ping
--
Peekee
Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
1+1 = 3
Based on the above: I am the winner there are no rules.
How do you figure?
egg.
--
Peekee
and judged it in a single message).
--
Peekee
I'm being a bit lazy here. The rule below would need to be Power 3, do
I need to specify that in the proposal or what is a good way to word
that. Does the AI follow from the power of rules or does that need to
be stated also?
Quoting Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Proto: &qu
are fluid. Players are
only regulated by rules that are the same fluid as them or emulsion.
Fluid for players is tracked by the Registrar and by the Rulekeepor for rules.
--
Peekee
Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/24/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/24/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Patterns:
>> 1) Line-Pattern: 3 or more contestant of the same party with dist
Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/24/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patterns:
1) Line-Pattern: 3 or more contestant of the same party with distinct
collinear coordinates. Provided no item on the Agoran map breaks their
line.
What does it mean for an item on the
Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/24/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Players are only
regulated by rules that have the same charge as them or neutral charge.
The analogy to electrical charges doesn't seem to hold up very well.
-root
Could not think of n
Proto-contest: Map Patterns
Setup:
1) This Contest is known as the "Map Pattern Contest".
2) The Contestmaster is Peekee.
3) Any player may enter the contest by announcement.
4) Contestants may leave by announcement.
5) The Contestmaster may change these terms by announcement. Provide
Create a rule titled "Charges" to read as follows:
Charge is a switch with values +ve, -ne and neutral (default). Players
and rules are the only entities that posses a charge. Players are only
regulated by rules that have the same charge as them or neutral charge.
--
Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
1) A line must contain at least two distinct coordinates.
"points", not "coordinates". But actually a line by definition contains
an infinite number of points.
You might also want to make it explicit that the coo
Proto-contest: Grid
Setup:
1) This Contest is known as the "Grid Contest".
2) The Contestmaster is Peekee.
3) Any player may enter the contest by announcement.
4) Contestants may leave by announcement.
5) The Contestmaster may change these terms by announcement. Provided
that e has
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
1) Contestants may change their coordinates by announcement. Provided
they do not move to a coordinate of another contestant.
So if you're at (3, 5), I can't move to (3, 8) because I'd have the same
X coordinate as y
Proto-contest: Grid
Setup:
1) This Contest is known as the "Grid Contest".
2) The Contestmaster is Peekee.
3) Any player may enter the contest by announcement.
4) Contestants may leave by announcement.
5) The Contestmaster may change these terms by announcement. Provided
that e has
Quoting Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 9/18/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/17/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I announce the initiation of an Agoran decision for the position of
>> &
e that is easily readable in plain text. Then any player
may declare it invalid by announcement.
--
Peekee
exists purely as a mechanism for changing its variable's value.
This sheds some new light on my CotC DB maintenance, e.g.
update players set active = 'f' where name = 'Quazie'
What other game mechanisms can we re-cast using a SQL metaphor?
All of them? H anyone ever done a pure programing/sql nomic?
--
Peekee
Proto: Loser:
Amend rule 1922 appending a clause to read as follows:
(e) Loser, to be awarded to any person who looses the game. The
Herald's monthly report shall record how the player lost.
--
Peekee
have any other value. If
an instance of a variable would otherwise fail to have a possible
value, it comes to have its default value.
--
Peekee
Or,
Proto: Get some colors.
Amend Rule 2126 by appending the following clause after e)
f) A player may spend all of their VCs provided e owns at least 6 of
different colors to gain a VC of any color defined by the rules.
--
Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
Any player CAN ask the Assessor to handout a VC of that color by
announcement.
Free VCs? No thanks. It particularly damages the palette win.
-zefram
I was thinking that it is going to be nearly impossible to get a
pallet win (I
s possible. The selected
player then gains a VC of the color in question.
The Assessor SHALL NOT make more one such announcement a month.
--
Peekee
r agora) did not pick it up
automatically and has no easy option to render it correctly. My work
email client (evolution) picked it up no problem.
--
Peekee
Well-formed or not, the message rendered perfectly for me (albeit in
Gmail, which is probably to be expected).
If google says it is correct then it is correct.
--
Peekee
colours. There are actually an infinite number of real
colours (combinations of differing strengths of wavelengths) for any
colour we can perceive. So technically there are an infinite number of
different greens that are indistinguishable by the human eye.
--
Peekee
So players willing to sit on appeals only would
be welcome.
-zefram
Persons?!
--
Peekee
ns and announcements in
the game.
--
Peekee
Here is another way of looking at things.
1) Players make statements.
2) Statements are interpreted by the Gamestate (Rules + Rules defined
stuff) and the human beings that play the game (~Players).
3) The statement in 1) may or may not change the game state depending
on the interpretation in
an With 1 Agoran Consent.
All points awarded to a player by a contest that is declared a
Shenanigan
are destroyed.
No points may be awarded by the contestmaster of a contest that is
declared a Shenanigan.
}}}
Levi
--
Peekee
a TTttPF is generally accepted as performing actions even
though the main body of the message is a quote, and therefore
irrelevant to Rule 2149.
--
Peekee
ant, but if a rule/proposal was passed that made George Bush a player
I am fairly certain he would not consider himself a player. From an
outside perspective e would not be a player even if the rules said so.
I don't think being a player can be forced upon entities.
--
Peekee
ox avoids a lot of woolliness in the first clause of the current
R2110, and also makes it easier to establish who should get the win.]
}}}
Can any entity win? non-players, fish, rocks?
--
Peekee
5 VVLOP
10 VCs 6 VVLOP
Numbers could be tweaked though. Wants to be worth saving up a couple
more different colors to try and get a bigger gain. Maybe even
consider making it non-linear!
--
Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Any entity that CANNOT register MUST NOT make such an
announcement.
What does this actually do? A non-player entity violates the rules. So what?
--
Peekee
of "unless" existed in formal logic.
I've always used it to mean "if not".
-zefram
--
Peekee
ng the
naming of coauthors, since people collaborate on protos all the time.
--
Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Whence the anti-Zefram movement?
-zefram
Damn he's on to us. Move to plan B.
--
Peekee
How reckless of you.
Quoting Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
With Agoran consent, I install Peekee to the office of Herald.
BobTHJ
--
Peekee
ng it (which is what "flip" is). Explicate for both definitions
whether a null change counts.]
So "I become active" will no longer be an acceptable variant of "I
flip my activity to active"?
-root
--
Peekee
RAINBOW! Not a colo(u)r but it should be special.
I'm open to suggestions on an appropriate color. Mauve is my current
choice.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
--
Peekee
Hmmm I was going to cfj but I cant think of an argument that does not
use avatars in some form.
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
I register as a player.
No you don't. Aren't you lucky R2145 doesn't apply to non-players.
-zefram
--
Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
I support this proposal (in that I want to become a player again).
You made your bed, you must lie in it. If comex hadn't deregistered you,
I was pondering doing so. I'd have done it in conditional form so that
I didn'
Prize for being registered for the shortest amount of time goes to...
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee thereby deregistered emself, so I judge FALSE.
--
Peekee
I support this proposal (in that I want to become a player again).
I submit the following proposal:
make Peekee a player
AI=1
Upon the adoption of this proposal, the following actions occur in order:
1. Rule 869 is amended to remove the sentence "E CANNOT register within
thirty days
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Zefram, is there any chance of hurrying the judgment of this. I do not
want to attempt any actions (Voting etc) whilst my being a player is
in doubt.
Statement: Peekee is a player
Peekee, what are the circumstances around the sending o
Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I intend to ratify the VC holdings listed in the Assessor's Report
that I published within the past hour.
Could that cause problems if it turns out I am not a player anymore?
--
Peekee
tate.
Surely it is best to resolve the issue in the safety of the discussion
forum rather than with messages that would effect the game state.
--
Peekee
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I CFJ on the following:
Peekee submitted an email to the agora-discussion forum containing "Fnord!"
--
Peekee
I would urge Judge root to Judge TRUE. If I am foolish enough to allow
other people/Players to send email as if from me. Then those message
sal in that message, or was it just
a proto? It's not clear to me. I initially took it as a proto, but
it lacks your usual "proto-proposal:" header, and also lacks the common
"proposal:" that would label it as a proposal submission.
-zefram
--
Peekee
atements that e
believes are true.
Upon the adoption of this proposal, Eris becomes a knave.
--
Peekee
s
are insecure)
--
Peekee
1. Following Murphy's VC spending and the end of the week, your
EVLOP is now 3, so you'll be able to cast 3 votes on ordinary proposals
in the next batch (tomorrow) and the batch after that (2007-08-11).
-zefram
--
Peekee
argh sorry my bad
--
Peekee
Where is the archive of CFJs?
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
I am left wondering what part of Rule 754 I "violated":
FWIW, the way I read rule 754 it doesn't impose any obligations on anyone,
and so is incapable of being violated.
-zefram
Thanks thats a bit more brief than my version.
--
Peekee
booo you're no fun
Quoting Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
I
register
as
a
*player*
.
Channeling Syllepsis, are we?
'whois peeke
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
H. Peekee, you are hereby informed that criminal cases 1715-1716 have
been initiated in which you are the defendant, and invited to rebut
the arguments for your guilt. The pre-trial phases end one week from
this m
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
I
register
as
a
PLAYER
.
Are you the same Peekee who was a player intermittently up t
should learn to reply to list
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:27:22 +0100
From: Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DIS: proto: clarify Mother, May I?
To: Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Jon says that the fact there is "rather weak evidence" that he is a
Person is a conclusion that most of his friends have come to.
Disappointed though it would have been more fun if there was some
precedent set for Jon not being a Person.
--
Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EM
hould interact with then what would the default/common-sense
interpretation be?
Peekee
On 7/17/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On behalf of Agora I hereby repeal all rules, regulations, terms and
any and all other parts of the Primo Coporation and its charter. The
Primo Coporatio
e's no formal process to reconcile the two versions:
it's a question of who gets bored first, or whether the Lords gets
sufficiently intimidated by a threat of the Parliament Act.
-zefram
What about all the devolved governments?
--
Peekee
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
The partnership would have devolved all of its obligation.
Obligations are only devolved onto parties of the agreement.
The parties onto which the obligations are devolved number at least two.
Hmm. You might have found a bug the
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
Does it need to pass all of its obligations onto all of its members?
Yes, that's how "member" is defined.
-zefram
A binding agreement governed by the rules which devolves its
legal obligations onto a
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
What are the rules that specify that obligations of a Partnership must
be devolved to ALL of its members/parties?
That's not required. The requirement is that the obligations be devolved
onto at least two parties, who are then k
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
3. The sole purpose of this Agreement is to create a Partnership
for the nomic Agora. The Parties of this Agreement are the Members of
the Partnership.
...
6. Peekee shall ensure that the Partnership satisfies all
obligations t
Would this Agreement be sufficient to create a partnership (provided
XXX was something sensible)? Comments and suggestions please.
Thanks,
Peekee
Terms of Agrement
1. This Agreement is between Peekee (of the email address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and XXX.
2. The sole purpose of
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
guess he is just being quirky then.
Peekee wrote:
I believe accountants(?) etc. use that rounding fairly often.
No. Bankers' rounding is nearest-or-even. That's also the usual mode
for binary floating point arithmetic.
-zefram
--
Peekee
are rounded up the numbers tend to be higher than they should.
--
Peekee
the contest, unless
e was contestmaster of a different contest for at least 3 days
of the previous week.
A player with 100 or more points may win the game by announcing
this fact. Upon such an announcement, each player's score is
set to zero.
--
Peekee
iction in Time.
2) There is a restriction to part of the "super-ruleset" (containing
Laws and ruleset).
3) There is a restriction on method, Agora can not change the rules
with Agora's current ruleset.
4) There is also a restriction on method. Agora can only change the
rules as specified with in Agora's rules.
Peekee
71 matches
Mail list logo
