sage-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [sage-devel] Re: wasm Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: wasm 'William Stein' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: wasm parisse
• [sage-devel] testing optional packages Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: testing optional packages Dima Pasechnik
• Re: [sage-devel] Incorrect result for `sum(1/factorial(n**2),n,1,oo)` Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] Incorrect result for `sum(1/factorial(n**2),n,1,oo)` Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Incorrect result for `sum(1/factorial(n**2),n,1,oo)` Georgi Guninski
• [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Denis
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: help menu in jupyter notebook Kwankyu Lee
• [sage-devel] Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? 'Gonzalo Tornaría' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? John H Palmieri
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? John H Palmieri
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? John H Palmieri
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Question: why does /usr/bin/gcc get called during Sage startup? Marc Culler
• [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini [email protected]
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Dima Pasechnik
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini [email protected]
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Volker Braun
  • [sage-devel] Re: Governance proposal: Maintainer/code-owner model for .ci, .devcontainer, .github/workflows, tox.ini Matthias Koeppe
• Re: [sage-devel] Modularization project: I. The goals Matthias Koeppe
• [sage-devel] sagemath-10.4 beta3 Henri Girard
  • [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Henri Girard
  • [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Henri Girard
  • [sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3 Kwankyu Lee
• [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) kcrisman
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Kwankyu Lee
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) '[email protected]' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Oscar Benjamin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Oscar Benjamin
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) dimpase
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) dimpase
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) TB
  • [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Kwankyu Lee
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Nathan Dunfield
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project) Matthias Koeppe
• [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
  • [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies 'Martin R' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Joyner
  • [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Nils Bruin
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies [email protected]
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies G. M.-S.
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Travis Scrimshaw
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies [email protected]
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies Volker Braun
  • Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies [email protected]
• [sage-devel] SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
  • [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Nils Bruin
  • [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Kwankyu Lee
  • [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Antonio Rojas
  • [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization dimpase
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization Dima Pasechnik
• [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Lorenz Panny
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Georgi Guninski
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Emmanuel Charpentier
  • Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects Michael Orlitzky
• [sage-devel] Urgent proposal: stop merging PRs without consensus, work on a way forward Dima Pasechnik
• Re: [sage-devel] Urgent: Please vote on these "disputed" PRs [email protected]
• [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
  • [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package '[email protected]' via sage-devel
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Michael Orlitzky
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Marc Culler
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package François Bissey
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package John H Palmieri
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package David Roe
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Dima Pasechnik
  • Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package kcrisman
  • [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Marc Culler
  • [sage-devel] Re: Proposal (redo): Make python_build (and its dependency pyproject_hooks) a standard package Matthias Koeppe
• Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect Matthias Koeppe
  • Re: [sage-devel] (Re-)building an inclusive SageMath community. II: Recognizing and fighting abuse, bullying, disrespect David Roe
• Re: [sage-devel] Re: Application for NumFOCUS affiliation of SageMath Matthias Koeppe

• Later messages