* Marc Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 08:12:48PM -0800, Mike Erickson wrote:
> > A few times, I've been going through old mail in one of my mailboxes and
> > noticed a mail with no subject. Opening it up reveals an entire email
> > message, headers and all, in the body
* Baurjan Ismagulov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 09. 2001 18:57]:
> > Can some kind soul point me to the docs I need to read to figure out why
> > I see things like this:
> >
> > \251 allie\260M
> >
> > In some messages? \260 is the degree symbol and \251 is the copyright
> > symbol, I think.
>
>
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:40:38PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> % Just put together a macro that looks something like this:
> %
> % macro index \Cf "[EMAIL PROTECTED]y"
> % macro pager \Cf "[EMAIL PROTECTED]y"
>
> No, no, no!
>
> % This will bounce the message to that address w
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:33:03PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> % who uses email. And we need to devise a way so that when we quote email,
> % we quote it with _their_ quote character, not ours. That way we know who
> % wrote it, not who's replying to it ;)
>
> No, no, no... One
Can someone who uses a macro to access abook from within mutt offer a
sample macro for that purpose?
aloha (and TIA),
dave
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 09:40:04PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> I haven't done this before and didn't test it, but something like
> :0 hf:
> * ^TOcstex
> | grep -v '^Reply-To:'
>
> should do what you want. Look in "man procmailrc" for filter. You need
> of course a second recipe to deliver t
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > and finally posited> wrote it, not who's replying to it ;)
> > ^^^ This is more than one character ;)
>
> Not if you encode it properly. After all, with nearly six billion
> people on the planet and many of them with multiple persona
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:58:09PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
...
% >
% > macro index B "[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\n" "Forward spam to spamcop"
% >
% p.s. This is tested and does work :)
% I use it to forward mail to my work address.
Ah, I get it.
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:28:10PM -0500, Brian Clark wrote:
>
> Can some kind soul point me to the docs I need to read to figure out why
> I see things like this:
>
> \251 allie\260M
>
> In some messages? \260 is the degree symbol and \251 is the copyright
> symbol, I think.
Seems th
Peter --
I see that you've figured out how to track how much spam you get...
...and then Peter Jay Salzman said...
%
% hi there,
%
% how can i bind an unused key to:
%
% 1. turn on all headers
% 2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have $mime_forward and $forward_decode set so that me
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Benjamin Michotte wrote:
> Is it possible to set something like
>
> :0:
> * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org
> * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be
> linux
Seems that this will match only messages sent to both lists, which is
probably not wha
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:25:03PM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel --
>
> ...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
> %
> % On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, David T-G
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> % > % subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So if a
>
Rob, et al --
...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman (dis)graced my inbox
with:
% > hi there,
%
% Hello!
And the same back to you.
%
% > 1. turn on all headers
%
% This is bound to 'h' by default.
Yes, but he probably means f
Cliff, et al --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
% > hi there,
% >
% > how can i bind an unused key to:
% >
% > 1. turn on all headers
% > 2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%
% macro index B "[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n
Sam, et al --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
%
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > To set my comments apart from others' I started using %_ (the
...
% > within a few years all manner of quoting (most commonly : :_ |
% > |_ $ but occasionally % and %_ just like me) abounded.
%
% T
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:22:00AM +0100, Benjamin Michotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> hello,
>
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Hi,
> I benefit of this off-topic to ask a little question too.
> Actually, I have this
>
> :0:
> * ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org
>
Rob --
...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:12:39PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
% >
% > Fair enough. Here ya go (with apologies to those who have seen this
% > recently :-)
% >
% > It all started back in the Usenet news days of 1989 and 1990, be
Cliff, et al --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:53:27PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:12:39PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
% > > % > Do you want my semi-canned answer, or should I just keep quiet on this
% > > % >
Rob --
...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 09:01:55PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson (dis)graced my inbox with:
% > >
% > Rob first said> Great, now all we need is a unique mail quote character for
everybody
% > and then continued with> who uses email. And we need to devi
Can some kind soul point me to the docs I need to read to figure out why
I see things like this:
\251 allie\260M
In some messages? \260 is the degree symbol and \251 is the copyright
symbol, I think.
I do not think this is a Mutt problem, but I have no idea where to begin
to look, or who to a
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:54:37PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% > %
% > % > It all started back in the Usenet news days of 1989 and 1990, before
...
% > % Errm, as explanations go, this isn't one that mak
Daniel --
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > % subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So if a
% >
% > This I also understand -- but it seems to be too over-the-top. I've been
...
%
% Th
hello,
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Hi,
I benefit of this off-topic to ask a little question too.
Actually, I have this
:0:
* ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.linuxbe\.org
linux
:0:
* ^(To|Cc).*linux@lists\.unixtech\.be
linux
Is it possible to set something like
:0:
* ^(To|Cc
Ok. Just after I sent that mail I somehow got the feeling I had made
a fool out of myself. And yes, I re-read the procmailrc man page and
found out what the 'h' flag is for. Well, that's me, always trying to
be smart. At least this time I learned something :)
--
Johan Andersson <[EMAIL PROT
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001, Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't done this before and didn't test it, but something like
> :0 hf:
> * ^TOcstex
> | grep -v '^Reply-To:'
>
> should do what you want. Look in "man procmailrc" for filter. You need
> of course a second recipe to deliver th
Hello,
thanks all for your suggestions.
I hadn't used procmail before, so I've read some manuals. Using the
default spool mailbox, .forward and procmail recipe like
:0 w: $DEFAULT.lock
* ^mailing-list: .*yahoogroups
* ^content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
| formail -i "Content-Type: text/
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To set my comments apart from others' I started using %_ (the
> common notation for a trailing space, just like the From_
> header). I had, IIRC, already seen a few folks using | and
> within a few years all manner of quoting (most commonly : :_ |
> |_ $ b
On Sun 09-Dec-2001 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to
> the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask
> procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it
> would run a message through grep -v '
On Sun, Dec 9, 2001, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> > Okay, I read this and am still confused about something. I understand
> > about the '?' and '*', but why the multiple '?'s?
>
> A series of referenced messages that don't exist.
Oh, the References: header. Gotcha. :)
Looking forward to the new
* Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar
> with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very
> simple recipe in my .procmailrc:
>
> :0:
> * ^TOcstex
> listy
>
> However, emails in this list
Hi Volker,
* Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12/09/01 20:40]:
> David T-G wrote:
> >
> > I see the new PATCHES file and its use in the ChangeLog. Yay :-)
> Apropos the PATCHES file:
> I just wanted to apply the patch-1.3.24.vvv.initials patch mentioned a
> few postings above (the only other
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman (dis)graced my inbox with:
> i just realized that running my script that keeps track of spam/day can be
> done pretty easily using procmail -- i forward the spam with mutt.
>
> spamcop sends a reply, and i can catch the reply with procma
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:17:02PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Thomas, et al --
> ...and then Thomas Dickey said...
> % On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:54:35PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % > One thing you might do is to tell your editor to wrap your lines at 72
> % > characters or so...
> % that's what ed
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar
> with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very
> simple recipe in my .procmailrc:
>
> :0:
> * ^TOcstex
>
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:06:00 -0200, Jose Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> Hello.
> I am using mutt-1.2.5i with support for reading news via NNTP (patch
> http://mutt.kiev.ua/download/mutt-1.2.5/patch-1.2.5.vvv.nntp.gz).
> The news server is my own box (localhost), which has installed
> leafnode to fetch
Hi,
sorry for OT question, but I think, for anybody really familiar
with procmail it will be only mild distraction. I have this very
simple recipe in my .procmailrc:
:0:
* ^TOcstex
listy
However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to
the list. Could it
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 09:14:50PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > > 2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > macro index B "[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\n" "Forward spam to spamcop"
> >
> p.s. This is tested and does work :)
> I use it to forward mail to my work address.
>
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 09:01:55PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > > I've simply kept it since then, and it's relatively unique and still
> > > recognizable.
> >
> Rob first said> Great, now all we need is a unique mail quote character for everybody
> and then continued with
thanks everyone.
i just realized that running my script that keeps track of spam/day can be
done pretty easily using procmail -- i forward the spam with mutt.
spamcop sends a reply, and i can catch the reply with procmail and run the
external script.
thanks for filling in the missing piece! :)
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 07:11:40PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
> It looks like I haven't made myself very clear. My point is that even
> if the Content-Type is set `correctly' to Windows-1252, there are
> still some characters that appear as question marks but should (in my
> opinion) rather be convert
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:58:09PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > how can i bind an unused key to:
> >
> > 1. turn on all headers
> > 2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> macro index B "[EMAIL PRO
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% > It all started back in the Usenet news days of 1989 and 1990, before
...
% > track of who said what when. To set my comments apart from others'
% > I started using %_ (the common notation for a trailing space, just
% > I've simply kept it
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman (dis)graced my inbox with:
> hi there,
Hello!
> 1. turn on all headers
This is bound to 'h' by default.
> 2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just put together a macro that looks something like this:
macro index \Cf "[EMAIL PR
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:53:27PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:12:39PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > % > Do you want my semi-canned answer, or should I just keep quiet on this
> > % > one? :-)/2
> > %
> > % I want your answer, so I may decide on
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:54:37PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Cliff --
>
> ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
> %
> % > It all started back in the Usenet news days of 1989 and 1990, before
> ...
> % > track of who said what when. To set my comments apart from others'
> % > I started using %_ (t
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:45:10AM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> hi there,
>
> how can i bind an unused key to:
>
> 1. turn on all headers
> 2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
macro index B "[EMAIL PROTECTED]\n\n" "Forward spam to spamcop"
--
Regards
Cliff
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:50:44PM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> % subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So if a
>
> This I also understand -- but it seems to be too over-the-top. I've been
> known to clear out everything except a final useful message deep in
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:12:39PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> % > Do you want my semi-canned answer, or should I just keep quiet on this
> % > one? :-)/2
> %
> % I want your answer, so I may decide on a suitable punishment :)
>
> Fair enough. Here ya go (with apologies to tho
Jesper --
...and then Jesper Holmberg said...
%
% David,
%
% Thank you for your explanation.
Sure thing!
%
% * On Sun Dec 09, David T-G wrote:
% % I've simply kept it since then, and it's relatively unique and still
% % recognizable.
%
% So the easiest way to make you stop doing it would b
Daniel, et al --
First, I vaguely recall your mention of further improved threading code
on the way. If my questions will all be answered in the Next Coming (er,
Coding :-) then please let me know and otherwise ignore this.
...and then Daniel Eisenbud said...
%
% On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:46:
hi there,
how can i bind an unused key to:
1. turn on all headers
2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. run a script i wrote that keeps track of how much spam i get in a day
thanks!
pete
--
** Please don't send me html email **
PGP Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E
David T-G wrote:
>
> I see the new PATCHES file and its use in the ChangeLog. Yay :-)
Apropos the PATCHES file:
I just wanted to apply the patch-1.3.24.vvv.initials patch mentioned a
few postings above (the only other patch I use in addition is
patch-1.3.24.vvv.nntp). In both cases -p1 is the
David,
Thank you for your explanation.
* On Sun Dec 09, David T-G wrote:
% I've simply kept it since then, and it's relatively unique and still
% recognizable.
So the easiest way to make you stop doing it would be to imitate you? ;-)
Jesper
--
Jesper Holmberg|"But how
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 06:08:50PM -0500, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> > Here's the deal: the asterisk means that the message was attached by
> > subject. The question mark denotes a missing reference. So if a
> > message has an in-repl
>
> Fair enough. Here ya go (with apologies to those who have seen this
> recently :-)
>
> It all started back in the Usenet news days of 1989 and 1990, before
> Linux had hit the scene (ca 1991, IIRC) and when the web was still a gleam
> in Tim's eye (ca 1991, as I was corrected the last time
Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
%
% I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
I see the new PATCHES file and its use in the ChangeLog. Yay :-)
One thing that I note is that, unless I'm confused (not out of the
question by any means), the patches will be list
Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Dickey said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:54:35PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% > One thing you might do is to tell your editor to wrap your lines at 72
% > characters or so...
%
% that's what editors are for (mutt-users seems to have a lot of vim-users,
Rob --
...and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:55:35PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
% > % quoting character. Please give me (us) your semi-canned answer. I am
% > % seriously curious.
% >
% > Stay tuned.
%
% Tell us! Tell us! ;)
Not in this thread,
Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Hurst said...
%
% * David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
%
% > ...and then Thomas Hurst said...
% > > Seriously, what's so wrong with '> ' that it isn't acceptable for
% > > everyone? :)
% >
% > Do you want my semi-canned answer, or should I just keep quiet o
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:54:35PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> One thing you might do is to tell your editor to wrap your lines at 72
> characters or so...
that's what editors are for (mutt-users seems to have a lot of vim-users,
though of course I use vile - either way it's just a keystroke to r
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:55:35PM -0500, David T-G (dis)graced my inbox with:
> % quoting character. Please give me (us) your semi-canned answer. I am
> % seriously curious.
>
> Stay tuned.
Tell us! Tell us! ;)
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Microsoft - because God hates us.
msg
Jesper --
...and then Jesper Holmberg said...
%
% * On Sun Dec 09, David T-G wrote:
% > % Seriously, what's so wrong with '> ' that it isn't acceptable for
% > % everyone? :)
% >
% > Do you want my semi-canned answer, or should I just keep quiet on this
% > one? :-)/2
%
% OK, I'll bite, becaus
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 12:37:12PM -0600, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> I have a Wy30+ serial terminal that is currently sitting in my living room.
> It is currently connected to my workstation in my room, which in turn is
> connected to my mail server in my basement via Cat-5. I would like to be
> a
Skylar --
One thing you might do is to tell your editor to wrap your lines at 72
characters or so...
...and then Skylar Thompson said...
%
% I have a Wy30+ serial terminal that is currently sitting in my living room. It is
currently connected to my workstation in my room, which in turn is conn
* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ...and then Thomas Hurst said...
> > Seriously, what's so wrong with '> ' that it isn't acceptable for
> > everyone? :)
>
> Do you want my semi-canned answer, or should I just keep quiet on this
> one? :-)/2
I want your answer, so I may decide on a suitab
Slava --
...and then Slava Pechenin said...
%
% Hello Mutt Users,
Hi!
%
% Could you give me directions how to organize address book
% working with Mutt? How do you handle this task?
The address book in mutt is simply a file containing aliases; it could
even be your muttrc file. What many f
* On Sun Dec 09, David T-G wrote:
> % Seriously, what's so wrong with '> ' that it isn't acceptable for
> % everyone? :)
>
> Do you want my semi-canned answer, or should I just keep quiet on this
> one? :-)/2
OK, I'll bite, because I've been wondering about your unorthodox choice of
quoting char
I have a Wy30+ serial terminal that is currently sitting in my living room. It is
currently connected to my workstation in my room, which in turn is connected to my
mail server in my basement via Cat-5. I would like to be able to use mutt using the
serial terminal, so I don't have to get up to
Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Hurst said...
%
% * Slava Pechenin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
%
% > I am trying to make Mutt quote my replies in the following "smart"
% > way: if original email is from "Tom Buddy" then quote string must be
% > "TB> ".
...
% Seriously, what's so wrong with '
* Slava Pechenin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am trying to make Mutt quote my replies in the following "smart"
> way: if original email is from "Tom Buddy" then quote string must be
> "TB> ".
The problem with this sort of thing is some users like to use '>TB', so you end up
with crap like:
>
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:13:22PM +0200, Slava Pechenin wrote:
> Hello Mutt Users,
>
> Could you give me directions how to organize address book
> working with Mutt? How do you handle this task?
Use a text editor. :)
This is the first line of my .muttrc file:
source ~/.mutt_aliase
Hello Mutt Users,
Could you give me directions how to organize address book
working with Mutt? How do you handle this task?
Thanks.
Hi,
Something very weird happened today, and I don't know if it is a hassle
with my ncurses or mutt.
Firstly, my mailcap file has these lines :
text/html; konqueror %s; test=runningX.sh
text/html; w3m -T text/html %s
text/html; lynx -dump -force_html %s;copiousoutput
As you can see, I run a te
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001, Slava Pechenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Mutt Users,
>
> I am trying to make Mutt quote my replies in the following "smart" way:
> if original email is from "Tom Buddy" then quote string must be "TB> ".
>
> In ~/.muttrc :
> set indent_string=`indent.pl %n`
>
> But
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:19:41AM -0700, Steven Schneider wrote:
> Ok, I imagine that I have to substitute my mailboxes/dirs in thoses
> lines, but I woundn't mind having those others (i.e. sent,
> postponed, trash, etc...) do I have to make those before hand?
> Will mutt create those for me w
Steve --
...and then Steven Schneider said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:35:43AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
% >
% > * Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-09 03:00]:
% > >
% > >How about this? (wrapped, should be all one line in .muttrc)
% > >
% > >mailboxes ! `find ~/Mail/ -type f | pe
Nicolas --
...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:49:52AM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > That's easy:
% >
% > mutt_dotlock source_file
% > mutt_dotlock archive_file
% > grepmail -d "before date..." | gzip -9 >> archive_file
% > grepmail -v
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:49:52AM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's easy:
>
> mutt_dotlock source_file
> mutt_dotlock archive_file
> grepmail -d "before date..." | gzip -9 >> archive_file
> grepmail -v -d "before date..." > tmpfile
> mv -f tmpfile source_file
> mu
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 10:05:52PM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2001 Slava Pechenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> > Hello Mutt Users,
> >
> > I am trying to make Mutt quote my replies in the following "smart" way:
> > if original email is from "Tom B
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 05:46:41PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:06:42AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:20:03PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote:
> > > I've just noticed that if you are cycling through the command history
> > > and abort with a ^G, th
Nicolas --
...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said...
%
% On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:26:56AM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% > Hmmm... Not for moving stuff out; grepmail will do a good job of finding
% > the messages but that doesn't help you empty the big box.
...
%
% I think grepma
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 08:12:48PM -0800, Mike Erickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few times, I've been going through old mail in one of my mailboxes and
> noticed a mail with no subject. Opening it up reveals an entire email
> message, headers and all, in the body. I'm using sendmail, procmail,
> bif
Hi,
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001 Slava Pechenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> Hello Mutt Users,
>
> I am trying to make Mutt quote my replies in the following "smart" way:
> if original email is from "Tom Buddy" then quote string must be "TB> ".
Firstly, IMHO, it is not a very good idea t
Hi,
Today seems to be a bad day for my mutt ...
I have applied the above patch (which is real cool, BTW :-), but there
is one hassle. If the said folder has no messages, and I hit
, bound by default to '~', Mutt dies with a Segmentation
fault (SIGSEGV signal).
Is this a bug ? Is there a fix ?
Hello Mutt Users,
I am trying to make Mutt quote my replies in the following "smart" way:
if original email is from "Tom Buddy" then quote string must be "TB> ".
In ~/.muttrc :
set indent_string=`indent.pl %n`
But indent.pl receives ARGV[0] eq '%n', not 'Tom Buddy'.
What am I missing?
Thanks.
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:35:43AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
>
> * Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-09 03:00]:
> >
> >How about this? (wrapped, should be all one line in .muttrc)
> >
> >mailboxes ! `find ~/Mail/ -type f | perl -ne 'chomp; print "$_ " unless
> >m/^.*(postponed|sent.mail.*
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 06:26:56AM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm... Not for moving stuff out; grepmail will do a good job of finding
> the messages but that doesn't help you empty the big box.
>
> Can you guarantee that the items in this mailbox are in a sensible
> received
Hi,
On Sat, 08 Dec 2001 Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
> The macros work great except for when I view an individual attacment
> ('v' to get to view-attachments menu, '' to display message
> attachment). In this case, the macro is still active since the
> attachme
Benjamin D muttered:
> > folder-hook . macro index d "~/mail/trashy"
> > folder-hook . macro pager d "~/mail/trashy"
> > folder-hook trash macro index d ""
> > folder-hook trash macro pager d ""
>
> The macros work great except for when I view an individual attacment
> ('v' to get
Nicolas --
...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said...
%
% On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:16:49PM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% >
% > ...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said...
% >
...
% > % What makes the output a bit less messier is to call:
% > % env TERM=dumb mutt ...
% >
% > That's not
I have similar macros defined (with the 'y' removed as suggested in a
followup).
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Stephen E. Hargrove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've defined the following macro sequences:
>
> folder-hook . macro index d "~/mail/trashy"
> folder-hook . macro pager d "~/ma
Moin,
* Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-09 03:00]:
>On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:30:20PM -0700, Steven Schneider wrote:
>> Right now I have three lines like thus:
>>
>> mailboxes ...
>> mailboxes ...
>> mailboxes ...
>
>How about this? (wrapped, should be all one line in .muttrc)
>
>mailbo
92 matches
Mail list logo
