Has anyone seen the below article, is it really a problem and do users
of clamav need to move to .68 or better to be protected?
http://www.securitytracker.com/alerts/2004/Mar/1009502.html
Jim
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM
What does clamav refer to Plexus or Explet as ? The symantec name is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does clamav catch this virus?
Jim
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
>From Windows to Linux, servers to mob
as a deb?
Jim
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&
that even though these messages are still being
printed clam is still working and stopping viruses
Jim
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks
n now installed on the Debian system is 0.75.1-4
Jim
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsor
f-level: 4, builder:
trog)
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update
immediately!
WARNING: Current functionality level = 3, required = 4
Jim
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
C) 2002 Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
49d48
< {"ScanRAR", OPT_NOARG},
55d53
< {"TCPAddr", OPT_STR},
---
Jim C. | Carroll-Net, Inc.
201-488-4092|
www.carroll.com | Application Service Provider
--
fCheck 600
StreamSaveToDisk
TCPAddr 127.0.0.1
User clamav
Any pointers, work arounds or advice would be greatly appreciated.
---
Jim C. | Carroll-Net, Inc.
201-488-4092|
www.carroll.com | Application Service Provider
---
This SF
max_children to such a degree?
Thanks
---
Jim C. | Carroll-Net, Inc.
201-488-4092|
www.carroll.com | Application Service Provider
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be mor
?
Here's the clamav output:
/home/jim/My Computer/Storage Device (hda5)/boot/linux-swap.swp:
Trojan.Startpage-149 FOUND
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
ave fun barking up trees. (there are lots of them! ;)
Peace,
Jim A.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:00 AM, wrote:
> Send clamav-users mailing list submissions to
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lis
s wrote:
[snip]
Are you running clamav-milter as root? If so, that might be why it is
writing in the root directory.
I have not personally seen that issue of writing files to root directory.
Thanks, Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
htt
signed up for. The
instructions for unsubscribing are located in the header
--
Jim Preston
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
n see that 0.98.1 is already in Testing and UnStable here:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clamav.html
On that page, you can view "todo" at the top middle to see the current
outstanding build/packaging issues.
hth,
-Jim P.
___
Help us buil
Jim Rimedio died on Feb. 25, 2014 so no longer will be participating.
His wife
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> On 2/26/14, 12:32 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Dennis Peterson > >wrote:
>>
>> On 2/26/14, 8:08
nd not
certain whether it was successful or not.
-Al-
Not knowing your situation but.have to ask if there are any other
services you can turn off to conserve memory? And any possible chance of
smaller foot print daemons of any essential services?
--
Jim P
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Randal, Phil
wrote:
> Oops, left off the latest version of patterns - 19041, allegedly, yet we're
> stuck on 19037.
Same here. DNS says 19037 is the latest:
~$ dig +short txt current.cvd.clamav.net
"0.98.3:55:19037:1401269340:1:63:41
sanesecurity/hackingteam.hsb
/tmp/hackingteam.hsb
clamscan --database=/tmp/hackingteam.hsb -ri /
The above will scan your complete filesystem, including mounted partitions.
-Jim P.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clam
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 07 August 2015 12:34:54 Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
>> clamscan --database=/tmp/hackingteam.hsb -ri /
>
> Chuckle, and will, on this system, take a loooggg time. :)
:-)
Here's an update to what
Can someone set no-mail or unsubscribe this guy:
"pupussec...@wanadoo.fr" . It is quite
annoying to get his spam everytime I post to ClamAV.
Thanks!
-Jim P.
2015-08-07 12:36
GMT-04:00 Jean philippe Catteau <mailto:no-re...@spamenmoins.com";
target="_blank&qu
Getting this too. On jar files from a Oracle Weblogic server.
I suspect this is another false positive, along the lines of the
"'Win.Trojan.Bancos-2115" problem last week.
-Original Message-
From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of
Ted Gilchrist
Sen
I just downloaded clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz from
https://www.clamav.net/downloads and tried to check the signature
using the "Talos PGP Public Key" on the same page. It looks like it
was signed with a different public key.
$ gpg --import ../Talos-PGP-Public-Key
gpg: key 0B3BB3A7: public key "vuln...@
fice Training.ppt in Google, you can view as HTML
Your best solution would be to download the sources and build ClamAV on
the the SCO server.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
are not
infected. You could create a test document and send it to your designer
to ensure it is not infected. Write protecting the dot will prevent
existing documents from infecting the templates again.
Thanks, Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
/src # clamd
clamd: error while loading shared libraries: libclamav.so.6: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
Would you advise me why the libclamav.so.6 unable to be accessed?
Thank you very much for your help
wong
Did you check that libclamav.so.6 exists?
Jim
ter): to error state
As you can see no posting for it crashing. When it is in its failed
state in response to status I get "clamav-milter dead but subsys locked"
mail is rejected until the milter is restarted.
Thanks, Jim
___
Help
On Dec 18, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-18 21:14, Jim Preston wrote:
On Dec 18, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-18 19:23, jimli...@commspeed.net wrote:
Hi All,
I have upgraded to the current Clamav 0.95.3 and now my clamav-
milter
crashes all the
On Dec 18, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-18 21:14, Jim Preston wrote:
On Dec 18, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-18 19:23, jimli...@commspeed.net wrote:
Hi All,
I have upgraded to the current Clamav 0.95.3 and now my clamav-
milter
crashes all the
Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-18 21:14, Jim Preston wrote:
On Dec 18, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-18 19:23, jimli...@commspeed.net wrote:
Hi All,
I have upgraded to the current Clamav 0.95.3 and now my clamav-milter
crashes all the time. Not sure what
Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-19 00:56, Jim Preston wrote:
Could freshclam be causing it to crash? I have a cron job set to run
freshclam at 10 minutes after each hour. In looking at the logs again
I just noticed that the crash all occur around 10 after the hour.
Dec 18 13:10:57 JimFedora
ction system.
With tweaking you can get what you need working in the Enforcing mode
but takes a lot of effort sometimes.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On Dec 19, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Jim Preston wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-19 00:56, Jim Preston wrote:
Could I have a bad setting in the freshclam.conf?
Why should the milter be affected by freshclam? Its only purpose is
to
interface between your MTA and clamd.
As long as clamd is
John W. Baxter wrote:
On 12/23/09 9:57 AM, "Jim Preston" wrote:
On Dec 19, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Jim Preston wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
On 2009-12-19 00:56, Jim Preston wrote:
Could I have a bad setting in the freshclam.conf?
Why should the
indow to do the download, try this link
http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/clamav/clamav/0.95.3/clamav-0.95.3.tar.gz
Thanks, Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
rbids) top posting
(placing your reply at the the top of the message)
What happens if you try to download to a different computer? The issue
seems to be computer specific and testing the download on another
computer will help confirm this.
T
then he may get away with 256MB.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
d can find no
specifics.
Attached document? I did not see an attachment. Can you send a link?
Thanks, Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
. This was in response to Alain Zidouemba's reply to Tom
Shaw. If that information you cited is the same that Alain referred to
then yes.
I was just looking to follow-up on the posted information to increase
my knowledge.
Thanks, Jim
___
He
I have to disagree with you completely on this issue Steve. I only use
ClamAV on my mail server and NOT to protect myself but to ensure that
I am not sending malware to unsuspecting Windows users.
Although I do agree that tagging messages as scanned and safe is
misleading. If tagged messages
No Dennis, you would just know they are coming from the spammer and
not zombies. Then again, there would be far fewer zombies if people
took personal responsibility for their computers
On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 2/24/10 6:52 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 02/24/2010
feels that trusting an email that states
it is safe is an alternative to scanning by the receiver.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
And I have the ability to send out using my own server. I do not send
a lot out via my own server as it is not running on a registered
domain so . many mail servers complain that it does not have
reverse DNS etc
Jim
___
Help us build a com
hat ALL inbound, end user mail should be
scanned.
Redundancy is a very good thing. I like to have both onsite backups
for quick access and "redundant" off-site backups for disaster
recovery purposes :)
Jim
___
Help us build a com
s mail. If you you were
briefly involved in a lawsuit for non-delivery / non-notification of
email, I believe you were involved in a frivolous lawsuit and I would
have advocated canceling your account!
--
Jerry
ges...@yahoo.com
Jim
___
Help
Hi,
You'll also see the problem with orders from Sears and a few other
retailers. I had to disable PhishingScanURLs here starting in early
December due to all the false positives.
Regards,
Rick
Hi Rick,
Just a coursoity, did you report the PhishinScanURL problem?
Thanks
logs say
was happening to the system around the time of the OOMs?
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
see if that
helps and tighten the permissions once you have worked it all out.
I run samba and clamav but have not implemented the vscan-clamav option.
I need to upgrade / rebuild the system so maybe I will add that as and
option.
Jim
___
Help us b
s a day at some offset
from the hour to minimize collision with other users (tends to timeout
if done on the top of the hour)
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
at works out to be 91MB at idle.
My mail server is ONLY used by myself so has very little load and
spend more than 99% of the time idle.
Jim
Preston Computer Services
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.
Jim Preston wrote:
Chris wrote:
I'll admit I'm not too smart when it comes to how much memory an app is
supposed to use but it seems to me that since I installed .96 on my
Mandriva 2010 system it's using an excessive amount.
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM
On Apr 14, 2010, at 4:07 AM, Chris wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 19:56 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
Chris wrote:
I'll admit I'm not too smart when it comes to how much memory an
app is
supposed to use but it seems to me that since I installed .96 on my
Mandriva 2010 system it&
pay since
upgrading did not yield any significant improvements for that server.
When we needed services that could not be provided securely by the RH9
server we built a new server to host those new services. This made for
almost zero interruption
Jim
_
, once you have gained the confidence
that compiling works and is not hard to do (on current, up2date
platforms) then going back to your older platform that is still doing
well for all but a few applications and compiling those applications
from source will not be so daunting a t
On Apr 16, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Em 16/04/2010 08:15, Giampaolo Tomassoni escreveu:
Indeed, an EOL on the previous minor version is quite an hazard and
may be
regarded as a self-destructive behavior: it could easily became an
End-Of-(product-)Line, meaning that people
ld still
have failed in May when the unsupported signatures are released. They
just forced the failure a little sooner...
despite of all the warnings, the EOL signature was a bad move in
my opinion.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensi
om working. People
may
have assumed that this would have been the clamav behavior at EOL
deadline,
thereby underestimating the matter.
The sysadmins could have done this by turning off freshclam.. and
saved themselves from having to deal with the upgrade
.
Regards.
They certainly had the option, on April 14th, they could have turned
off freshclam and run happily ever after.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
n in the wild anymore.
For half the day I've been forced to detect no virus's. Now I'm only
detecting the ones known about up till yesterday.
Unless you upgrade to supported software. This is the same as the
commercial AV vendors, your subscription for Clamav 0.94.x has run
out..
ervers.
Nevertheless, a *lot* of people will abandon clamav in favor of some
pay-per-clean solution (which may even not be a 3D System, after all).
Was this the purpose?
Giampaolo
Then that is their choice and when it fails, they can bitch to the
developers of that system an
ase go fix it.
--
/Jason
_______
Absolutely!
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
hing else then ClamAV...
Then they are free to do so and get what they pay for..
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
w unlicensed for who knows what reason.
The traffic on this is ridiculous. You don't like it, buy something,
but
stop whining already.
Amen!
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
sending mail is more
IMPORTANT than sending clean mail, they do not not need to install any
AV software and their mail system will happily send out all it's
mail
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.
On Apr 16, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Unfortunately, the net result will be that the management of the
small
companies running their crappy and old mailing systems will have to
hardly face the fact their mailing box doesn't work anymore
because a
free component in it unrea
On Apr 16, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Simon Hobson wrote:
Jerry wrote:
So, rather than update ClamAV and/or their OS, which in the
majority of
cases would involve no monetary expense, users will purchase new
servers and flock en masse to Microsoft, spend thousands more on
Microsoft Windows Server 20
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
It is not something to do know, but instead something that could
have
been
done introducing 0.96...
Giampaolo: There are lots of things that COULD be done, but it is
not
the
philosophy of the ClamAV project.
As I said, the devs
On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
The sysadmins could have done this by turning off freshclam.. and
saved themselves from having to deal with the upgrade.
Who is the sysadmin of an unmanaged box?
The person who setup it up or the manager that decided that a si
On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Was this the purpose?
Giampaolo
Then that is their choice and when it fails, they can bitch to the
developers of that system and switch to another vendor ...
Apart the fact that open software is not yet-another-vendor. It is a
c
U configured it to not send
mail if Clamav was not working AND YOU are responsible for setting up
and maintaining your systems.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
t don't go
shutting everything down and killing corporate email all
together!! Retards...
Off to find a replacement...
Happy hunting!
Your use of mailing lists is only match by your management of servers!
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensi
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:41 AM, Steve Basford wrote:
Hi,
Just for interest.. feedback on EOL...
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=clamav
Cheers,
Steve
Sanesecurity
See what ya started Steve? :^)
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV
On Apr 16, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Gary MacKay wrote:
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Gary MacKay :
OK, who's the mental midget that decided to just up and kill all
installations of clamav ???
No one. Only very old installs, not all installs.
So who made who god
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Simon Hobson wrote:
Hmm, getting somewhat off-topic here ...
Jim Preston wrote:
Except you do not need to move all your applications, users, and
data. All you need to do is build an expensive server and have it
host ONLY email.
I already have a server that
disservice to
people running a recent release of ClamAV.
The traffic generated by a full CVD download, as opposed to an
incremental update, cannot be sustained by our mirrors.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
just fine, or if not, it isn't clamav's fault.
They shut down your clamd daemon... Not your server.
Come on, Eric. Your defense is ridiculous...
Giampaolo
Why is it ridiculous? You could have configured you server to send the
mail in case of ClamAV failure and yet you did
open relay mail systems would be the norm and not
blacklisted. Alas, we do not live in a perfect world :^(
So, if you feel that the "Mail must go through", configure your system
to do so and stop whining that you failed to have your system
configured to do what YOU wa
, YOU did. You failed to properly configure your email to
handle a failure in clamd.
Were there many others like you who also failed to configure their
systems to handle a failure in clamd? Yes, but that again was their
decision as it was yours.
Jim, you keep adding apples and pears tog
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Instead, I preferred ClamAV. And I'm still helping the way I can: I'm
reporting malware, and now I'm debating on the 0.96 case. And I'm
really sad
when I discover that a move could put in danger the reputability of
the
whole project.
l future updates will
work with
any previous version, etc.
Because the open-source idea is
all based on freedom.
Not in the way you think it is.
--
Freddie Cash
Well said!
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http:/
nd others that chose not to update) decided that your
server should fail. All that was done was a signature that your
version can not read was sent out. You have configured your system to
automatically update the signatures and this signature can not be used
by
On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
The ClamAV team have commanded old versions of its product to stop
working.
I would not describe what they did that way.
Older versions of clamd were going to crash on signatures that newer
versions would accept, and the devs have been p
oint, the point was not that they were acting as
Norton or McAfee, but that those whose systems stopped sending mail
AND are upset by it, did not properly configure their system.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http:/
how that you could have planned for this when you
configured your system.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Obviously, you are choosing to be dense. The bottom line is that the
particulars regarding this event were published. Whether or not you
availed yourself of that notification is immaterial. There was not
anything nefarious in the ClamAV tea
u who also failed to configure their
systems to handle a failure in clamd? Yes, but that again was their
decision as it was yours.
Jim, you're still trying mudding me to stop what I'm saying. The
fact that
the team was aware of the implication of long signatures and the
fact that
obscure
malformatted hexstring error.
Wasn't it better to simply let these system go the way they were
used to?
What's the difference from the clamav standpoint?
None, and what you be doing next month when the new signatures came
out and those same unpatched systems '
eceives the updates OK. In all development there comes a
time when you have to break with compatibility in order to achieve the
results you desire. The ClamAV team felt that this was the time.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
I agree with you entirely. You're welcome to roll back to the
2010-4-
14 virus signatures before the less-than-0.95 kill switch was turned
on, and your outdated ClamAV will continue to run just fine with
these
old signatures.
This is feasible, but know needs some kind of human intervention
lling. It my opinion that people turn to name
calling and such when they have run out of useful arguments and yet
refuse to move on.
Hope you have a great day,
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
ling a new version of gcc is not that big of
a deal.
Have a great day, Jim
PS: No response to my earlier reply to you?
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
configure their systems to be RELIABLE in event of a software failure.
Having failed to either are throwing temper tantrums like a child.
And lastly, did not your parents tell you using such language is not polite?
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive Cl
rosoft updates have causes systems including servers to fail and
crash, should you be petitioning to have Microsoft prosecuted under this
law?
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
lists wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 13:14 -0700, Jim Preston wrote:
lists wrote:
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK
Simon Hobson wrote:
Jim Preston wrote:
According to this reasoning, I know of website that consistently
causes browsers to shut down. This website is a legitimate business
site, Should this site be prosecuted under this law?
In response to your example, that was a DOS attack and is illegal
Ralf Quint wrote:
At 01:14 PM 4/17/2010, Jim Preston wrote:
First, anyones system that stopped sending mail, it was not a
malicious act just that their system can not handle the signature
update that was sent out.
Secondly, they all had both the chance to update before it happened
OR
ause ClamAV to fail. And those that did not heed the warning were
the only ones affected...
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
gs.
- Dan.
I whole heartedly agree Dan. However I have been slandered today being
called arrogant and ignorant, so what do I know?
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Giampaolo,
We are never going to agree so .. I have moved on.
I sincerely hope your's and your colleagues systems are back to running
and that they continue to do so for a long time.
Best, Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
un it from the command line with the force option.
Jim
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
do you have on this line? In the default clamd.conf (new one
distributed with 0.96) it is:
# Default: no
which is not a problem. Check your clamd.conf and if you can't see what
is wrong, paste the contents (or partial contents) and I will see if I
can determine what it does not like.
1 - 100 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
