RE: [SAtalk] 2.43 - too many false negatives

No, neither of those seems to be the culprit. I've uploaded my mini-corpus to: http://welshdresser.tripod.com/corpus.gz Paul On December 5, at 5:58pm, Michael Moncur wrote: > Are many of them from "DailyPromotions"

[SAtalk] 2.43 - too many false negatives

? Paul --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo

[SAtalk] Is my spamtrap working?

dated, usually within the last 5 or 10 minutes (it's a low volume server), but it doesn't change immediately when I process mail through the spamtrap or hamtrap. Should it be? I'm only concerned that they're not actually doing anything...

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Is my spamtrap working?

spams via regular rules then it will start actually using the bayes database and allow me to teach it? Thanks muchly for the help... regards, Paul Quoting Bryan Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paul Fielding wrote: > > > > I recently set up a shared database w

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Is my spamtrap working?

later, it still says 30 in the next entry in the log. The logs do indeed indicate that it's using the correct database. I would have assumed that regardless as to whether or not it's using the database during the learn process, it would need to add the information about the spam that

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Is my spamtrap working?

e spamtrap user, and also are getting updated again when other users process spam. I shall make a recommendation to the author of that documentation (which otherwise is very fine documentation) for an update to his site Thanks again for the help... regards, Paul - Original Message -

RE: [SAtalk] 7245 Habeas and counting

I as well have gotten alot and want to set it to 0 and exlude it from bayes. So just to confirm i enter the below in my local.cf file. Non have made it thought because of things like big evil however might as well make it 0 till they work out how to stop it. thanks score HABEAS-SWE 0 bayes_igno

[SAtalk] Spamassassin on Suse 9.0?

knowing what to look for.. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference

RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin as a Filter then Forward Mail to MS Ex change

http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly is what I use with Postfix to do pretty much the same thing. Very simple and it works. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

[SAtalk] missed spam?

ough. X-Spam-Score: 1.8 BAYES_30,HTML_60_70,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE,OACYS_CONS_6,RM_rb_ANCHOR,RM_rb_BODY,RM_rb_HTML,RM_sl_Parens,SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST What am I missing? Thanks... Paul --- The

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin on Suse 9.0?

e a little digging and I think i need perl-PDL which I'm now downloading using Yast.. wondered if anyone's come across this problem before.. tempted just to use CPAN :-) rgds, Paul > -Original Message- > From: Paul Hutchings > Sent: 21 January 2004 15:06 > To: '

[SAtalk] Mail Body Size

FP. Thank Paul --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn

[SAtalk] BigEvil PF

I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one of my group clients get mail from lawyer that uses this product. Can someone provide some feed back on why this is a rule so insted of just deleting it i know have an educated answer to my client Thank Paul

[SAtalk] too much spam...

Spam-Score: 3.422 BAYES_00,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,RM_rb_ANCHOR,RM_rb_BODY,RM_rb_HTML,SUBJECT_ENCODED_MY_TEST X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.30 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) ??? thank

RE: [SAtalk] the list itself???

There is something wrong.. My posts have been bouncing back to me with [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delay reason: SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data: host sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net [10.3.1.7]: 421 Unexpected failure, please try later > -Original Message- > From: Gar

Re: [SAtalk] too much spam...

No Bayes db yet, but I would think the one rule would score it a 5 Paul Covington, Chris wrote: Your Bayes must be hosed if what you think is spam gets BAYES_00. Chris From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Diaguila Sent

[SAtalk] BigEvil PF

I am getting a lot of BigEvilList_72 (http://www.exclaimer.co.uk) FP as one of my group clients get mail from lawyer that uses this product. Can someone provide some feed back on why this is a rule so insted of just deleting it i know have an educated answer to my client Thank Paul

[SAtalk] SPAM: (no report template found)

SPAM subject? Paul _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

[SAtalk] installing as a user, with PREFIX != /usr?

some more files with bad paths left. I can't try out spamassassin now because I don't have root at work and don't allow programs to put their files in /usr at home, so this option would be very helpful. Thanks! -Paul ___ Spamassassin-t

Re: [SAtalk] installing as a user, with PREFIX != /usr?

Okay, I just saw Erik's message from last week in the archive, and it solves my problem. I don't know why I missed that before! Thanks, -Paul ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/list

Re: [SAtalk] BSD rc.d script and HTML spam

I'm a FreeBSD committer. The right answer is to have spamassassin, when it is invoked as a daemon, write its pid out to a file called /var/run/spamassassin.pid. Do not use killall. I would suggest adding a command line option to spamassassin to do this, and then having /usr/local/etc/rc.d/spama

Re: Re: [SAtalk] BSD rc.d script and HTML spam

Craig, do the pidfile, it's much more universal, and pidof is a linux-only thing. ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: Re: [SAtalk] BSD rc.d script and HTML spam

By the way, for extra bonus points, use code that looks like the following attachment. To do this right, you really want to lock the pidfile after opening so that multiple invocations don't occur. #include #include #include #include #define MAX_PID_SIZE 10 static int pid_open (const char *

Re: [SAtalk] Administrivia: list organization question

If nothing else, it's easier to remove a name from a list of addresses than have to manually type in the guy's e-mail address. Please not to change good thing ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/list

Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists

Procmail: # remove egroups advertisements :0 fw * ^User-Agent:.*eGroups-EW | sed -e '/begin egp html banner/,/end egp html banner/d' - Original Message - From: "dman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:00 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance

Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelist

no, auto-whitelist does not use the SQL database. (only uses the dbm file in the user home directory) in the current spamd it appears that SQL and AWL are mutually exclusive, although that's not in the documentation. Larry Rosenman wrote: > If you are using SQL, does the auto-whitelist also

Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelist

gt; > > > > Not really mutually exclusive, just probably AWL won't behave the way > > > > you expect... It should be pretty easy to create a > SQLBasedWhitelist.pm > > > > for people who want AWL to store stuff in the SQL db. I'm really > pretty

Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelist

g it." > -- Tallulah Bankhead > > > >>On 4 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes wrote: >> >> >>>Not really mutually exclusive, just probably AWL won't behave the way >>>you expect... It should be pretty easy to create a SQLBasedWhit

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Hi, I am the SpamAssassin maintainer

Paul Myers has some reasonable complaints, he argues against ISP's installing mail filtering without notifying their users or providing an opt-in / opt-out. That's a very valid problem and probably opens that ISP to liability. He also seems to fail to grasp that many spamassassin

Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: Re: Hi, I am the SpamAssassin maintainer]

load that spam creates, and my reasoning for it? If not, I'd ask that you do so, to correct any errors of interpretation your actions may have caused. Paul Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.s

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd Problem

> > Doesn't seem to be working how? Try spamd -D -q and let us know what it says... > spamd won't consider -q without -x try spamd -D -x -q -- = Paul Rushing [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Sponsored by http:

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd doesn't want to work correctly

ist.lock : No such file or directory " (Where did > it take this // directory???) -- = Paul Rushing [EMAIL PROTECTED] = ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] whitelists in MySQL?

o this. But I'm wondering if this would be a better or worse (performance wise) to reading them from file? Thanks Paul ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] mailman + procmail + spamassassin

to no avail. If I try spamassassin from the command line when I'm su-ed to nobody it works fine. Is there some problem with piping to commands in /etc/procmailrcs/? -- Paul Tomblin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not speaking for anybody The e-mail of the species is more deadly than the mail.

[SAtalk] Sieve and SpamAssassin

I have been poking through the list and through google and haven't had any luck with configureing SpamAssassin to work with sieve and cyrus. Is there a how-to or a page with a few suggestions that someone can point me to? Thank you,

[SAtalk] handing SA to cyrus

ppreciate it. Even tips on debugging where my mail is going after SA tags it would be great. Thank you, Paul -- # #Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? #Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? #BSD: Are you guys comin

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin + Postfix

once procmail is installed you only really need to uncomment one of the following lines in main.cf: $ grep procmail main.cf #mailbox_command = /usr/local/bin/procmail #mailbox_command = /some/where/procmail -a "$EXTENSION" Paul On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:50:23AM -0700, Harry Pu

[SAtalk] Invalid Header

I am trying to get SA working with procmail and hand it off to cyrus. I have 90% of this debugged and working for me. I am having a problem with the final delivery. If anyone can give an insight I would appreciate it. Here is the error. Jun 5 15:47:25 mail postfix/pipe[16809]: 5857D2645C:

Re: [SAtalk] implementation

I'm not familiar with iPlanet, but we use a linux/postfix relay in front of our exchange boxes. I set mine up as per http://www.advosys.ca/papers/printable/postfix-filtering.html and it works like a charm. regards, Paul - Original Message - From: "Jon Fraley" <[EM

[SAtalk] sa-learn on mbox files exported from Exchange?

doing something dumb and training it that my own mail server sends spam etc.. I did ask this several months back but didn't manage to find much info, so any advice would be gratefully received. regards, Paul --- This SF.Net email sponsored by

[SAtalk] Hardware Spec Question

ng the right lines or not? If it all goes well I may just stick a spare drive in the Dell and stick Debian on that, but if it all goes too well and I end up with a working Compaq box I'm wondering if it will be up to the job - I'm mostly a Microsof

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn on mbox files exported from Exchange?

slip through? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Martin Radford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 August 2003 15:04 > To: Paul Hutchings >

[SAtalk] User who receives load of spam and blacklist_to

Any ideas? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerc

RE: [SAtalk] User who receives load of spam and blacklist_to

Thanks - I'm about to head off for the day, but I shall take a look on your emporium and see what I can do! regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- >

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc 1 released

Excellent! Any idea roughly how long until it's on CPAN? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc 1 released

Gotcha - thanks for the clarification. Paul - Original Message - From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Hutchings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 4:02 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 r

[SAtalk] big attachments taking too long to process

iated. Paul --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and Mail Relay

t made learning about Postfix a lot easier simply because it splits all the options into the relevent areas. Whilst I never tried Sendmail it does have a Sendmail module. Paul - Original Message - From: "John B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[SAtalk] spamd performance

5155 17.6 27873 5.9 5134 3.9 4048 6.9 9856 4.4 3976 4.3 7112 11.1 21048 4.9 9847 4.2 2780 its looking like a second per kb... but there are 12second 3K scans, and 4 second 4K scans. Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning? Thanks Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

1342 8.4 1421 7.6 1456 11.3 1424 2.0 2099 2.2 4799 9.1 4901 2.4 1414 2.5 1414 3.6 1340 better... but still not getting the < 1 second per message. On Wednesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >Whats causing the

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

3 1.6 2953 0.5 1686 0.6 8309 0.5 2293 0.5 3100 0.6 1493 1.5 3801 These number do not match peak load numbers. I was in the 10-20second per msg range between 6-9pm EST. On Thursday 11 September 2003 22:17, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 09:42 PM 9/11/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >New m

Re: [SAtalk] spamd performance

nesday 10 September 2003 19:46, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 06:21 PM 9/10/03 -0400, Paul Farber wrote: > >Whats causing the 3X difference in msg scanning? > > Are you using _ANY_ network checks? DNS blacklists, razor2, dcc, pyzor, etc > all have wildly varying times because they are

RE: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

anything that goes out from a box of mine. regards, Paul --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTEC

[SAtalk] mysql user-prefs script?

The spamassassin mentions several times about a user-prefs script using mysql as a backend.. but the link to the spamassassin site does not list the file. is it gone? Can I get a copy? Thanks -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f-tech.net

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!!

I just upgraded from rc5 and did something wrong. It appears that the BAYES database is not being consulted by SpamAssassin. Some mail is not getting scored at all. Other mail gets a higher than normal score due to not getting BAYES scored. I see no BAYES tags in the headers at all. I can read t

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!!

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:32:04 -0700 Chris Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just upgraded from rc5 and did something wrong. > > It appears that the BAYES database is not being consulted by > SpamAssassin. > > Some mail is not getting scored at all. Other mail gets a h

[SAtalk] Copies of outgoing emails

TED]>; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:49:20 -0700 (PDT)Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From: "Paul Gregoire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: Spamassassin-talk -- confirmation of subscription -- request 562054Date:

[SAtalk] auto-whitelist problem

bayes files - it looks like it's not changed since the upgrade. Any pointers on how to test this out and check it is working properly (mail is still getting scored and tagged). regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8

Re: [SAtalk] Copies of outgoing emails

stuff started happening. - Original Message - From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Paul Gregoire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:52 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Copies of outgoing emails master.cf Description: Binary data

[SAtalk] passing user: in qmail scripts

's prefs to call up, and therefore the @GLOBAL settings are used. Since I am using a single uid/gid to deliver mail to all users I cannot use dir ownership (or can I?) Can I rip it out of the message somehow? Any fellow qmail users up against this?? -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570

RE: [SAtalk] RBL, any need for them to be REAL TIME?

depends on the RBL I guess, there might be an argument for doing that with something like spews, or cc specific ones as they probably don't change that much hour to hour, but with something like spamcop you'd have no chance as it changes all the time. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchin

Re: [SAtalk] Sa-learn not learning

I had the same problem on my Redhat box and needed to install the db4-devel rpms to be able to install the db_file CPAN module. regards, Paul - Original Message - From: "Trevor Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 20

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail relay

> Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Paul Farber Farber Technology 570-628-5303 www.f-tech.net

RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox

t some spammish mails blocked, but users in all_spam_to should never get mail blocked. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

to join in! > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMA

RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

I wouldn't mind a copy if possible. FWIW I use Outlook/Exchange at work, I get my users to drag spam into a public folder (so the headers go as well) then synchronise with Netscape/Mozilla mail as it produces an mbox file which sa-learn can handle. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Ne

RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32

I played with the howto on openandhome, it seems really simple to get spamassassin up and running on windows, the problem seems to be finding a Windows MTA that can take an email, pipe it out then re-inject it and deal with it. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel

RE: [SAtalk] Filtering envelope to (was: Info about blacklist_to)

I think that's more of an MTA function than spamassassin - AIUI spamassassin won't delete/reject mail by itself. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Fr

Re: [SAtalk] Too many rules?

gt; https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. > See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: > Click here: ht

RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Evil rules HUGE update!

tr -d '\r' evilrules.cf.new > -Original Message- > From: Roger Merchberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 2:30 PM > To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Evil rules HUGE update! > > At 15:39 10/14/2003 -0500, Stewart, John wrote: > > >Ok

RE: [SAtalk] Mistake-based training

Simplest thing I've found is to have users move the entire item to a Public Folder, you can then use something like mozilla/netscape to get the folder in mbox format which can be learned quite easily. regards, Paul > -Original Message- > From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [SAtalk] Looking for some interview subjects

You should call me. I'm starting a company that will eliminate spam for good. Not just filter it. Filtration won't scale. We'll be eliminating spam for good. CP -- Chris Paul Rex Consulting - Messaging and Security Solutions - www.rexconsulting.net +1 831.338.7712 Key fingerpr

Re: [SAtalk] Looking for some interview subjects

Oh no. I didn't mean to mail the entire list. Got to remember to change that To: line. Huge mistake. (I acutally went queue fishing after sending and thought I stopped it it.) OH well! By switching our customers who want ham only to X.400, we will eliminate spam. (OK... Just joking.) Actuall

[SAtalk] Totally whitelisting someone?

telist" and it is reducing the scores, but the GTUBE test has such a high score that the adjustment doesn't seem to be enough! I hope that makes sense, TIA for any advice! regards, Paul --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The S

RE: [SAtalk] Totally whitelisting someone?

he options, to me "--remove-addr-from-whitelist" means I'm not whitelisted, not that I am, IYSWIM? Thanks for the reply and the advice! regards, Paul --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you li

RE: [SAtalk] Need advice on new SA setup.. Which delivery agent is best??

filter and pass all inbound mail to an internal Exchange 5.5 box and also to deliver outbound mail unfiltered. You could take a look at http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly for a real quick way to bolt on spamassassin once you have postfix up and running.

RE: [SAtalk] Sole scanner?

Take a look at http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly I'm using it here with spamd/spamc and it works a charm - I'm assuming you already have postfix setup as an inbound relay? regards, Paul > -Original Message- > From: Angel Gabrie

RE: [SAtalk] Report points vs. header points discrepancy??

anyone? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Paul Hutchings > Sent: 29 March 2003 18:10 > To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: [SAtalk] Report po

[SAtalk] A newbie question about spam rules

) RBL: DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Open Relay The user is using Outlook 2K to compose the message. I know I have configured my mail server to not allow open relay, so could someone please explain what SA is telling me here. Thank you in advance. Paul Lee Network Administrator

Re: [SAtalk] Converting away from site-wide

don't have content_filter set in main.cf, instead use the overrides in master.cf and have a second IP address that doesn't have a -o content_filter smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=spamfilter: 1.2.3.4:25 inet n -n - 1

[SAtalk] Cannot open bayes_path?

, 8346 bytes. Any ideas? Looks like the message is still being scanned/tagged, just not sure what it's trying to tell me. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: [SAtalk] Cannot open bayes_path?

he changes :-) regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 May 2003 15:07 > To: Paul Hutchings > Cc: '[EMAIL PROT

[SAtalk] What's bad about X_LIST_UNSUBSCRIBE?

As subject really, one of my users had something tagged falsely, this alone gave it 4.3 and I'm not sure exactly what it is/does? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROT

[SAtalk] Razor/DCC Effectiveness?

x27;ve looked on the respective sites, and I'm still not overly clear how well they work, and what sort of bandwidth penalty they may impose (the sizes vary, but we receive something like 4000 inbound messages on an average day). regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin on a high load mail system

need each message to have per-user settings - although we are currently running with system-wide defaults. When we do real per-user settings (via SQL) then we will be introducing a few MySQL servers for spamd look-ups. The biggest performance boost we got was splitting SMTP and SA onto separate ser

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin Tag

On my system it's /etc/mail/spamassassin/10_misc.cf, not sure if that will be the same everywhere. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Simon Crowther [ma

RE: [SAtalk] Very happy with SA 2.55 - 99% success rate!

Did you work those out yourself, or using some third party util - if so, might I enquire what? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Bayes range Total score > > 1-10%3.7 (Just a few

[SAtalk] postfix + filter=spamd + user preferences

stfix aliases maps these to username@, it appears the filter still tries to lookup prefs for firstname.lastname in the SQL database.. which of course, fails. Has anyone got this setup working? Paul --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by:

[SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 10000, spamd relay

Hello All, Quite soon, I could possibly be inheriting a spare Enterprise 1 (possibly fully loaded, i.e. 64processors etc...), for use with spamassassin. I am looking for a highly documented and maintained procedure for implementing spamassassin with Solaris 8/9, which relays (no mailboxes

Re: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 10000, spamd relay

Not a problem, we have a nuclear power station on-site... From: Kristian Koehntopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jonathan Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Paul Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Sun Enterprise 1, spamd relay Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2

RE: [SAtalk] OT - spamassassin - mailserver recommendations - passthru to exchange after scan

e use postfix just to tag spam. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 July 2003 14:46 > To:

[SAtalk] Logging

current versions of SA or whether something like this is planned for future releases? Otherwise, does anyone have any suggestions, patches or comments? Many thanks, Paul Gamble   M-Web: S.A.'s most trusted and reliable Internet Service Provider. Just Like That. To join, go to: http://join.mweb.

Re: [SAtalk] Web Front-end

A settings from within Webmail. http://www.horde.org/ Paul --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XB

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin idea?

Jm's autoreply told me to mail it here :) Paul -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:14:05 +0200 (MET DST) From: Paul Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SpamAssassin idea? Hi, I noticed that lately, spammers are using a trick to

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin idea?

the IP, then it can block the message. But in real life, there are so many situations where this is not the case, that blocking that scenario would block way too much legitimate email. Paul > Olivier > -- "Movie scripts no longer write, George Lucas shall" ---

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin idea?

be me are rare and I can always justify dropping that email, though I'll agree that such a thing is better done at the MTA level. It's just that I don't have access to that :) Paul -- "Movie scripts no longer write, George Lucas shall" ---

[SAtalk] Own Rules? Latest CVS?

These are probably FAQs, but I couldn't find the answers easily: Q: How do I create my own Spam Rule in Spam Assasin? Q: Whats the best way to update the rules? (I'm using SA 2.11) Should I take the latest rules from CVS or the 2.31 package? Th

[SAtalk] echo tcp7 request

I have installed SA and vipul's razor and must first start by saying thanks. Product works great. I have a question though. I am getting the following in a random timepattern. 07/16-14:46:37.040427 192.168.1.133:2791 -> 194.109.217.74:7 07/16-14:46:37.231578 194.109.217.74:7 -> 192.168.1.133:

[SAtalk] Building A SpamAssassin Box, how much horsepower?

m thinking something like P4 2.1Ghz or so, with 1GB ram. Based on everyones experience will that box handle tagging messages for my userbase, or should I be looking at something different? Thanks in advance! Paul --- This sf.net e

Re: [SAtalk] local.cf

I've balanced mine by setting required_hits to 4, and using whitelist_from to make sure I get mail from others that might be generating a false positive. Paul Brad Reichert wrote: Would anyone with a well defined local.cf file be willing to share with me? I'm just getting started

  1   2   >