On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 05:51 PM, I wrote:
> I get messages from a mailing list that test out as spam
> I know I can whitelist the mailing list.
> whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Messages are addresed TO the list, right?
>
> Is this the best solution for a list that consistantly hits 5.0?
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 06:57 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> install SA and silently drop spam traffic.
Oooo! that is clever. I like it I like it.
--
You are responsible for your rose.
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 05:23 PM, Kaitlin Duck Sherwood wrote:
> I don't even bother trying to parse to make sure it's an HTML tag: the
> only English-language word with I-M-G in it is the city Pri.m.ghar, Iowa
> -- population 950. There are a few acronyms -- Inside Macintosh Games,
> for e
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ> There were a bunch of test files distributed with TextCat.
We can probably paste some of them into an email body then I guess.
DQ> Having the GA score this would be nice. My last rule was almost a
DQ> "fiver" after the GA got done with it. :-)
It will be interesting
* Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-03T18:01-0700]:
> What we have been thinking about would be a transparent redirect of
> SMTP traffic to a mail gateway. The redirect being installed only for
> the known/repported spammers.
STARTTLS tunneled mail does not take kindly to being transpar
Today, the Horde team committed code that allows someone setting up a
Horde mail system to enable a 'Report as Spam' option that can use a
program to do the submission ...
The example I got them to put into the conf file is spamassassin -r, but
any program that can be pipe'd into should work jus
Craig R Hughes writes:
> thanks, great work. It's getting late now, and I have a big
> breakfast meeting early tomorrow, so I'll take a look at this
> sometime after noon. Is it kosher to roll this with the
> language-detection stuff and all into the SA distribution then?
> Sounds like you've g
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 05:47:51PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Have you had better luck with this patch applied? If so, kludge or not,
> I'll certainly apply it.
Yeah, it solved the deadlock problem completely. I think a big part of it
was being caused by the milter writing to spamc in 4096
On 3 May 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Actually, on second thoughts, maybe we should start to do a DB based URI
> eval rule? Having a new rule for every single URI would kill
> performance. Someone post a bug if you think that's a good idea.
Why not use the existing DNS blacklist mechanisms? Feed
> I would suggest notifying an admin person rather than silently dropping.
> Silently dropping is really bad should you ever have a false positive.
I was talking about 100% identified spammers, only filter them.
The war against these few customer has been runnig for ages, blocking
their port 25,
Hi,
in case anyone is interested: I noticed that the NetBSD package system
('pkgsrc') has updated the package mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin for SA 2.20.
ciao
Klaus
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON> Then install SA and silently drop spam traffic.
I would suggest notifying an admin person rather than silently dropping.
Silently dropping is really bad should you ever have a false positive.
ON> I think thi solution is even better than adding some penalty to all
ON> t
> Some questions I have is if anyone in a similar situation that I'm in? And if
> so, would you think such a system like the above would be useful? I'd
> appreciate any suggestions.
Well I am not ISP, but I once talked to my friend who is working at
one and has having the same problem.
What we h
Take a look at the new vpopmail integration in SA 2.20 first before
resorting to SQL. See the README.spamd-vpopmail in the spamd dir of the
2.20 distribution for details. It gives support for virtual vpopmail users.
I wrote the patch and use it daily and works great.
--
Ed.
>
> Chris,
>
> ta
Yes; and then do a diff -ur and either mail it to the list, or better, attach it
to a bugzilla ticket.
C
Chuck Wolber wrote:
CW>
CW>
CW> > Yes. Patches and/or bugzilla requests happily accepted.
CW>
CW> Excellent :-) Should I write it against the tip of the CVS tree?
CW>
CW>
CW>
Greetings, spamologists!
I spent the past four years thinking about email, including spam,
while working on a pair of books on how to overcome email overload.
Recently, I've been working on a Visual Basic plug-in for MS Outlook
(send flames off-list, please, and first note that I'm a Eudora fa
> Yes. Patches and/or bugzilla requests happily accepted.
Excellent :-) Should I write it against the tip of the CVS tree?
--
Chuck Wolber
System Administrator
AltaServ Corporation
(425)576-1202
ten.vresatla@wkcuhc"Condense facts from the vapor of nuance."
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:23:47PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
| Theo Van Dinter wrote:
|
| TVD> > Note that MAIL FROM: is wholly different from From: and most end users
| TVD> > never see the contents of the MAIL FROM:.
| TVD>
| TVD> Note: Most MUAs will use the From: header to be the envelope
Craig R Hughes wrote:
> correctly but I guess I didn't. Could you file a bugzilla ticket
Bug #276
ciao
Klaus
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. E
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:23:47PM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> ...and hope the place that gets your email address doesn't reset all their
> users' mail preferences to "opted in" -- cf Yahoo and eBay in recent months. I
> also used to always turn off the "opt in" checkbox on everything, but *st
Yes. Patches and/or bugzilla requests happily accepted.
C
Chuck Wolber wrote:
CW> > Running spamd? Did you restart it after changing local.cf?
CW>
CW> Would it not be beneficial fpr spamd to do a timestamp check on the conf
CW> files so the admin does not have to worry about remembering to re
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
TVD> > Note that MAIL FROM: is wholly different from From: and most end users
TVD> > never see the contents of the MAIL FROM:.
TVD>
TVD> Note: Most MUAs will use the From: header to be the envelope FROM as well.
Not sure I've ever seen a MUA other than 'telnet' which allow
OK, that's embarassing... I though we tried that earlier.
Evidently not!
As for the reliability, let me pass a few million messages
through the system and I'll let you know. As of today, we are still testing. I
should be able to answer this by next week.>>> Ross Vandegrift
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
> I had a problem with it where it would deadlock with the spamc process if
> the message was over 250k (or whatever the max size for spamc/spamd). I
> ended up solving it by adding a read() loop to spamc to flush the read
> buffer so that the milter would be ready for the response. It's probabl
That may just be what's causing it - thanks!
Dave Strickler CEODWS - "The GroupWise Integration Experts"
Boston * Austin * Belgium * Denmark http://www.emailsolutions.com
(800) 999-5412 x10>>> Daniel Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/3/2002 4:38:37 PM >>>On Fri,
May 03, 2002 at 04:17:43PM -040
Can't apply the patch until tomorrow, but will try it then and
ley you (and the list) know how it works.
Dave Strickler CEODWS - "The GroupWise Integration
Experts" Boston * Austin * Belgium * Denmark http://www.emailsolutions.com
(800) 999-5412 x10>>> Ross Vandegrift
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Running spamd? Did you restart it after changing local.cf?
Would it not be beneficial fpr spamd to do a timestamp check on the conf
files so the admin does not have to worry about remembering to restart it?
-Chuck
--
Chuck Wolber
System Administrator
AltaServ Corporation
(425)576-1202
ten
On 3 May 2002, Ken Causey wrote:
> Thanks again Ed. I had to modify the script slightly to get it to work
> with my procmail (procmail v3.22 2001/09/10):
>
> # Test for nospamcheck
> :0
> * ? test -f $HOME/.nospamcheck
> {
> #if nospamcheck exists then deliver normally
> :0:
> $ORGMAIL
>
Title: Question about SA and QMail-Scanner..
I have Qmail running, I have SpamAssassin installed and the Daemon Started, I have Qmail-scanner installed and running, but I can't seem to get the scanner to use SpamAssassin!
When I use the ./configure command from Qmail-Scanner I get an error st
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:48:03PM -0500, dman wrote:
> Depends on how brain-damaged the software is in the first place. Some
> software can easily be setup to switch settings dynamically.
>
> Alternatively an ssh tunnel can be used to get inside the corp.
> network and pretend that the dialup l
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:43:27PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
|
|
| > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:09:53AM -0400, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
| > wrote: | This question is not SA specific but just a general email
| > sysadmin type | question: What is an effective way to monitor my own
| > dialup cust
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:17:43PM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On a related note, is spamass-milter at all reliable for you? I have
> huge amounts of problems with it spinning off a ridiculous number of
> sub-processess (spamass-milter and spamc) that never return. I'm
> considering figuring
It does list the port -- a unix socket in /var/local/spamass-sock
Perhaps the user you're running as doesn't have the right permissions on that
C
Dave Strickler wrote:
DS> A friend I just set up SA and it was working fine with the deamons.
DS> After rebooting, the spamass-milter wouldn't load,
>
> Running spamd? Did you restart it after changing local.cf?
Ahh, no I didn't. Thought it got read for each message. Guess that seems
silly now.
--
You are responsible for your rose.
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is lo
Chris,
take a look at storing the userprefs in a SQL database instead of as files.
Search the mailing list archives for vpopmail or virtuser and you'll probably
find lots of info.
C
Christopher Kunz wrote:
CK> Hey there,
CK>
CK> since yesterday, I'm a happy SpamAssassin user (thanks to Sascha
gprintf is a Mandrake-ism I think. Redhat just uses echo instead. If you edit
the /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin script and replace the gprints with echos (or
you can just comment them out if you don't care about the printing of startup
info).
C
Gunnar Lieb wrote:
GL> Hi,
GL>
GL> I'm new to sp
It seems to me that it would be useful to have a single repository of
false negatives (i.e., stuff that slipped past SA) with some sort of
automated process to crunch the messages to produce fodder for rules
updates.
This would be most useful for body tests, since people would be using
all so
I don't think this is the answer -- the binary difference between 2.9 and 3.0 is
pretty large, and in any case, SA's rounding can tell the difference between
these. This might be the problem if it were 2. versus 3.0 but not for a .1
difference.
C
dman wrote:
d> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:3
Running spamd? Did you restart it after changing local.cf?
C
LuKreme wrote:
L> OK, so I decided to drop the value of X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC to 2.9 (from 3.0)
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 04:08:09PM -0400, Dave Strickler wrote:
> A friend I just set up SA and it was working fine with the deamons.
> After rebooting, the spamass-milter wouldn't load, even by hand. The
> error it give is (from the log):
>
> May 3 15:47:58 scrubber su(pam_unix)[1030]: session
Looks like you're using cyrus for delivery. I do this:
# process through spamassassin before here
:0
| $DELIVER -e -q $USER
and then I just create sieve scripts to handle which mailbox messages end up in,
rather than trying to deliver the messages directly there using -m
C
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Derek Broughton wrote:
DB> From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DB> > they used to improve rules or just added the spam corpus?
DB>
DB> Aren't the two things synonymous? ;-) I'm sure that that is, at least, the
DB> intention.
The sightings stuff mostly does not currently end
A friend I just set up SA and it was working fine
with the deamons. After rebooting, the spamass-milter wouldn't load, even by
hand. The error it give is (from the log):
May 3 15:47:58 scrubber su(pam_unix)[1030]:
session opened for user root by awaltman(uid=501)May 3 15:48:08
scrubber s
Hmm, looks like a bug. I'm surprised; I would have thought I'd implemented that
correctly but I guess I didn't. Could you file a bugzilla ticket please Klaus
at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
Thanks,
C
Klaus Heinz wrote:
KH> Hi,
KH>
KH> I was experimenting with spamc/spamd but noticed th
Doug Crompton wrote:
DC> This is really spam - should we not have something that matches credit
DC> card debt? Submitted to razor.
I guess I need to bump spam-phrase re-enablement up in the priority list. That
would probably have flagged this message.
C
__
CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
CEH> This question is not SA specific but just a general email sysadmin type
CEH> question: What is an effective way to monitor my own dialup customers to
CEH> see if any are abusing their email privilege by sending out spam? I am
CEH> using qmail. Somehow m
Richie Laager wrote:
RL> On a related note, how can one send his spam collection to be
RL> included in the spam corpus?
Currently there are bandwidth/storage issues impinging on doing what I'd like to
in this arena. I do have a couple feeds from other people's spamtraps which
populate the corpu
Honestly, nothing much most of the time. But the messages are archived, and
provide a resource which people can go to if necessary. Occasionally I browse
through and see if there's anything there which jumps out at me. Don't tell
anyone, but the list is mostly there so that people don't bombard
Christopher Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hey there,
>
> since yesterday, I'm a happy SpamAssassin user (thanks to Sascha Schumann,
> who might even read this list, too) on my VPopMail setup. I'm now
> investigating the possibility of setting SA as the default spam blocking
> tool for all our
www.spamassassin.org is probably better, since that will stay with the project
even if taint.org is no longer where the site is actually located.
C
Klaus Heinz wrote:
KH> Hi,
KH>
KH> which is the official site name for SA that should be used?
KH> Both www.spamassassin.org and spamassassin.taint
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:09:53AM -0400, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> wrote: | This question is not SA specific but just a general email
> sysadmin type | question: What is an effective way to monitor my own
> dialup customers to | see if any are abusing their email privilege by
> sending
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS> Personally I think the implementation of whitelisting is broken - if
MS> it's whitelisted or blacklisted we should be scanning period. But our
MS> white/blacklisting is implemented separately here, so you're unlikely to
MS> see a fix coming direct from me, I'm afraid (unl
dman wrote:
d> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:24:43AM +0100, Darren Coleman wrote:
d> | Yes, it does check for PGP signed messages, which is good.
d> |
d> | But digitally signed messages (like yours and mine), i.e those that
d> | require the person to buy a digital id, go through a verification
d> |
Derek Broughton wrote:
DB> make sense to be rounding a result of 4.55 or even 4.95 up to 5 (though to
DB> be pedantic, you can't round 4.9 _down_ to 4.9 - that's truncation
Round (v): to make round, to convert into something round
Round (n): A low-precision number
So why exactly can't you r
> You could add an entry to the main procmailrc that checks for the
> existence of a certain file called "nospamcheck" (or something like
> that). IF the file exists in the users dir then don't run spamc
> otherwise run spamc. Then put "nospamcheck" in each of the user's dir
> that do not want
Nathan Neulinger wrote:
NN> Was this changed recently? Cause it most definately did not work for me
I definitely think there's something weird going on in the short-circuit code.
I'll take a look at it and it'll probably be pretty clear what's up.
C
___
Darren,
can you send me such a signed message? There are probably several hundred
digital-message-signing technologies out there, and they probably all have
slightly different ways of doing the signing, etc. I don't know if you're using
S/MIME or something. If you send a message, I'll find a p
Hey there,
since yesterday, I'm a happy SpamAssassin user (thanks to Sascha Schumann,
who might even read this list, too) on my VPopMail setup. I'm now
investigating the possibility of setting SA as the default spam blocking
tool for all our domain customers. Unfortunately, vpopmail uses virtual
Well, AWL can't really run first. It more or less *has* to run last. But
there's no reason it can't run last, after the early-terminate has terminated:
while(early-terminate condition not met)
{
step through some rules
}
check awl here
as opposed to treating AWL as just another rule.
C
Mat
> This is really spam - should we not have something that matches credit
> card debt? Submitted to razor.
Not to mention the key phrase "cut [your] interest rate"
--
You are responsible for your rose.
___
Have big pipes? SourceFo
Hi,
I'm new to spamassassin and also new to linux. We just installed
CommunigatePro on Redhat 7.2
I have downloaded the RPM's for Spamassassin. If I go in the package manager
everything seems right, but if I try to start it the sript is complaining
that gprintf is an undefined function? So what
> This question is not SA specific but just a general email sysadmin type
> question: What is an effective way to monitor my own dialup customers
> to see if any are abusing their email privilege by sending out spam? I
> am using qmail. Somehow monitor the volume that each local IP is
> sendin
Thanks again Ed. I had to modify the script slightly to get it to work
with my procmail (procmail v3.22 2001/09/10):
# Test for nospamcheck
:0
* ? test -f $HOME/.nospamcheck
{
#if nospamcheck exists then deliver normally
:0:
$ORGMAIL
}
#Filter message thru SA
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc -u $LO
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:32:03PM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
| OK, so I decided to drop the value of X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC to 2.9 (from 3.0)
| X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.0 required=5.0
| SPAM: Hit! (3.0 points) DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Spam Source
| puzzled.
Welcome to binary floating point :-). The
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS> I'd be pretty unpopular if I gave them away (I already have to be pretty
MS> careful about my contributions - I have some killer new spam stuff here,
MS> but unfortunately I'm not really allowed to talk about it - if I did it
MS> would be trivial for you to implement, but
OK, so I decided to drop the value of X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC to 2.9 (from 3.0)
so I made changes to the existing local.cf file:
% cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
# Add your own customisations to this file. See 'man
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf'# for details of what can be tweaked.
#
score X_OSIRU_SPA
From: "Viraj Alankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Now by being able to see this traffic, we can do some interesting things.
If
> anyone has played with dsniff, there are 2 tools in that package that come
to
> mind: mailsnarf and tcpkill :). For those that do not know, mailsnarf
> basically dumps out S
Hello,
We are a network service provider and over time I have seen the customers that
we provide network connectivity to many times generate alot of spam from their
network.
Many times the business rationale of this is basically it is more profitable
to the company to keep these customers. Many
These spam messages are coming from someone hosted by chinanet,
chinanet.cn.net using the ip address of 61.129.81.52, which searching google
is a commonly used IP address for spam mailings. In fact this same message
is being sent with a variety of forged from/return-path addresses. However
as far
I have a account where the only thing I recieve is SPAM. So I'd like to set it up to
report it with spamassassin.
I've tried:
:0 H
* ^Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0 fw
| spamassassin -r
:0
| formail -I "From " -s $DELIVER -m user.spam.spam
}
but the mail doesn't get delived with
Thank you, this looks like a possible solution!
Ken
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 11:12, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> >
> >
> > You could add an entry to the main procmailrc that checks for the
> > existence
> > of a certain file called "nospamcheck" (or something like that). IF the
> > file e
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:09:53AM -0400, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
| This question is not SA specific but just a general email sysadmin type
| question: What is an effective way to monitor my own dialup customers to
| see if any are abusing their email privilege by sending out spam? I
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:52:39AM -0600, Andrew Hoying wrote:
| I'm getting flooded with messages from postmaster accounts about spam coming
| from us. When you look at the header it is obviously coming from Asia, but
| they are using our company domain name in the from and return-path
| addresse
From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > These should goto spamassassin-sightings, not spamassassin-talk (unless
> > you think there's a discussion in store for this spam.)
>
> What exactly happens to the emails that are sent to
spamassassin-sightings?
> I have sent alot of
>
>
> You could add an entry to the main procmailrc that checks for the
> existence
> of a certain file called "nospamcheck" (or something like that). IF the
> file exists in the users dir then don't run spamc otherwise run
> spamc. Then
> put "nospamcheck" in each of the user's dir that do not
You could add an entry to the main procmailrc that checks for the existence
of a certain file called "nospamcheck" (or something like that). IF the
file exists in the users dir then don't run spamc otherwise run spamc. Then
put "nospamcheck" in each of the user's dir that do not want SA. I do th
I'm getting flooded with messages from postmaster accounts about spam coming
from us. When you look at the header it is obviously coming from Asia, but
they are using our company domain name in the from and return-path
addresses. The spam is even about equities, we deal in commodities and
equity t
Hi,
I was experimenting with spamc/spamd but noticed the following also
with spamassassin -P:
$ perl ./check_whitelist | grep bangura
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -> 107.4 (107.4/1)
$ spamassassin -R < /tmp/bangura
SpamAssassin auto-whitelist: removing address: [EMAIL PROTEC
I need some SA specific procmail help and I'm hoping someone on the list
has already run into this.
I've recently setup SA for a small ISP (about 1000+ mailboxes). 99%
percent of their customers are happy, there are a couple that are
offended that their email is being "modified".
Can I continue
This is really spam - should we not have something that matches credit
card debt? Submitted to razor.
Doug
-- Forwarded message --
Received: from outmta027.topica.com (outmta027.topica.com [64.125.140.180])
by marconi.crompton.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id g43EeoG0797
Hi Henry - I have it working now. I'm using a Cobalt Qube 3 (which runs
some Linux variant, RH I believe).
Just needed to setup procmail correctly, and fix up some stuff in smrsh.
It's working great now!
At 02:55 AM 5/3/2002 -0700, Henry Kwan wrote:
> > My .foward is setup exactly as the READM
This question is not SA specific but just a general email sysadmin type
question: What is an effective way to monitor my own dialup customers to
see if any are abusing their email privilege by sending out spam? I am
using qmail. Somehow monitor the volume that each local IP is sending? Just
cur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 03 May 2002 10:00 am, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
wrote:
> What exactly happens to the emails that are sent to
> spamassassin-sightings? I have sent alot of them but just
> wonder if anything is done with them. Are they used to
> improve
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS> Well we don't care if there's multiply nested stuff - because anything
MS> deeper than the first level is just an attachment (though it does store
MS> attachments, with their mime type, so you can parse them if you want
MS> to).
Yes, we do care. I've seen examples of mu
Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> MS> Well we don't care if there's multiply nested stuff - because anything
> MS> deeper than the first level is just an attachment (though it does store
> MS> attachments, with their mime type, so you can parse them if you want
> MS> to).
>
> Yes,
>
> These should goto spamassassin-sightings, not spamassassin-talk (unless
> you think there's a discussion in store for this spam.)
>
What exactly happens to the emails that are sent to spamassassin-sightings?
I have sent alot of them but just wonder if anything is done with them. Are
they use
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS> I think the reason my stuff would work quite well is it's specifically
MS> designed to make it easy to get the known body text from the document,
MS> in the same way that an email client would. The MIME::* stuff seems more
MS> generic to me, so you'd have to code that stu
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> SpamAssassin, at least, should be scanning inline parts no matter
> their depth in the hierarchy. Attachment parts probably only want
> scanning when they are the only, or first, part in a message.
Given a multipart/related part, any part that is refer
I want to apologize to everyone for my fumble here. I will be more
careful in the future.
Ken
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 09:25, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:20:34AM -0500, Ken Causey wrote:
> > Not much to filter here, I reported it to razor as well as AOL.
>
> These should g
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:20:34AM -0500, Ken Causey wrote:
> Not much to filter here, I reported it to razor as well as AOL.
These should goto spamassassin-sightings, not spamassassin-talk (unless
you think there's a discussion in store for this spam.)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Working a
Hi,
which is the official site name for SA that should be used?
Both www.spamassassin.org and spamassassin.taint.org work and point to
the same address.
ciao
Klaus
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirro
Not much to filter here, I reported it to razor as well as AOL.
--- Begin Message ---
Check out the most exclusive sex guide site on the net, for men and women! http://pleasurelover.subverter.net";>Click here!
--- End Message ---
Nathan Neulinger wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 19:31, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
>>
>>>The biggest problem with -S is due to the ordering of the rule checks.
>>>If all of the negative rules (or at least the _large_ negative rules)
>>>were processed first, it would probably
On Fri, 3 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:54:25PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> | On Thu, 2 May 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> | > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:35:58PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> | >
> | > I wonder if this particular spammer has ways around this.
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:24:43AM +0100, Darren Coleman wrote:
| Yes, it does check for PGP signed messages, which is good.
|
| But digitally signed messages (like yours and mine), i.e those that
| require the person to buy a digital id, go through a verification
| procedure etc, are not given a
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:54:25PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
| On Thu, 2 May 2002, Duncan Findlay wrote:
| > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:35:58PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
| >
| > I wonder if this particular spammer has ways around this...
|
| Duh. :)
He's probably hoping to get a one-up o
Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 19:31, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
> > The biggest problem with -S is due to the ordering of the rule checks.
> > If all of the negative rules (or at least the _large_ negative rules)
> > were processed first, it would probably be ok
>
> All the large
Craig wrote:
> Well, I think that better than comparing the rounded number, we should
> instead compare the real numbers, and just round down instead.
> So 4.9 would be
> displayed as 4.9 not 5.0 -- it's less mathematically correct, but makes it
> clearer why 5.0 < 5.0 sometimes.
Which is fi
On 03 May 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 12:31, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> >> Cool. Does it correctly handle cases such as MIME digest messages
>> >> containing nested multipart/related and multipart/alternative
>> >> content?
>> >
>> > Well we don't care if there's multiply nes
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 12:31, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> >> Cool. Does it correctly handle cases such as MIME digest messages
> >> containing nested multipart/related and multipart/alternative
> >> content?
> >
> > Well we don't care if there's multiply nested stuff - because anything
> > deeper than
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
