On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 2:08 PM Kwankyu Lee <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wouldn't people in the python world who need a serious amount of math know of > sage anyway, and then, if they cannot rely on all of sage because that is too > large, use, for example, `citation.get_systems` to see whether they can do > without some dependencies? > > > I think they would do `pip install sagemath-graphs` if they need graphs > functionality. "Too large" is relative. What was "too large" few years ago is normal now, and RAM only gets cheaper, and 32-bit systems get irrelevant.
And they'd be often quite unhappy, as e.g. basically nothing in src/sage/graphs/generators/classical_geometries.py will work without sage.rings or GAP. Many other parts of sage.graphs use things in sage.combinat, as well as cliquer, bliss/nauty, etc. Dima > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/8dd2c1ce-7811-4ada-94cc-075d5b6ab93bn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq2sRJSntR33W5%3DQOo4rZH_AN0aOkTC%2BoKwAuHY1t6htOQ%40mail.gmail.com.
