lists wrote:
Lots of interesting views. Yes, people should have updated. However,
this act of maliciously killing critical servers to score a point is the
kind of thing malware writers do. It is also illegal in the UK under the
computer misuse act. Insisting they update 'or else' is blackmail. Here
we have two quite distinct criminal offences.
Who is actually responsible for it, because free or not, your a fhucking
criminal that want your hands cutting off and stuffing up your
arhsehole.
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
First, anyones system that stopped sending mail, it was not a malicious
act just that their system can not handle the signature update that was
sent out.
Secondly, they all had both the chance to update before it happened OR
configure their systems to be RELIABLE in event of a software failure.
Having failed to either are throwing temper tantrums like a child.
And lastly, did not your parents tell you using such language is not polite?
Jim
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
