dman wrote: d> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:24:43AM +0100, Darren Coleman wrote: d> | Yes, it does check for PGP signed messages, which is good. d> | d> | But digitally signed messages (like yours and mine), i.e those that d> | require the person to buy a digital id, go through a verification d> | procedure etc, are not given any score - negative or positive. It just d> | seemed to me that if someone possesses a digital id and uses it when d> | sending an email, that should surely be worth some kind of negative d> | value even if it isn't much. d> d> In that case I guess I don't know what you're referring to. I've d> never seen a signed message that wasn't gpg/pgp. (and that rule d> doesn't seem to be triggering for some reason)
Yes, strange. Don't know why it's not triggering -- looks like it should be. C _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
