Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
proto-proposal: stronger definition of paradox AI: 3{{{ Amend rule 2110 to read If an inquiry case on the possibility of a rule-defined action or the permissibility of an action results in a judgement of UNDECIDABLE, and that judgement is not appealed within a week, then the initiator of the inquiry case wins the game. This can only occur once per inquiry case. [The reformed judicial system provides a clear way to indicate a legal paradox, so let's use it. Requiring the use of a CFJ for the win by paradox avoids a lot of woolliness in the first clause of the current R2110, and also makes it easier to establish who should get the win.] }}}
Can any entity win? non-players, fish, rocks? -- Peekee
