* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > ...and then Thomas Hurst said... > > Seriously, what's so wrong with '> ' that it isn't acceptable for > > everyone? :) > > Do you want my semi-canned answer, or should I just keep quiet on this > one? :-)/2
I want your answer, so I may decide on a suitable punishment :) > > > What am I missing? > > > > How evil this is ;) > > Now we're certainly in agreement there! :-) Agreeing that FO> is evil while using something even worse doesn't help your defence much ;) -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aagh.net/
