Shouldn't the owner of the facility and the land be defined as always being the same? That way we don't have to worry about them ever getting separated.
-Aris On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:29 PM Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > I spent months revising this thing and you people are just barely noticing > this. Good observation skills, everyone. Okay, but in all seriousness, > comments are inline. > > El 28 feb. 2018 13:17, "Corona" <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> escribió: > > 1) When a player builds a facility, in whose ownership is it created? > AFAIK, nowhere do the rules specify that. > > > I think there's a line somewhere that says that a facility always has the > same owner as it's parent land unit. If that does exist somewhere, that > text you copied in (2) is not really necessary in the first place. > > 2) Does anyone else think that the below wording is too vague about who > from to whom is the facility transferred? > > "If the ownership of the Parent Land Unit of a Facilty is changed, that > facility is transferred along with it." [Attn. Rulekeepor: inconsistent > capitalization and misspeling of facility] > > > No. The facility is transferred with it, so from the same old owner to the > same new owner. > > 3) Shouldn't the rules specify what constitutes "consent" for use of a > facility on another player's LU? > > > There's an entire rule all about Agoran consent. > > 4) Shouldn't players (and contracts) be able to destroy (and downgrade?) > their own facilities without waiting for the next month? > > > I guess? I didn't put that in because I thought it would be illogical to > downgrade a facility. Maybe you should be able to destroy it though. > > ~Corona >
