Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd name. ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those lines.
-omar On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no > objection... but I'm on a Mac. On Windows, yes, I totally agree that > it should be in a general directory 'Apache Flex', but maybe not in > it's own subdirectory, but in a directory 'utilities'? And are we (or > the Installer installer) creating shortcuts in the Start menu (while > it lasts...) and on the Desktop? If so, what are their names? > > All this ties very strongly with the "first impressions" thing, which > I feel very strong about. > > EdB > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 23, 2012 10:36 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> > >> I'm ok with reviewing another RC, but I don't think it is necessary. At > > any > >> point in time, we might want to change its name again later to qualify > > some > >> other aspect of the release. > >> > > > > It is not the name I am worried about. It is about directory in which > it > > will get installed under. > > > > Instead of installing under Program Files(x86)/InstallApacheFlex/, we > > should install it under Program Files(x86)/Apache Flex/InstallApacheFlex. > > This will help be more organized when we release more utilities/tools. > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > >> I hope for the next SDK release the installer releases at the same time > > and > >> shows up in the web page right under it source packages so it is clear > > what > >> it is going to install. > >> > >> On 10/23/12 10:27 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >> > >> > You know I'm always up for another RC :-) > >> > > >> > EdB > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans | dotdotcommadot < > >> >> h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> +1. Great job, definitely! > >> >>> Looks and functions good enough for now, although I reeeeally think > > the > >> >>> name of the application should not be "InstallApacheFlex" but it > > should be > >> >>> in a folder "Apache Flex" and be called "Apache Flex SDK Installer", > >> >>> especially for the first official release. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> You make too much sense :-) > >> >> > >> >> This sounds easy enough to do. And if we dont do it now, we wont be > > able > >> >> to do this in subsequent releases without causing confusion. > >> >> > >> >> RC9 okay with folks? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Om > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 19:49, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as> > > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> +1 (Binding) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Good work again guys. Excited to tell the world about it ;) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> -Nick > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot < > >> >>>> h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> This is true. > >> >>>>> When you build with a different certificate, > >> >>>>> you always need to delete the previous installed version of an > >> >>> application > >> >>>>> in order to install the new version. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:21, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> > wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> This might be the issue where you need to uninstall a previous > > version > >> >>>>>> of the app first. Om explained something about certificates... > Om? > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> EdB > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>><
