Nathan Neulinger wrote: > Matt Sergeant wrote: > >>On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 19:31, Neulinger, Nathan wrote: >> >>>The biggest problem with -S is due to the ordering of the rule checks. >>>If all of the negative rules (or at least the _large_ negative rules) >>>were processed first, it would probably be ok >> >>All the large negative rules *are* processed first, albeit still split >>into "header", "body", "full body", and "other" rules first. > > Was this changed recently?
No, that's how it was implemented. > Cause it most definately did not work for me > when I did a user preference to add a whitelist entry for a known spam > source. You'll note that I didn't mention whitelisting ;-) That sort of thing happens after the other stuff, and so it is broken in that sense. Personally I think the implementation of whitelisting is broken - if it's whitelisted or blacklisted we should be scanning period. But our white/blacklisting is implemented separately here, so you're unlikely to see a fix coming direct from me, I'm afraid (unless it drives me nuts enough to implement at home, but that seems unlikely since I don't deal with that much traffic). Matt. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
