On Fri, 30 May 2003, Mark wrote: > MIMEDefang would, indeed, be an excellent place to implement this, as, on > top of spamd, it gives you a bit of extra info on the SMTP session. :) > > Come to think of it, your implementation of this idea is actually a LOT > better than my running a 'sec' post-process of the maillog. Because, since > you run MIMEDefang as a wrapper around the spamd process, "whiltelisting" is > now simply done within the same spamd process (and does not require an > external correction, as in my original set-up). All you basically do, is > mark the "bulkiness" (as Justin called it; good term) as suspect, and give > it a score amidst other scores. > > So, thanks for the idea! :)
FYI, MIMEDefang doesn't use any of the SpamAssassin executables. You could delete spamc, spamd, and spamassassin and still have a working MD w/ SA installation. MD calls SA's Perl libraries. Thought I'd mention that. Justin PS==> There are a couple hacks floating around that allow you to use MD with spamd so that you can put spamd on another machine. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
