Sure - I think the weekly report is 14+ days late so you can
deputize to publish it whenever (will still push ahead with the
changing cards to blots, so if that goes through it will be a
little more currency-tracking-like).
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I confused Referee with Arbito
I confused Referee with Arbitor lol, sorry. One of the multiple positions
G. has (I dunno if he wants it or not though)
Referee seems subjective-based/easy (people frequently just suggest the
Cards anyway too) so I guess I can do it.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflife
Apart from not removing judges, Murphy is doing a pretty good job, and it's
not terribly friendly to remove an active-ish officer. It's also a ton of
work. Might I suggest something a bit easier for your first go (say
Registrar or Reportor)?
-Aris
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:01 PM Cuddle Beam wrot
I'll take Arbitor I guess. Already set up for deputizing for it.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree. There are ton of vacant or semi-vacant offices right now that you
> could take, what with G. being in like 3 things he doesn't wan
I agree. There are ton of vacant or semi-vacant offices right now that you
could take, what with G. being in like 3 things he doesn't want and Alexis
having just left. There are probably more offices than players at the
moment, and we're struggling to fill holes. This is a good way of
encouraging a
I disagree—many offices involve a lot of work, so it's only fair to reward it,
and for a reward to be meaningful if needs to be relevant. It's not unfair; if
you want piece of the pie, vacancies come up fairly frequently.
Gaelan
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 8:27 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> How abou
How about we tie this into the "religious" gameplay we had cooking in that
other thread? Offices working for the "greater good" and all. (I'm not too
comfortable with Offices gaining currency of the 'main game' because I feel
like that subverts gameplay, it's like if the Banker in Monopoly got more
I hope you get better soon
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:32 AM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> Hope you're alright, Alexis :(.
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be
> > about to play in that time. Apologies. I dereg
LOOL
But yeah, we need to get this fix proposal passed quick.
On 2/28/2018 8:52 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
Crap. At least I'm on a place where I can get more Apples.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Nope, only Eastman weeks. Agoran w
Crap. At least I'm on a place where I can get more Apples.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nope, only Eastman weeks. Agoran weeks start on Monday, and that's the
> default. No assets gained. And you probably still burnt the apples.
>
>
Nope, only Eastman weeks. Agoran weeks start on Monday, and that's the
default. No assets gained. And you probably still burnt the apples.
-Aris
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:31 PM Cuddle Beam wrote:
> (They were actually created at the "end" of the week, but oh well lol, same
> idea)
>
> On Thu, M
I'm confused? The assets are created at the end of every Agoran Week, which
would be at midnight UTC on the Sunday-Monday interface, no?
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:14 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I have to agree. The IRL time race is annoying.
>
> I take all resources at the Mines here and transfer t
(They were actually created at the "end" of the week, but oh well lol, same
idea)
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> New week, new resources. It's the 1st of March, and Agoran Weeks start on
> the 1st.
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
>> Wait, what? W
New week, new resources. It's the 1st of March, and Agoran Weeks start on
the 1st.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Wait, what? Why do we have more assets at the facilities? I thought this
> was weekly.
>
> Gaelan, a very confused Treasuror
>
> > On Feb 28, 2018, at 7:14 PM
Wait, what? Why do we have more assets at the facilities? I thought this was
weekly.
Gaelan, a very confused Treasuror
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 7:14 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I have to agree. The IRL time race is annoying.
>
> I take all resources at the Mines here and transfer them to myself.
Just aesthetics, really
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It just doesn't sound right to me. Overlapping isn't that big a problem. I
> mean, it's basically the same system anyway. I agree that a new name would
> be nice, but... "You have
It just doesn't sound right to me. Overlapping isn't that big a problem. I
mean, it's basically the same system anyway. I agree that a new name would
be nice, but... "You have 2 Stains" doesn't have the right ring to it. It
doesn't sound like a possesable object, and also sounds kinda weird and
awk
I prefer a name which isn't "Blots" to avoid overlapping. Stains sounds
pretty good.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Oh I'm cool with it mostly - I played in the first Blots era and was just
> looking
> for another theme for the fun of it, but having done due diligence o
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:56 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Title: “Transactions”
> AI: not sure, help?
>
> Create a rule titled “Transactions” [power?] with the following text: {
> A set of actions to be performed is a transaction if it is specified as
> such by a rule with power [?] or greater, or t
Oh I'm cool with it mostly - I played in the first Blots era and was just
looking
for another theme for the fun of it, but having done due diligence on
alternatives
I don't mind being retro.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> It's fine to have something with a similar name. In the las
Title: “Transactions”
AI: not sure, help?
Create a rule titled “Transactions” [power?] with the following text: {
A set of actions to be performed is a transaction if it is specified as such by
a rule with power [?] or greater, or the document or message describing the
actions. If any action in
Can't we just call them sins? Penances?
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, Blots were the hardest for me, too, even after spending a couple hours
> with a thesaurus and googling different religious words for sin. If no one
> comes up with something better then, blots
Hope you're alright, Alexis :(.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be
> about to play in that time. Apologies. I deregister.
>
> Alexis
--
>From V.J. Rada
I never actually read the Parties proposal, but I just looked at the
Complexity system and I actually quite like it. If we decide to go with
a idea-1-like system, then I'll just use that instead.
On 2/28/2018 5:25 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Tend to agree. It may be useful to keep it around perma
Yeah, Blots were the hardest for me, too, even after spending a couple hours
with a thesaurus and googling different religious words for sin. If no one
comes up with something better then, blots it is.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Blots I don't know. Calling them Blots sounds the
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Kenyon Prater wrote:
> 8023* G., Aris 2.0 Zombie Lots G. 3 sh.
> PRESENT. I'm concerned by the fact that nothing seems to require the
> Registrar to flip the master switch of a zombie? If somebody explains why
> or else proposes to amend this,
Also, Notary should be in high, and Ref should be in mid.
-Aris
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:02 PM Kenyon Prater wrote:
> Confused by "Job Points switch which can only be 5", and then that also
> seems to be the switch that tracks how many points e gets per month? Is it
> a max of 5, or what?
>
>
Blots I don't know. Calling them Blots sounds the best, but that's been
used. Stains would work (they're stains on your soul), but it doesn't have
the same ring as Blots or Rests. Temples we should just call temples or
shrines, because those are generic terms at this point (unlike churches,
mosques
All the best for a good outcome, Alexis.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be
> about to play in that time. Apologies. I deregister.
>
> Alexis
>
Shouldn't the owner of the facility and the land be defined as always being
the same? That way we don't have to worry about them ever getting separated.
-Aris
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:29 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> I spent months revising this thing and you people are just barely noticing
> thi
Tend to agree. It may be useful to keep it around permanently, rather than
renacting it every time we need it,
-Aris
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:51 PM Madeline wrote:
> If you wanna do "X-paying Jobs", just reenact Complexity from the party
> we had.
>
> On 2018-03-01 07:03, Reuben Staley wrote:
Sorry to see you go. I hope you recover and return soon.
-Aris
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:09 PM Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I've just been hospitalized for an unknown amount of time; I will not be
> about to play in that time. Apologies. I deregister.
>
> Alexis
I like this. I'll have more detailed comments when it's typed up in a
proposal, but I think that this fits with the spirit of what we're going
for. Certainly it is a good idea to have a neutral spawn point, even if the
colors don't mean that much yet. I suggest just calling the facility type
"fount
A very rough draft for a proposal. I'm going to hold off on writing it up
until the current mess is resolved, but I wanted to get feedback on whether
the idea is interesting to people
The proposal would: {
Create a Land Type of "Gray". Land that has Land Type "Gray" is gray land.
Gray land canno
Even if pending with paper didn't work, pending without objection is
untouched, right?
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Yes.
>
> El 28 feb. 2018 13:19, "Kerim Aydin" escribió:
>
> >
> >
> > I'll admit, I've been pretty much blipping over the details on
> > which parts of
If you wanna do "X-paying Jobs", just reenact Complexity from the party
we had.
On 2018-03-01 07:03, Reuben Staley wrote:
Not that I'm in this for the fictional currency, but honestly, 3 coins a
month for all this recordkeeping is not enough. I'm not writing up any
ruletext yet, but I will talk
Confused by "Job Points switch which can only be 5", and then that also
seems to be the switch that tracks how many points e gets per month? Is it
a max of 5, or what?
Other than that something like this could be good. Leaning towards the
second because it's more flexible--you could imagine the Ta
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Corona wrote:
> 1. I did read through it, and asked others their opinion. What does
> "guidance"
> mean here?
Maybe publish comments on your read-through, or maybe give a starting
opinion on if a degree was deserved? (If you did something like this,
many apologies, I misse
I think they were at -2 before, hence rebalance brought them to -1. Will check
archives.
On 20:43, Feb 28, 2018, at 20:43, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>By the way, I thought you zerored-out ProofTechnique and Ienpw?
>(January
>Karmic balance?) Though even if so it may have self-ratified since
>then
1. I did read through it, and asked others their opinion. What does "guidance"
mean here?
2. Right. Will try to get it done within the next two days, then.
3. I can't repeal things by myself on a whim, obviously. But okay, I'll search
Assesor/Promotor reports for the past year and select some g
By the way, I thought you zerored-out ProofTechnique and Ienpw? (January
Karmic balance?) Though even if so it may have self-ratified since then.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Corona wrote:
> Indeed.
>
> This is a Notice of Honor:
> -1 o (not a Player)
> +1 Ienpw III (not a Player)
>
> ~Corona
>
>
That's a good start. Anything else you'd like to add?
El 28 feb. 2018 13:07, "Gaelan Steele" escribió:
> You have arbitor twice, but no treasuror.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Feb 28, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Reuben Staley
> wrote:
> >
> > Not that I'm in this for the fictional currency, but honestly, 3 coins
(Late) apologies. Between all of the laws using them, I imagined I saw
something to that effect.
~Corona
On 23:45, Feb 21, 2018, at 23:45, Nicholas Evans wrote:
>Unless something has changed in my absence, it's not official - just
>culturally ingrained. I'm not interested in sparking this deba
Yes.
El 28 feb. 2018 13:19, "Kerim Aydin" escribió:
>
>
> I'll admit, I've been pretty much blipping over the details on
> which parts of land failed to take effect. Is it safe to assume
> I have a welcome package with paper to pend with? I don't want
> the circularity of using non-existent cur
I spent months revising this thing and you people are just barely noticing
this. Good observation skills, everyone. Okay, but in all seriousness,
comments are inline.
El 28 feb. 2018 13:17, "Corona" escribió:
1) When a player builds a facility, in whose ownership is it created?
AFAIK, nowhere do
I'll admit, I've been pretty much blipping over the details on
which parts of land failed to take effect. Is it safe to assume
I have a welcome package with paper to pend with? I don't want
the circularity of using non-existent currency to pend and fix
a problem with currency.
As CuddleBeam has kindly demonstrated, the public facilities do not function as
intended (i. e. give all players some starting resources). The map should not
cause Agora to become a real-time game, where you just HAVE to log in at the
start of every week or be hugely disadvantaged. Therefore, I
1) When a player builds a facility, in whose ownership is it created? AFAIK,
nowhere do the rules specify that.
2) Does anyone else think that the below wording is too vague about who from to
whom is the facility transferred?
"If the ownership of the Parent Land Unit of a Facilty is changed, th
Ok folks, what's a set of religious terms for Blots, punishment, temples, and
penance that won't be too culturally loaded for anyone? Keeping to the Agoran
theme, something ancient Greece and pleasing the gods? Or something else (a
little leery after the Karma/Eta thing annoyed some people).
You have arbitor twice, but no treasuror.
Gaelan
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Not that I'm in this for the fictional currency, but honestly, 3 coins a
> month for all this recordkeeping is not enough. I'm not writing up any
> ruletext yet, but I will talk about 2 id
Not that I'm in this for the fictional currency, but honestly, 3 coins a
month for all this recordkeeping is not enough. I'm not writing up any
ruletext yet, but I will talk about 2 ideas I had for an office reform.
First idea:
1. Players have a Job Points switch which can only be 5.
2. Sort all
Not that I'm in this for the fictional currency, but honestly, 3 coins a
month for all this recordkeeping is not enough. I'm not writing up any
ruletext yet, but I will talk about 2 ideas I had for an office reform.
First idea:
1. Players have a Job Points switch which can only be 5.
2. Sort all
I bid 6 coins on 4 and 5
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I bid 5 coins on 4 and 5.
>
> Gaelan
>
> > On Feb 28, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> >
> > I bid 4 coins on auctions 2-5
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> >>
> >> pf
> >>
Aren't the auctions broken though since Agora has to be the auctioneer? I
remember someone saying that I am unable to transfer Agora's things, so I'm
not sure investing in land is a good idea right now.
El 28 feb. 2018 07:23, "Gaelan Steele" escribió:
I bid 3 coins on auctions 2-5.
Gaelan
> On
This doesn’t need to be 3.1, just 3. Oops.
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 7:19 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> Title: PAoaM Patch
> AI: 3.1
>
> —
>
> Remove the sentence "If the reenacting proposal provides new text for the
> rule, the rule must have materially the same purpose as did the
> repealed versi
Title: PAoaM Patch
AI: 3.1
—
Remove the sentence "If the reenacting proposal provides new text for the
rule, the rule must have materially the same purpose as did the
repealed version; otherwise, the attempt to reenact the rule is
null and void.” from Rule 105 “Rule Changes.”
If rule 2599 is not
Gaelan wrote:
I bid 3 coins on auctions 2-5.
NttPF. Also, is anyone working on compiling a list of specific
things broken with PAoaM?
I bid 3 coins on auctions 2-5.
Gaelan
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 5:30 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> I bid on each an amount equal to its current highest bid, plus one coin.
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>
>> Actually, your most recent message has the same time zone and
58 matches
Mail list logo
