and received headers. You could also do a custom rule, but that's likely to be overkill. I'd only try it if whitelist_fr

Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

Well, first, you need to realize that stripping the headers off completely invalidates sample-spam.txt as a sample spam message. SA gets a LOT of its score from the header based checks and the body rules are there to catch what the header rules can't. Which scoreset does your SA use? (ie: are y

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Good afternoon, Mr. Kalune, all, On Fri, 30 May 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > Didn't anyone call the person? I did. I Left a message on his voicemail saying, essentially, "contact your admin group or the ISP in question to get spamassassin tuned; the group of developers you've contact

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

Justin Mason [and a number of others] wrote: [snip a long thread about tracking messages through spamc/spamd] With all the talk about problems tracking spamd log entries, I'm curious why nobody has simply tried "grep spamd /var/log/maillog" and done some *very* basic sorting on the resulting outpu

Re: [SAtalk] subject line not be rewritten-SOLVED-

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 06:02, Mark Pearce wrote: > Hi > > > > > > Did I not give enough information for this? Is there anything else I > > > can add that would help to fix this? Anything else that is needed > > > please let me know. I really need to get this working. > > I had the same problem.

[SAtalk] iMS 5.2 w/SA 2.31 & Razor 2.34

Title: Message Hi all,   I'm currently trying to setup SA 2.31 with Sun ONE Messaging Server 5.2hf1.03.  I've successfully got SA running with iMS, I can check the slave debug output and see the calls to SPAMD.  It appears to be working fine, no errors, but the scores coming back are always

Re: [SAtalk] Spam submission address (for tagging)?

On Sat, 24 May 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > fre, 23.05.2003 kl. 23.43 skrev Thomas Gramstad: > > > I'm a power user at the University of Oslo (UiO). > > If you're a power user at UiO, it could well be that you're the one who > could tell us all why "pat, mons og goggins" are still running Exim >

[SAtalk] spamassasin blocking delivery of mail from qmail queue

Hi Everyone, I had messages that if they were over a certain size they were getting delayed in the qmail local queue for days on end. I then read a post from someone saying that spamassassin was the cause because it was having trouble scanning large messages. They suggested lowering the max s

Re: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Justin Mason wrote: > > The mail is getting to the list. Repeatedly. However, nobody's replying > because *we're busy* ;) You're *supposed* to be devoting every waking second to SA development. If you feel the need to eat, we can probably rig some kind of an IV or someth

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

Same here, just because I'm lazy and don't want to change my email address - used since 94 - not to mention having catch-alls for several domains, other addresses currently posted as mailtos on the web, in old deja/google archives etc. None ever submitted to a p0rn site. I also use domain specif

[SAtalk] SA Help!!! Don't Know Where to Begin

Ack! I'm trying to get SA working on my linux box running sendmail. I have installed SA to the best of my knowledge, but now I have a couple of dilemnas. First, how do I know the installation will work; are there any test scripts I can try? Secondly, how do I send my mail coming into the MTA thro

RE: [SAtalk] Untrusted relays?

At 12:21 AM 5/30/2003 -0700, Gary Funck wrote: Matt/Tony, thanks for the info. and the nudge in the direction of the documentation. I tried out the CVS copy mainly out of curiosity. Based upon subsequent discussions, it looks like if I'm not in the development loop, then I may as well stay away. No

[SAtalk] Combining 2 Bayes DB's

Is there a way to merge bayes db's together? I do not like the idea of having my two mail servers share a file system. What happens if one of them dies. So what I was thinking is that once a day (maybe more offen) I could merge the two DB's together. Louis -- - -- --- ¤¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤øø¤º

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

At 08:59 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote: Content analysis details: (5.80 points, 5 required) MSGID_CHARS_SPAM (0.2 points) Message-Id has characters indicating spam HTML_FONT_FACE_ODD (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font face is not a commonly used face HTML_80_90 (0.5 points) BODY: Message is 80

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Has anyone gotten a reply from these kinds of posts after you answer them. I think the score is like 1-6. 1 reply after we all answered, and we've had about 6 of these kinds of posts. Didn't anyone call the person? I am s tempted :) > -Original Message- > From: Brian K. West [mailto:

Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

There's something screwy with your installation. The MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE rule doesn't exist in 2.55. Dr. Ongo wrote: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 tagged_above=-999.0 required=6.3 tests=DRASTIC_REDUCED, MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE, ONCE_IN_LIFETIME, REMOVE_SUBJ X-Spam-Level: ** version 2.55 --

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Well he does want someone to contact him ASAP, should we all just send e-mail to him? On side note, sure gets agitated poor lil' fellow. -Original Message- From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 30 May 2003, K

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

>L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64 >L> encoding). >How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich >text, but it is sent clear. You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way Apple Mail does ;-) --

Re: [SAtalk] Getting spamd to start on boot.

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 10:20, Thomas Cameron wrote: > Did you use the sample script called redhat-rc-script.sh which comes with > the source? > > The top several lines look like this: > > #!/bin/sh > # > # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon > # > # chkconfig: 2345 80 30 > #

Re: [SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

Jack Gostl said: > Forwarded at the request of Ben Johnasen. Guys -- please stop. The mail is getting to the list. Repeatedly. However, nobody's replying because *we're busy* ;) The correct procedure for feature requests is to open a feature request bug in the SpamAssassin Bugzilla, http://b

Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 tagged_above=-999.0 required=6.3 tests=DRASTIC_REDUCED, MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE, ONCE_IN_LIFETIME, REMOVE_SUBJ X-Spam-Level: ** version 2.55 - Original Message - From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 5:11 PM Su

Re: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:21:05AM -0400, Maciek J. Maciak wrote: > Here's the output from the above cmd, can you shed some light on why its > trying to use /root/.spamassassin directory and files ? should i be That's where the user preferences for root live. > pointing it to a different locati

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Keoki Kalune wrote: > TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS > DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP *sigh* > Executive Vice President Typical management. The tie is just a little too tight. J

RE: [SAtalk] Untrusted relays?

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Gary Funck wrote: > Matt/Tony, thanks for the info. and the nudge in the direction of the > documentation. I tried out the CVS copy mainly out of curiosity. Based > upon subsequent discussions, it looks like if I'm not in the development > loop, then I may as well stay away. N

Re: [SAtalk] Maillog analysis

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Mark wrote: > MIMEDefang would, indeed, be an excellent place to implement this, as, on > top of spamd, it gives you a bit of extra info on the SMTP session. :) > > Come to think of it, your implementation of this idea is actually a LOT > better than my running a 'sec' post-p

[SAtalk] RE: SA List (fwd)

Forwarded at the request of Ben Johnasen. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 09:49:15 -0700 From: Ben Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SA List Ok, could you post this function request to the list. I really don't care how this request get

Re: [SAtalk] Untrusted relays?

Kai Schaetzl said: > Gary Funck wrote on Fri, 30 May 2003 00:21:26 -0700: > > > I could've used remote cvs, which I believe is mentioned elsewhere, but > > this seemed easier. I'd say if this file isn't going to be kept up to > > date as the comment indicates, then the download link should be re

Re: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?

Alex van den Bogaerdt said: > Q: Are my concerns about the logging shared by others? >1: lines aren't kept together >2: the PID might not be suitable to filter the information > Q: If so, can we agree on a standard that makes it easy to find >the information belonging to one message, i

Re: [SAtalk] Untrested relays?

Gary Funck said: > As it turns out, 192.195.190.1, is our incoming firewall mail exchanger, > which forwards to our internal mail server. Couple of questions: > > 1. Are untrusted relays incorporated into SA's scoring? not a whole lot -- it can optimise RBL lookups by figuring that out, that's

[SAtalk] Whitelist an expression?

Someone high up in my company writes email exclusively in all-caps, utters countless profanities, and has been known to use more than five consecutive exclamation points on a regular basis. That said, his emails score ridiculously high on the standard spamassassin tests. I could whitelist his

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

On Fri, 30 May 2003, Keoki Kalune wrote: > TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS > DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP > > Keoki Kalune > Executive Vice President Nice. Executive VP and (s)he can't even form a coherent sentence. I won't

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Keoki Kalune wrote: *TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS. I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP* www.rkgllc.com Uh oh... sonic.net sounds familiar. ;) [10:[EMAIL PROTECTED] host -t mx rkgllc.com rkgllc.com. mail is ha

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Ok you need to contact your ISP you twit! They are the ones that use spamassassin to filter your email... So contact them bkw -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keoki Kalune Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [

Re: [SAtalk] spamd stopped responding

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:31:27PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > 25527 ?S 0:03 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/spamd != jui ] > > This looks weird to me. jui is a user on that machine. Does it mean spamd > died when changing to that user? hmmm. that looks suspiciously like a sh if stateme

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

Hi Keoki - You should probably talk to your system administrator or your ISP, whomever handles your e-mail service. The mailing list you sent your message to is for people who use and develop SpamAssassin. There is little chance that anyone on this list has anything to do with your e-mail servic

[SAtalk] spamd stopped responding

Our spamd stopped responding today (first time ever). I'm running 2.60-cvs from two days ago, so it may be a problem with the code there. I just wait and get another copy from cvs. But what I don't understand is this line in ps: 25527 ?S 0:03 /usr/bin/perl -w /usr/bin/spamd != jui

[SAtalk] sneaky spam - new user

hello all, I am a new user of SA and let me say it is excellent! I am receiveing a small fraction of the spam that is aimed at me now. One that is sneaking through uses a pattern which I would like to add to SA but Im not sure how. Could someone could point me to documentation for building rules

[SAtalk] (no subject)

TAKE ME OFF THIS SITE, KNOW ONE KNOW WHO OR HOW I GOT THIS BUT IT IS DISRUPTING BY BUSINESS.  I WANT SOME ONE TO CONTACT ME ASAP   Keoki Kalune Executive Vice President The RK Group 408-942-8107 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.rkgllc.com    

Re: [SAtalk] Auto reply

At 08:20 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote: Hello, How do i setup an auto reply in sendmail, please help... First, look for a SendMail group. This is for spamassassin. Evan --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on

RE: [SAtalk] Attaboy

I completely agree that SA is incredible I'm not even using bayes! Here are my stats: 90% of marked spam is scored over 7 and goes into spamtrap! Not even delivered. I've had 4 FPs since Febuary! Stats per log. Totals to a month worth. -rw--- 1 root root 4.6M May 30 12:00 /var/l

Re: [SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

At 07:57 AM 05/30/2003, you wrote: Hello if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it doesnt register as spam ?? hits = 1.7 should it be recognised as spam ? What version are you on? What were the hits? Myne scored a 4.3 with just the body (not headers): X-Spam

RE: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

Hello, Maciek   Here is the line that I placed in my local.cf file for spamassassin   bayes_path /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes   So far it's working well for my site-wide Bayes   -matt From: Maciek J. Maciak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:21 AMTo: Theo Van Di

Re: [SAtalk] USAGE - Mutt Bindings

On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:03:20PM -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Max Baker wrote: > > First off, this thing KICKS ASS! > > > > Second off, Here are a couple more mutt bindings that might be useful to > > stick in USAGE for others to enjoy. (Near the X bi

Re: [SAtalk] spam-stats

DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote on Fri, 30 May 2003 13:53:33 +0200: > Sorry if you sent me such extracts already, I should hopefully be able to > read my > email soon. > No, I didn't, I wanted to ask first if you want them :-) I'm going to send an excerpt now. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, German

Re: [SAtalk] +++ /etc/mail/sa/local.cf OR /usr/share/sa +++

As for "doesn't work", that's not very useful. Have you tried "spamassassin -D --lint"? Is it using the /etc/mail/spamassassin area? Any errors from --lint? Here's the output from the above cmd, can you shed some light on why its trying to use /root/.spamassassin directory and files ? sh

Re: [SAtalk] razor 2 support

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:22:00AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: > Does spamassassin check the mail against Razor's Database or just > optionally contribute the mail it finds as SPAM to cloudmarks DB? yes, it can check the mail if you have the razor2 modules installed. -- Randomly Generated Tagli

[SAtalk] Auto reply

Hello, How do i setup an auto reply in sendmail, please help... Frank

[SAtalk] Auto reply

Hello, How do i setup an auto reply in sendmail, please help... Frank

[SAtalk] sample-spam.txt

Hello if i send myself the content of this file minus all the header stuff, it doesnt register as spam ?? hits = 1.7 should it be recognised as spam ? Dave --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on

RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local users?

Title: Message What is the default delivery file in my case?  I'm using sendmail only as a mail "router", there are no local mailboxes/accounts or "rc" files that are processed, IE .procmailrc, etc   -Jim -Original Message-From: Izquierdo, Raul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [SAtalk] Getting spamd to start on boot.

Did you use the sample script called redhat-rc-script.sh which comes with the source? The top several lines look like this: #!/bin/sh # # spamassassin This script starts and stops the spamd daemon # # chkconfig: 2345 80 30 # # description: spamd is a daemon process which uses SpamAssassin to chec

  1   2   >