Agreed. Just to make sure: Windows has a problem with spaces in app names? If not, why not make it a nice, readable "Apache Flex SDK Installer"?
EdB On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez <omarg.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd name. > ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those lines. > > -omar > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote: > >> Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no >> objection... but I'm on a Mac. On Windows, yes, I totally agree that >> it should be in a general directory 'Apache Flex', but maybe not in >> it's own subdirectory, but in a directory 'utilities'? And are we (or >> the Installer installer) creating shortcuts in the Start menu (while >> it lasts...) and on the Desktop? If so, what are their names? >> >> All this ties very strongly with the "first impressions" thing, which >> I feel very strong about. >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Oct 23, 2012 10:36 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm ok with reviewing another RC, but I don't think it is necessary. At >> > any >> >> point in time, we might want to change its name again later to qualify >> > some >> >> other aspect of the release. >> >> >> > >> > It is not the name I am worried about. It is about directory in which >> it >> > will get installed under. >> > >> > Instead of installing under Program Files(x86)/InstallApacheFlex/, we >> > should install it under Program Files(x86)/Apache Flex/InstallApacheFlex. >> > This will help be more organized when we release more utilities/tools. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Om >> > >> >> I hope for the next SDK release the installer releases at the same time >> > and >> >> shows up in the web page right under it source packages so it is clear >> > what >> >> it is going to install. >> >> >> >> On 10/23/12 10:27 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >> >> >> > You know I'm always up for another RC :-) >> >> > >> >> > EdB >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans | dotdotcommadot < >> >> >> h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> +1. Great job, definitely! >> >> >>> Looks and functions good enough for now, although I reeeeally think >> > the >> >> >>> name of the application should not be "InstallApacheFlex" but it >> > should be >> >> >>> in a folder "Apache Flex" and be called "Apache Flex SDK Installer", >> >> >>> especially for the first official release. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> You make too much sense :-) >> >> >> >> >> >> This sounds easy enough to do. And if we dont do it now, we wont be >> > able >> >> >> to do this in subsequent releases without causing confusion. >> >> >> >> >> >> RC9 okay with folks? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Om >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 19:49, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as> >> > wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> +1 (Binding) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Good work again guys. Excited to tell the world about it ;) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -Nick >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot < >> >> >>>> h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>> This is true. >> >> >>>>> When you build with a different certificate, >> >> >>>>> you always need to delete the previous installed version of an >> >> >>> application >> >> >>>>> in order to install the new version. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:21, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> This might be the issue where you need to uninstall a previous >> > version >> >> >>>>>> of the app first. Om explained something about certificates... >> Om? >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> EdB >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>< -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
