On Saturday, April 20, 2024 at 3:01:04 PM UTC-7 kcrisman wrote: "normal Python" is not necessarily as relevant for those who would *only* want Sage, or at least mostly so. Having just another Python package might lead us to implementing powers as ** instead of ^, which would be a regression, or needing namespaces for almost everything, which again limits the value of Sage qua Sage.
I understand this concern, and I can reassure you that the modularization project keeps all functionality of the Sage application intact; that includes the surface language using the Sage preparser. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/a6599569-361e-4ebd-8828-4363c65af524n%40googlegroups.com.
