What I think:
- folder name: "Apache Flex"
Further nesting to a folder "Utilities" is unnecessary, since we don't have any
"production" applications (like for instance Flash Builder, or Flash), and most
likely never will release any. All of our apps will most likely stay
"utilities"; application
On Oct 23, 2012 11:35 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>
> Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no
> objection... but I'm on a Mac. On Windows, yes, I totally agree that
> it should be in a general directory 'Apache Flex', but maybe not in
> it's own subdirectory, but in a dire
Ok, excellent!
Any other suggestions that will make the presentation of the app more
"professional"? Not in the UI, mind you, that would make it too much
work in this release cycle, but for the installation and presentation?
EdB
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot
wrote:
>
I was thinking the same.
I don't have any application that camel cases it's name on my mac.
Check out the Flash Player and general adobe Installer apps. They all have long
descriptive names.
I'm convinced this is the way we should follow.
Hans
On 24 Oct 2012, at 08:50, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
That's even better, I don't think it's a problem but I don't use Windows.
-omar
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Agreed. Just to make sure: Windows has a problem with spaces in app
> names? If not, why not make it a nice, readable "Apache Flex SDK
> Installer"?
>
> EdB
>
>
>
Agreed. Just to make sure: Windows has a problem with spaces in app
names? If not, why not make it a nice, readable "Apache Flex SDK
Installer"?
EdB
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd name.
> ApacheFlexSD
Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd name.
ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those lines.
-omar
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no
> objection... but
Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no
objection... but I'm on a Mac. On Windows, yes, I totally agree that
it should be in a general directory 'Apache Flex', but maybe not in
it's own subdirectory, but in a directory 'utilities'? And are we (or
the Installer installer) c
On Oct 23, 2012 10:36 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> I'm ok with reviewing another RC, but I don't think it is necessary. At
any
> point in time, we might want to change its name again later to qualify
some
> other aspect of the release.
>
It is not the name I am worried about. It is about direct
> I hope for the next SDK release the installer releases at the same time and
> shows up in the web page right under it source packages so it is clear what
> it is going to install.
Fun fact: the installer is agnostic of the SDK release. The config XML
defines the latest version of the SDK to disp
I'm ok with reviewing another RC, but I don't think it is necessary. At any
point in time, we might want to change its name again later to qualify some
other aspect of the release.
I hope for the next SDK release the installer releases at the same time and
shows up in the web page right under it
You know I'm always up for another RC :-)
EdB
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Om wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <
> h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote:
>
>> +1. Great job, definitely!
>> Looks and functions good enough for now, although I rally think the
>> na
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <
h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote:
> +1. Great job, definitely!
> Looks and functions good enough for now, although I rally think the
> name of the application should not be "InstallApacheFlex" but it should be
> in a folder "Apache Flex" a
+1. Great job, definitely!
Looks and functions good enough for now, although I rally think the name of
the application should not be "InstallApacheFlex" but it should be in a folder
"Apache Flex" and be called "Apache Flex SDK Installer", especially for the
first official release.
On 23
+1 (binding)
Installed the new version over the previous one. Got an upgrade message and
all went well.
regards,
Christophe
2012/10/23 Om
> Dave and Bertrand, if you could cast your votes, that would be great.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski >wrote:
Dave and Bertrand, if you could cast your votes, that would be great.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> Good work again guys. Excited to tell the world about it ;)
>
> -Nick
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <
>
+1 (Binding)
Good work again guys. Excited to tell the world about it ;)
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <
h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote:
> This is true.
> When you build with a different certificate,
> you always need to delete the previous installed version of
This is true.
When you build with a different certificate,
you always need to delete the previous installed version of an application in
order to install the new version.
On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:21, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> This might be the issue where you need to uninstall a previous version
>
+1 (binding)
Signatures matched.
Source built on OSX.
Line endings on README looked good for each platform.
Installed in FlashBuilder 4.7 and built simple AIR and FP apps on OSX.
Carol
On 10/22/12 4 :50PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>Signature matched.
>Source built.
>Install worked
This might be the issue where you need to uninstall a previous version
of the app first. Om explained something about certificates... Om?
EdB
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> Installed and all went fine. md5 matched for both platforms. Line ending
> are correct for th
Carol,
I was getting the same issue, and I think it had to do with a beta AIR
runtime I had installed. Installed the latest released version and
everything cleaned up.
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> Installed and all went fine. md5 matched for both platforms.
Installed and all went fine. md5 matched for both platforms. Line ending
are correct for the platform. Simple AIR and Players apps compile with
FlashBuilder 4.7 on OSX.
However then I clicked the Install InstallApacheFlex icon again and I got
the "Sorry an error has occurred. This application
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> On 10/22/12 2:42 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > - flash builder keeps asking me for an "undefined property INSTALLER".
> >
> >
> > No idea where this is coming from, sorry.
> I think there was a variable in project properties. I replaced it
On 10/22/12 2:42 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
>
> - flash builder keeps asking me for an "undefined property INSTALLER".
>
>
> No idea where this is coming from, sorry.
I think there was a variable in project properties. I replaced it with an
explicit path to get around it.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK
Aah, Ant.. Never used it before.
Thank you, I'll figure it out.
On 22 Oct 2012, at 23:42, Om wrote:
> Hans,
>
> Your questions are mostly answered in the README file, here:
> http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC8/READme
>
> More detailed answers:
>
> - I suppose the "com
+1
Good job!
Stefan Horochovec
2012/10/22 Greg Reddin
> +1 binding
>
> Thanks!
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Om wrote:
> > *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
> > Disabled (i.e. hid) UI for selecting languages. The app will now default
> > to en_US.
> > Other langua
Hans,
Your questions are mostly answered in the README file, here:
http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC8/READme
More detailed answers:
- I suppose the "common" project is not in the svn on
> incubator.apache.org/flex/source.html, right? So: where do i find this..?
The comm
Still a few questions about this..
- I suppose the "common" project is not in the svn on
incubator.apache.org/flex/source.html, right? So: where do i find this..?
- also i need to download and import an external as3-commons build i think? Is
there any reason why this isn't included in the svn?
-
+1 binding
Thanks!
Greg
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Om wrote:
> *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
> Disabled (i.e. hid) UI for selecting languages. The app will now default
> to en_US.
> Other languages will be enabled again in the next release after bug fixing
> and thorough t
+1 (binding)
Signature matched.
Source built.
Install worked.
-Alex
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Guess what...
+1 (binding)
:-)
EdB
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Om wrote:
> *Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
> Disabled (i.e. hid) UI for selecting languages. The app will now default
> to en_US.
> Other languages will be enabled again in the next release after bug fixing
>
*Issues addressed in this Release Candidate:*
Disabled (i.e. hid) UI for selecting languages. The app will now default
to en_US.
Other languages will be enabled again in the next release after bug fixing
and thorough testing.
This is the first official release of the InstallApacheFlex AIR
applica
Hm, I probably didn't..
Will have a look at it tonight, thx
On 22 Oct 2012, at 15:46, Stefan Horochovec wrote:
> Hans
>
> I dont have any problem when I import the project for my workspace. You
> linked the common/src in your project?
>
> Regards
>
> Stefan Horochovec
>
>
>
> 2012/10/22 St
Hans
I dont have any problem when I import the project for my workspace. You
linked the common/src in your project?
Regards
Stefan Horochovec
2012/10/22 Stefan Horochovec
> Erik
>
> You check the path that I send on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33223 ?
>
> I believe this bug
Erik
You check the path that I send on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33223 ?
I believe this bug can be happening in different ways, since the MacOS
environment with AIR 3.4 (Alex) the result was a little different from
mine. He did not return to the environment in Portuguese, and set
Hi Erik,
Sure thing.
I will create a ticket a ticket with all of my remarks this evening.
Also I had problems with checking out the source code (flex builder says it was
missing common.swc etc), so maybe I'll create a ticket for this as well, if it
can be declared as a "bug".
Hans
On 22 Oct
Hans,
Can you please create a JIRA ticket with your "functionality" remarks
(below)? I will start work on this soon after the release of v 1.0,
and having this all at hand in JIRA will help me a lot.
Thanks,
EdB
> Here is what I found for the functionality:
> - The name of the application loo
After watching Stefan's video I'm changing my vote to -1.
I tried to reproduce this myself on Friday and I wasn't able to but now
that I see it I think this issue needs to be fixed. If you decide to fix
this and need my help I can assist.
I think all the GUI design, layout and language consisten
On 10/19/12 5:17 PM, "Stefan Horochovec"
wrote:
> Alex
>
> What AIR version you are running?
3.4
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
Hi guys,
I did some testing on the installer as well before I was going to vote, and
after following Christophe Herreman's opinion, I decided to +1 on this as well,
although I think there are a few important (but non-blocking) issues (if this
previous one in this topic isn't blocking of course)
Well
You can see this video, I'm recording to show how the bug happen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AlmwX75RqM
Stefan Horochovec
2012/10/19 Stefan Horochovec
> Alex
>
> What AIR version you are running?
>
>
> Stefan Horochovec
>
>
>
>
> 2012/10/19 Alex Harui
>
>> Changing vote to -1 bec
Alex
What AIR version you are running?
Stefan Horochovec
2012/10/19 Alex Harui
> Changing vote to -1 because of locale issue.
>
>
> On 10/19/12 8:05 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> > I'm not going to change my vote at this point, but consider these points:
> >
> > 1) Why would doing a point re
Changing vote to -1 because of locale issue.
On 10/19/12 8:05 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
> I'm not going to change my vote at this point, but consider these points:
>
> 1) Why would doing a point release right after be less work and get more
> involvement?
> 2) Why do we think we will get two oth
We have potential fix but that is not tested. We don't know how many new
issues that the fix would introduce.
Any time you add code, there is potential for new bugs be introduced. I
don't want to take that risk now.
Thanks,
Om
On Oct 19, 2012 9:21 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/19/12 8
On 10/19/12 11 :57AM, "Om" wrote:
>It is not about 7 RCs. The 7th RC just got enough votes and we are going
>to promote it to an actual release.
>
>Close to 20 people voted +1 and we got 2 -1s. As a release manager, I
>think this is good enough for a release.
True you got 20 votes but how ma
On 10/19/12 8:57 AM, "Om" wrote:
> It is not about 7 RCs. The 7th RC just got enough votes and we are going
> to promote it to an actual release.
>
> Close to 20 people voted +1 and we got 2 -1s. As a release manager, I
> think this is good enough for a release.
If 20 people vote +1, you ha
On 10/19/12 12 :11PM, "Mikhail Vorobyov"
wrote:
>Why don't you want to set AIR 3.4 and playerglobal11_4.swc for downloading
>but only 3.1 and 11.1?
Neither of those are officially supported with Apache Flex 4.8. They may
work but we haven't tested them yet. Apache Flex 4.8 was a parity relea
Why don't you want to set AIR 3.4 and playerglobal11_4.swc for downloading
but only 3.1 and 11.1?
2012/10/19 Om
> It is not about 7 RCs. The 7th RC just got enough votes and we are going
> to promote it to an actual release.
>
> Close to 20 people voted +1 and we got 2 -1s. As a release manage
It is not about 7 RCs. The 7th RC just got enough votes and we are going
to promote it to an actual release.
Close to 20 people voted +1 and we got 2 -1s. As a release manager, I
think this is good enough for a release.
The issue is not blocker since there is an obvious workaround. And there
a
I'm not going to change my vote at this point, but consider these points:
1) Why would doing a point release right after be less work and get more
involvement?
2) Why do we think we will get two other mentor/IPMC votes if they review
the dev-list and see this issue?
3) Why do we think we will get
Hello everybody,
The installer works, as I spent the walkthrough in JIRA and in my last
email, that information may be contained on the page to access the
Installer.
I upgraded my vote to -1 because I have found a bug. I shared the same
opinion of Christophe Herreman, it´s my opinion too. Where h
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Christophe Herreman <
christophe.herre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry about this, but why would you release the installer in it's current
> state? I know there is a lot of "pressure" and excitement to get this
> released, but there are currently clearly some bigger i
OK all, thanks for the feedback. I agree that we need to release often and
early, although in certain cases it doesn't feel quite right.
Since there are no blocking issues, a release is justified I guess.
+1 (binding)
regards,
Christophe
2012/10/19 Om
> This issue will be fixed in the next re
This issue will be fixed in the next release.
I know and agree that this is not perfect, but we cannot delay a release
till we get everything perfect. We will never release anything if we wait
to fix every issue that we discover.
This is not a release blocker issue, nor does it have security
imp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
;)
2012/10/19 Omar Gonzalez :
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Christophe Herreman <
> christophe.herre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry about this, but why would you release the installer in it's current
>> state? I know there is a lot
Sorry about this, but why would you release the installer in it's current
state? I know there is a lot of "pressure" and excitement to get this
released, but there are currently clearly some bigger issues with the
proposed RC in terms of translations.
IMO it's better to delay the release until the
Yes...please, release
2012/10/19 Omar Gonzalez :
> Release, release, release!!!
>
> -omar
>
> On Thursday, October 18, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
>> Stefan,
>>
>> I understand the problem, and I see the implications. That's why I
>> push for a quick "point" update AFTER this release, to adre
Release, release, release!!!
-omar
On Thursday, October 18, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> I understand the problem, and I see the implications. That's why I
> push for a quick "point" update AFTER this release, to adress this and
> other known issues. In fact, I'll enter your fix into
Stefan,
I understand the problem, and I see the implications. That's why I
push for a quick "point" update AFTER this release, to adress this and
other known issues. In fact, I'll enter your fix into the source this
weekend, if it checks out.
However, I sense that after 7 (!) release candidates,
Erik
It's possible to run the installer in operating systems that have language
available on Installer and that is different from en_US, however, have to
be done the process of changing the language of the installer for en_US.
If you try to install and don't change the language to en_US, the
inst
Stefan,
Thank you for your contribution! As we discussed, I'll look into your
patches as soon as I can, and I'm sure they will prove valid and
useful.
Would you agree that if we do an update soon, lack of true
internationalisation shouldn't be a deal breaker for this first
release?
EdB
On Fri
-1
My first test was done in an environment in English, but when I changed my
OS to my local language (Portuguese), to test the translations, the result
was not good.
In step where are defined which license will be accepted, just no option on
the left appears only when the switch is made the sele
Sounds good.
I will wait one more day for Dave Fisher to vote here. After that I will
post the vote thread on general.
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> I know Bertrand is off-line until at least next Monday. I'd say take it
> to general since he can vote t
I know Bertrand is off-line until at least next Monday. I'd say take it
to general since he can vote there just as well as here. You still need a
3rd vote if I remember correctly.
Carol
On 10/18/12 3 :13PM, "Om" wrote:
>We have one +1 vote from a mentor (Greg Reddin - IPMC member) It would b
We have one +1 vote from a mentor (Greg Reddin - IPMC member) It would be
great if the other two mentors would vote here. That way, when we take it
to general@incubator, it would sail through easier [1].
Should I wait for the mentor votes here, or should I take it directly to
general@incubator?
+1 Binding.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Roland Zwaga >wrote:
>
> > downloaded and installed like a boss ;)
>
>
> worked for me
>
> +1 binding
>
> --
> Jonathan Campos
>
Great!
Stefan Horochovec
2012/10/18 Erik de Bruin
> Cool!
>
> We're planning on doing a .1 update not too long after the release, to
> tie up ends like these. Moving forward, I like it ;-)
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Stefan Horochovec
> wrote:
> > Erik
> >
> > Tonight I
Cool!
We're planning on doing a .1 update not too long after the release, to
tie up ends like these. Moving forward, I like it ;-)
EdB
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Stefan Horochovec
wrote:
> Erik
>
> Tonight I will download and compare all languages and open tickets.
>
> The translation i
Erik
Tonight I will download and compare all languages and open tickets.
The translation into Portuguese I will update if necessary and submit the
diff's
Regards
Stefan Horochovec
Software Engineer
Blog: http://www.horochovec.com.br/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/horochovec
2012/10/18 Erik de
Stefan,
Excellent idea. Would you like to do the honors and add a ticket for
each of the languages that is not complete - which really is all but
en_US ;-)
Thanks!
EdB
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Stefan Horochovec
wrote:
> Om
>
> How about registering the need to update the translations
Om
How about registering the need to update the translations in JIRA? So would
be easier to know when there is need to review some translation.
Regards
Stefan Horochovec
Software Engineer
Blog: http://www.horochovec.com.br/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/horochovec
2012/10/17 Om
> On Wed, Oct
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>
> On 10/17/12 9 :06AM, "Christophe Herreman"
> wrote:
>
> >I gave this a spin and here is some feedback:
> >
> >- the application did not install and I got an error saying that the
> >installer was probably misconfigured. It turned out
On 10/17/12 9 :06AM, "Christophe Herreman"
wrote:
>I gave this a spin and here is some feedback:
>
>- the application did not install and I got an error saying that the
>installer was probably misconfigured. It turned out that I did not
>uninstall a previous version of the application. After do
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Roland Zwaga wrote:
> downloaded and installed like a boss ;)
worked for me
+1 binding
--
Jonathan Campos
I gave this a spin and here is some feedback:
- the application did not install and I got an error saying that the
installer was probably misconfigured. It turned out that I did not
uninstall a previous version of the application. After doing so, the
application did install. Will this be the case
+1
downloaded and installed like a boss ;)
+1 (binding)
+1 binding
+1
Great job! Congratulations to all concerned.
Regards,
Mike Robinson
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Om wrote:
> *Issues addressed:*
> Fixed typos.
>
> This is the first official release of the InstallApacheFlex AIR
> application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit which
+1 (binding)
PGP key verifies.
Package builds, installs, runs.
Resulting folder bin-diffs against prior RCs.
Thanks for hanging in there.
-Alex
On 10/15/12 10:58 AM, "Om" wrote:
> *Issues addressed:*
> Fixed typos.
>
> This is the first official release of the InstallApacheFlex AIR
> applic
+1 (binding)
Om & Erik, thanks for the perseverance, an installer like this will
definitely help the cause in the long run.
Mike
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Om wrote:
> *Please vote to approve this release:*
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
+1 binding.
I'm sorry that you all had so much trouble getting this ready and I'm
sorry to not have offered feedback an
On Oct 15, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Om wrote:
> *Please vote to approve this release:*
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Regards,
> Om & Erik
> Apache Flex PPMC members + Release managers
+1 (binding)
Sorry I didn't realize that. False alarm then.
Carol
On 10/15/12 3 :03PM, "Om" wrote:
>>
>> If this is RC7
>> the files should be apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.
>> 7-incubating etc.
>>
>
>Nope. RC7 corresponds to 1.0.6.
>
>RC1 -> 1.0.0
>RC2 -> 1.0.1
>RC3 -> 1.0.2
>RC4 -> 1.0.3
>RC5 -> 1.0.4
>
> If this is RC7
> the files should be apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.
> 7-incubating etc.
>
Nope. RC7 corresponds to 1.0.6.
RC1 -> 1.0.0
RC2 -> 1.0.1
RC3 -> 1.0.2
RC4 -> 1.0.3
RC5 -> 1.0.4
RC6 -> 1.0.5
Keeping up with this convention, RC7 -> 1.0.6.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Carol
If I go to http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/installapacheflex_RC7/ I
see apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.6-incubating-src.tar.gz. If this is RC7
the files should be apache-flex-sdk-installer-1.0.7-incubating etc.
When I build I see
update-version-in-xml-files:
[echo] version in InstallAp
They are the correct names. What exactly is the problem?
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> I haven't even installed it yet but I see a problem with the kit names.
> They need to be updated for RC7.
>
> Carol
>
> On 10/15/12 1 :58PM, "Om" wrote:
>
> >*Issues addressed:*
I haven't even installed it yet but I see a problem with the kit names.
They need to be updated for RC7.
Carol
On 10/15/12 1 :58PM, "Om" wrote:
>*Issues addressed:*
>Fixed typos.
>
>This is the first official release of the InstallApacheFlex AIR
>application. The official Apache distribution i
+1 (binding)
Good job, yet again.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
+1 (binding)
+1 (binding)... fingers crossed!
;-)
EdB
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Om wrote:
> *Issues addressed:*
> Fixed typos.
>
> This is the first official release of the InstallApacheFlex AIR
> application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit which can
> contains only source.
>
>
*Issues addressed:*
Fixed typos.
This is the first official release of the InstallApacheFlex AIR
application. The official Apache distribution is the source kit which can
contains only source.
The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bigosmallm/i
I've been pulling them down and testing them. They have been working great
-- but I'm not the right person to check for license and EULA issues. You
still have my +1.
-Nick
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jun Heider wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
>
> >> I ag
On Oct 12, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
>> I agree that seems like very few people want to see this get released.
>> Otherwise we would have had more votes.
>
> You have my vote immediately on the next RC. I am sorry, like many others, I
> think I got lost in the stream of releas
>I agree that seems like very few people want to see this get released.
>Otherwise we would have had more votes.
You have my vote immediately on the next RC. I am sorry, like many others, I
think I got lost in the stream of release candidates and didn't feel like I
knew enough about the version
On 10/12/12 3 :18AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Carol Frampton
>wrote:
>> ...We'll have to wait for one of the mentors to find out if a KEYS file
>>is
>> required in the source package
>
>No, I'd say having them in there is bad, as someone could mess wit
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Om wrote:
> ...No software is perfect. The longer we scrutinize this the more problems we
> will dig out, which frankly are getting trivial and trivial...
To add to the general empathy, I'd say that this particular module,
which downloads (and I initially thought
I agree that seems like very few people want to see this get released.
Otherwise we would have had more votes.
No software is perfect. The longer we scrutinize this the more problems we
will dig out, which frankly are getting trivial and trivial. We need to
come together and say that this is suf
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> ...We'll have to wait for one of the mentors to find out if a KEYS file is
> required in the source package
No, I'd say having them in there is bad, as someone could mess with
both that files and the archive's signature then - people mu
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
