Ok, excellent! Any other suggestions that will make the presentation of the app more "professional"? Not in the UI, mind you, that would make it too much work in this release cycle, but for the installation and presentation?
EdB On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote: > I was thinking the same. > I don't have any application that camel cases it's name on my mac. > Check out the Flash Player and general adobe Installer apps. They all have > long descriptive names. > I'm convinced this is the way we should follow. > > Hans > > On 24 Oct 2012, at 08:50, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >> Agreed. Just to make sure: Windows has a problem with spaces in app >> names? If not, why not make it a nice, readable "Apache Flex SDK >> Installer"? >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez >> <omarg.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd name. >>> ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those lines. >>> >>> -omar >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote: >>> >>>> Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no >>>> objection... but I'm on a Mac. On Windows, yes, I totally agree that >>>> it should be in a general directory 'Apache Flex', but maybe not in >>>> it's own subdirectory, but in a directory 'utilities'? And are we (or >>>> the Installer installer) creating shortcuts in the Start menu (while >>>> it lasts...) and on the Desktop? If so, what are their names? >>>> >>>> All this ties very strongly with the "first impressions" thing, which >>>> I feel very strong about. >>>> >>>> EdB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On Oct 23, 2012 10:36 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm ok with reviewing another RC, but I don't think it is necessary. At >>>>> any >>>>>> point in time, we might want to change its name again later to qualify >>>>> some >>>>>> other aspect of the release. >>>>> >>>>> It is not the name I am worried about. It is about directory in which >>>> it >>>>> will get installed under. >>>>> >>>>> Instead of installing under Program Files(x86)/InstallApacheFlex/, we >>>>> should install it under Program Files(x86)/Apache Flex/InstallApacheFlex. >>>>> This will help be more organized when we release more utilities/tools. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Om >>>>> >>>>>> I hope for the next SDK release the installer releases at the same time >>>>> and >>>>>> shows up in the web page right under it source packages so it is clear >>>>> what >>>>>> it is going to install. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 10/23/12 10:27 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You know I'm always up for another RC :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans | dotdotcommadot < >>>>>>>> h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1. Great job, definitely! >>>>>>>>> Looks and functions good enough for now, although I reeeeally think >>>>> the >>>>>>>>> name of the application should not be "InstallApacheFlex" but it >>>>> should be >>>>>>>>> in a folder "Apache Flex" and be called "Apache Flex SDK Installer", >>>>>>>>> especially for the first official release. >>>>>>>> You make too much sense :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This sounds easy enough to do. And if we dont do it now, we wont be >>>>> able >>>>>>>> to do this in subsequent releases without causing confusion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> RC9 okay with folks? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Om >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 19:49, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (Binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Good work again guys. Excited to tell the world about it ;) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Nick >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot < >>>>>>>>>> h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This is true. >>>>>>>>>>> When you build with a different certificate, >>>>>>>>>>> you always need to delete the previous installed version of an >>>>>>>>> application >>>>>>>>>>> in order to install the new version. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:21, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This might be the issue where you need to uninstall a previous >>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>> of the app first. Om explained something about certificates... >>>> Om? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> < >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
