On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 12:31, Daniel Pittman wrote: > >> Cool. Does it correctly handle cases such as MIME digest messages > >> containing nested multipart/related and multipart/alternative > >> content? > > > > Well we don't care if there's multiply nested stuff - because anything > > deeper than the first level is just an attachment > > Bzzzt. Wrong. That, there, is the sort of thinking that results in quite > a number of broken MUA implementations.
Perhaps you could enlighten me then? At the moment it parses recursively until it either finds the first text/* parts and creates body sections out of those, and then makes attachments from the rest, all following the MIME rfcs. Now you've got me wondering whether it does the right thing or not. Matt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
