I agree that seems like very few people want to see this get released. Otherwise we would have had more votes.
No software is perfect. The longer we scrutinize this the more problems we will dig out, which frankly are getting trivial and trivial. We need to come together and say that this is sufficient for a release and ship it out. There is always going to be a "next" release where we can fix issues. That is the nature of shipping software. Thanks, Om On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > I'm frustrated too, but remember, my vote isn't holding up the release > per-se. I cannot veto the release. If enough of you want to vote to ship > it with these mistakes I cannot prevent that. > However, I personally don't like obvious spelling and grammatical errors. > It just makes us look bad. I'm sorry I didn't scrutinize the change list > for the SWFObject change before, but also, I miss lots of things when > scanning diffs. My main focus has been on trying to get every mustella > test > to pass. Maybe I should have prioritized the Installer more than I did. > > -Alex > > > On 10/11/12 11:52 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > These things (an extra 'The', really?) should not hold up a release > > indefinitely. It's like the project doesn't want to release this. Or, > > if it's so important to the project that having a capitalised "The" in > > the documents will ruin the project's reputation, why aren't more > > people contributing so Om and I can rely on the extra eyeballs BEFORE > > we cut an RC? I've stood by and contributed through 6 (!) release > > candidates, but my patience has run out. Working on the minutiae of > > text based changes in supporting files and the work associated with > > creating reliable release candidates has prevented me from doing > > meaningful contributions to Mustella, the website and the next version > > of the Installer. This is a waste of my time. > > > > I'll be putting in my time on the website, and maybe after the > > Installers release (ha!) I'll start work on it again, but for now I > > give up. > > > > Take care, > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> OK, checked it in. Hopefully the next one will be the one. > >> > >> > >> On 10/11/12 4:58 PM, "Om" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Please make the changes in trunk and let me know. I will include > these > >>> changes in the next RC. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Om > >>> On Oct 11, 2012 4:45 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Om, thanks for the new RC. Unfortunately my vote is: > >>>> -0.25 > >>>> > >>>> The text in the licensing dialog for SWFObject now says "The The MIT > >>>> License..." > >>>> > >>>> (Minor stuff below) > >>>> -I also noticed that in OSMF "The" is capitalized in: "Do you want to > >>>> install The Open Source Media Framework (OSMF)?" > >>>> > >>>> -Same for Text Layout Framework > >>>> > >>>> -The package name is 1.0.5. Was it supposed to be 1.0.6? > >>>> > >>>> Sorry, > >>>> -- > >>>> Alex Harui > >>>> Flex SDK Team > >>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. > >>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Harui > >> Flex SDK Team > >> Adobe Systems, Inc. > >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >> > > > > > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
