Thomas, et al -- ...and then Thomas Roessler said... % % I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
I see the new PATCHES file and its use in the ChangeLog. Yay :-) One thing that I note is that, unless I'm confused (not out of the question by any means), the patches will be listed in the PATCHES file and thus in `mutt -v` in the reverse of the order in which they were applied. That is, if I ran tar xpfz mutt-1.3.24i.tar.gz cd mutt-1.3.24 patch < ../compressed patch < ../outlook make ./mutt -v I would see ... patch.outlook patch.compressed in my results. Is this desirable? Unfortunately there's no OS-portable way to reverse the PATCHES file's order; not all OSs have tac (or is it rev?) or perl. Can the patch that updates PATCHES append the patch to the BOTTOM of the file, perhaps by inserting right before a THIS-IS-THE-END-OF-THE-FILE magic token that patchlist.sh can recognize and ignore? Perhaps it's trivial, but with the cocktail I use it's quite important to know which patches were applied in which order -- and I'd have to have to think bottom-up :-) TIA & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg21382/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
