That's even better, I don't think it's a problem but I don't use Windows. -omar
On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Agreed. Just to make sure: Windows has a problem with spaces in app > names? If not, why not make it a nice, readable "Apache Flex SDK > Installer"? > > EdB > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez > <omarg.develo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd > name. > > ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those > lines. > > > > -omar > > > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > > >> Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no > >> objection... but I'm on a Mac. On Windows, yes, I totally agree that > >> it should be in a general directory 'Apache Flex', but maybe not in > >> it's own subdirectory, but in a directory 'utilities'? And are we (or > >> the Installer installer) creating shortcuts in the Start menu (while > >> it lasts...) and on the Desktop? If so, what are their names? > >> > >> All this ties very strongly with the "first impressions" thing, which > >> I feel very strong about. > >> > >> EdB > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Oct 23, 2012 10:36 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I'm ok with reviewing another RC, but I don't think it is necessary. > At > >> > any > >> >> point in time, we might want to change its name again later to > qualify > >> > some > >> >> other aspect of the release. > >> >> > >> > > >> > It is not the name I am worried about. It is about directory in > which > >> it > >> > will get installed under. > >> > > >> > Instead of installing under Program Files(x86)/InstallApacheFlex/, we > >> > should install it under Program Files(x86)/Apache > Flex/InstallApacheFlex. > >> > This will help be more organized when we release more utilities/tools. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Om > >> > > >> >> I hope for the next SDK release the installer releases at the same > time > >> > and > >> >> shows up in the web page right under it source packages so it is > clear > >> > what > >> >> it is going to install. > >> >> > >> >> On 10/23/12 10:27 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > You know I'm always up for another RC :-) > >> >> > > >> >> > EdB > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Om <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans | dotdotcommadot < > >> >> >> h...@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> +1. Great job, definitely! > >> >> >>> Looks and functions good enough for now, although I reeeeally > think > >> > the > >> >> >>> name of the application should not be "InstallApacheFlex" but it > >> > should be > >> >> >>> in a folder "Apache Flex" and be called "Apache Flex SDK > Installer", > >> >> >>> especially for the first official release. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> You make too much sense :-) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> This sounds easy enough to do. And if we dont do it now, we > wont be > >> > able > >> >> >> to do this in subsequent releases without causing confusion. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> RC9 okay with folks? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks, > >> >> >> Om > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 19:49, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <-- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
