On Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 5:35:10 AM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote: I meant the sage library as a collection of mathematical modules. If a certain module did not but somehow would develop to rely on the mathematical functionality of another module, then the design of the modularization should embrace the development. The splitting of the sage library in the present modularization reflects the present reality of the separation of different mathematical parts of the sage library. But of course the reality may change in the future as we develop the sage library. Then the modularization should reflect the change, not block the change.
Exactly. The design of the modularized distributions can evolve, and like everything in Sage, such changes will be in the hands of the Sage developer community. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/73f94b7b-a5ec-458d-973c-49c29b0b9f2bn%40googlegroups.com.
