On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 10:10 PM Matthias Koeppe <matthiaskoe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This has been merged in 10.4.beta7. > Good to see some action :) Here is a short anti-security rant from my experience. To protect something, you need to fix all weaknesses. To break it, an attacker needs only one exploitable weakness. What does game theory say about this non-cooperative "game", will there be Nash equilibrium? Will competing attackers reach equilibrium? Will everything be compromised? "Will they'll drop the bomb" (Pink Floyd)? In the past bugs has killed people by overdosing some medical stuff and water supplies has be compromised, giving the ability to overdose water "ingredients". My threat model includes a prodigy (kid) which breaks real world stuff like the electricity network (possibly while drunk). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAGUWgD9nc1hCGWXKFPEbhn6bVLJ0FCbA8gbEzzPJhRo4hb-OvQ%40mail.gmail.com.
