On Sat, 31 May 2003, Steve Wilson wrote: > Jack Gostl wrote: > > >On Sat, 31 May 2003, Steve Wilson wrote: > > > >>My /home/$user/.procmail/rules.rc file is: > >>:0fw > >>| /usr/bin/spamc > >>:0: > >>* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes > >>SPAM > >>----------- > >>That now works only if I change line2 to /usr/bin/spamassassin. > >> > >>This isn't a terribly big system here, so I suppose I could get away > >>with that, but I'd much prefer to use spamd/spamc. > >> > >> > > > >The two obvious questions are (1) is spamd running and (2) are you sure > >that spamc is in /usr/bin and has proper permissions. > > > Well, my apologies. It appears to be working (spamd/spamc). It's just > scoring REAL low. If I forward > a SPAM I got on my regular mail server that has a SA score of 16.9 to > the new MS (same version RH and SA), > it gets a score of 6.6. Strange....
Offering you the benefit of my screwups.... Make sure the machine has DNS access and general internet access for the RBL checks. Make sure permissions on the Bayes files and directory are correct. Also make sure the files are current. If you start from scratch, you'll have to retrain. Compare the rules hits on the two machines. It might give you a clue, e.g. no BAYES results, or no RBL data. -- Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
